Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 236. page

File: _DSC5074.jpg (795KB, 1000x673px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 1000x673px

>>2982338

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One 8 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	118 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	118 dpcm
Image Created	2016:12:13 09:59:05
Image Created	2016:12:13 09:59:05
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Width	1000
Image Height	673
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Soft

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-13 at 11.47.07.png (1MB, 607x909px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 607x909px

>>2982339

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-13 at 11.47.37.png (557KB, 998x670px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 998x670px

>>2982341
This is HP5+ pushed to 800 in Rodinal 1:50 shot with a Minox GL

>First time director
>First year doing a second year project
>My refection is I can do better
https://vimeo.com/190047685

I made this 6 months ago
I mean judge for yourself, I didn't have a tripod or anything so its all freehand shit
https://vimeo.com/164326716

>>2966423
>video snap shits
you need to work on your editing ability knowing when to cut and how to cut is a very important skill to learn. In your case watch a shit ton of documentaries of all forms and topics, take note on how they can deliver a narrative.

work on framing, get a tripod or monopod and start with learning about montage (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYedfenQ_Mw)

>>>/r/

>>2991504
you should really just retake the photo as a long exposure or without so many people in the foreground.
it's difficult to remove such large aspects of the photo because there isn't information behind these foreground subjects making removing them very time consuming, this is why it's better to get things right when taking the photo so you only have to make slight changes...removing several people in the foreground of a photo basically means rebuilding half of the photo from nothing

1. Fuck off
2. Go torrent photoshop it's not hard to learn
3. The photo is shitty anyways try again

File: Big_Bend_01.jpg (683KB, 980x653px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 980x653px

>>2989811
2/9

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.1
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:26 18:40:44
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/22.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	980
Image Height	653
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	224
Color Matrix	135

File: Big_Bend_02.jpg (589KB, 1036x691px) Image search: [Google]

589KB, 1036x691px

>>2989812
3/9. Really liked how the sunlight made these shadows.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.1
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:26 18:43:03
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/22.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1036
Image Height	691
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	224
Color Matrix	135

File: Big_Bend_03.jpg (775KB, 933x622px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 933x622px

>>2989813
4/9. Had to crop this one so the quality is a bit lower, but I like how my eyes move when I'm looking at it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.1
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:26 18:41:59
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/22.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/22.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	933
Image Height	622
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	224
Color Matrix	135

>>2989444
Faggot.

>>2989444
REEEEE

>>2989444
Instax.
Polaroid don't make film any more.

read the sticky

make sure there's enough light in the right place (i.e. not shining in their eyes or making unflattering shadows)

If you're out expose for them not the background. I'm guessing you're using a kit lens, so set you're aperture to 5.6 and keep it there then you will have the same exposure for all shots. I would put centre focusing on and focus for the eyes of you're subject always to stop the camera from choosing the background. You can go as low as 1/50th probably if you have steady enough hands. Maybe max of iso 400 to reduce noise. If you're shooting a single subject I.e close into the face then for the best bokeh possible zoom out to 55mm and 5.6f. If the background is distant enough you should get decent bokeh. I recommend getting a 35mm prime. If you're going to use a flash try to use it only for a fill in flash. (expose for background then subject infront using manual TTF mode)

Above all. Learn and have fun. Idk if any of that helps

0) See this as an opportunity to learn and grow

1) Consider getting the 50mm f/1.8. It's the cheapest lens you can buy and it will greatly improve your people photos. If you shoot it at 1.8 and place the focus point dead in someone's eye, you'll get normalfag-pleasing shots no matter what else you're doing wrong

2) Learn the basics of exposure on Youtube: The exposure triangle, how the camera meters, reading the hisotgram, and how to do exposure compensation.

3) Shoot people in shade . Avoid shooting people facing the sun. Try to compose your shots so that the background does not interfere with the subject, even if blurred (at the time, you won't be able to tell how stupid that branch growing out of your mother's head is, because you have a three-dimensional understanding of the scene, but the next day the picutre will look ridiculous) This won't get you great photos, but again, they're easy tricks with good return for a complete beginner
Look up the rule of thirds, shallow depth of field, and backlighting

File: 1374089285365.png (5KB, 302x237px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 302x237px

use the gear thread you retard

>>2988870
Obviously I'm new, retard.

>>2988871
read the sticky use the gear thread delete this thread next time

on crop it'll be around a 30mm lens. It'll be just as sharp and let in just as much light

Pls don't shoot candids of your friends. It's alright to ask them to pose. They don't even have to look at the camera.

>>2988833
you can either get a uwa, like 8 or 12mm f/2.0 or 2.8 and bite the distortion but have everything in focus or a 50 1.2 and have less noise and no distortion but at that aperture at night half of your shots will be out of focus

>>2988833
Okay then, you asked for it, you got it.
>Regardless of budget, what are good city/night/streets lens?
24mm f1.4 L II
35mm f2 IS USM.
50mm f1.4
85mm f1.4 Zeiss adapted to EF or 1.4 ZE You're going to have to man up and learn to focus for this one.
You might just want to let people know if you're shooting APS-C or FF next time, or if you're looking for equivalents. Either way every lens listed will do what you need for APS-C too just one stop down apart from the 85mm.

Flickr? Picasa? Ello?

>>2988792
flickr would be my bet, but if you know how to use tumblr (ive never been able to search it adequately) then tumblr might work

(also, rolling)

>>2988805
my breakfast is long gone, should i reroll or take a picture of my shit when it comes?

(also, roll again)

>>2988714
You need more lights to get the JAV cover aesthetics.

But they often also use ring effects in the eyes of their models, yes.

I'd suggest doing that with a ring diffuser with a portable flash inside, the related diffusers are like $20-30 shipped from China. A bit cumbersome, yes, but unlike cheap ring flashes you get sufficient light output.

For an actually powerful ring flash, you'll have to shell out more dough.

>>2988721

great, thanks for the input

>>2988714
JAV porn aesthetics is more like VHS or cheap miniDV camcorder aesthetics. I think you want more in the lines of Gravure style photos. Like the other anon said, you want multiple diffuse lights.

Dayum, even sugar, mirari, ambush, megapickles can't produce shots like these

>>2988700

>implying I'm good enough to do that

>implying I can get that many qt3.14 to attempt this

>>2988700
not one you mentioned is considered a good /p/hotographer

>>2988637
curious as well, I love the fisheye / zoom

>>2988637
>Anyone know what this was filmed on
Nope, aside from just being some garbage '90s camcorder with a fisheye adapter.

> any good alternatives
Yeah, any decent camera from the 21st century instead of lo-fi trash that anybody over 18 got sick of after using their parents' cameras as kids.

It's a VX1000. The VX2000 or VX2100 were a lot sharper and crisper than that.

File: Italy north of milan.png (3MB, 1903x957px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1903x957px

do you mean street view?

>>2988611
i lied, that's way far north of milan, aka switzerland

>>2988527
why are the colours so weird?

>>2988527
>I would like some feedback

take ten more and come back.

no one gives feedback to writers for one liners.

https://youtu.be/17f-tNEhNnQ

>>2988421
>Am i missing something?
The gear thread >>2986527
kill yourself faggot

>>2988424
I value my life so I'll pass. Merry Christmas, troll.

>>2988421
>speed booster
black magic