File: humidity control box.jpg (62KB, 1016x573px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 1016x573px
What is the best temperature to store your camera in order to prevent fungus from growing on it?
A few weeks ago the place I live in got extremelly humid because it was raining basically every day. I keep my camera outside, and being in that extremelly humid environment was enough to allow some ugly mold to grow all over the low pass filter and the viewfinder glass assembly. I made a thread here, /p/ said my camera was done for. I blasted the sensor with germicidal uv light as well as direct sun light, then I took it to get the sensor cleaned one month or so ago. In the near future I'll get the viewfinder glass assembly replaced (it costs like 51$ for the 70D, which is my camera), but in the mean time I'm keeping my camera in an air-tight box packed full of silica gel dissicant.
I used a DHT22 temperature and humidity sensor to test if the dissicant was actually making the air inside the box any dryer and, surprise! It actually works. The relative humidity inside it went from 50%, just after I closed the box, to 10%, half an hour later. I wonder if it will go any lower than that.
Anyway, what does /p/ think of this?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Ruijorji OVS Image-Specific Properties:
11 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2992428
>I keep my camera outside
Why the fuck would you keep your camera outside?
>>
>>2992429
I don't keep it outside the house, just outside any kind of enclosure.
>>
>>2992428
I live in Thailand.
It's humid as fuck (70% or something).
Every one I know that's into photography here (including myself) has a dry cabinet.
When I travel, I use ziplocks with silica desiccant.
I envy those that live in more moderate climes that do not have to take these precautions.
File: IMG_20161230_215734.jpg (479KB, 1538x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
479KB, 1538x2048px
Is this actually good Photography? This guy has thousands of followers and has actually nailed himself gigs with companies like Bose. Do you guys think this guy is a proficient? https://twitter.com/Brandonwoelfel/status/813990559819923456
22 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
jesus christ thats a lot of fucking bokeh
>>
I love bokeh in general.
His pictures are over-processed garbage, literally trash.
>>
He has his style.
People like his style.
People with money like his style and hire him.
What's the problem?
Doesn't conform to your notions of style?
File: denver-best-headshot-photographer-1.jpg (472KB, 735x900px) Image search:
[Google]
472KB, 735x900px
I need a headshot for career purposes and was hoping to take one myself. I have an X100S and basically no other equipment.
Is natural light enough? What time of day should i take it and how should i position myself relative to my windows?
What would you suggest for a cheap background? Is wall enough? Hang a sheet?
Any recommendations for post-processing?
Thanks.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:02:09 18:26:40 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/10.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 105.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2992002
>X100S
You will look like a goblin
Just go to the local photo store and have them do it. Won't cost you a lot and you will get pro results
>>
>>2992002
>help me cheap my way up to my dream career!
you already failed at the very start.
>>
>>2992007
There's nothing wrong with the camera, it takes great photos of people.
Assume that i want to do this myself as a fun sort of project. Can you offer any actual tips besides "go somewhere else?" I'm going to do it so let me judge whether it's a flop. Thanks.
Anonymous
Rate my girlfriends pictures 2016-12-30 10:32:36 Post No.2991742
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Rate my girlfriends pictures 2016-12-30 10:32:36 Post No.2991742
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Atvaizd004.jpg (190KB, 1200x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
190KB, 1200x1600px
Rate my girlfriends pictures
Anonymous
2016-12-30 10:32:36
Post No. 2991742
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey, guys, my girlfriend is amateur photographer who likes to take pictures of nature and sky.
Could you please rate her photography and give some advice's?
Thanks!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Nokia Camera Model 6300 Camera Software V 07.00 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 1600
13 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Atvaizd065.jpg (150KB, 1200x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
150KB, 1200x1600px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Nokia Camera Model 6300 Camera Software V 07.00 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 1600
>>
File: Atvaizd031.jpg (24KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 640x480px
>>2991744
>>
File: Atvaizd061.jpg (328KB, 1200x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
328KB, 1200x1600px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Nokia Camera Model 6300 Camera Software V 07.00 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 1600
File: IMG_9600.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x2448px
A friend gave this old polaroid land camera to me and I fixed it up. I'm gonna get a roll of film and test it out.
12 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2991677
No you won't.
>>
>>2991678
This jelly is too sweet
>>
>>2991680
Takes 40-series roll film which hasn't been produced since Nixon was president.
Jokes on you kid.
File: 31564775250_24b4bbb7a4_k.jpg (716KB, 2048x1389px) Image search:
[Google]
716KB, 2048x1389px
Hey, /p/. I'm gonna drop some photos in this thread. Tell me what you think or to kill myself or something. Cool
34 Posts / 26 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 31128772313_0da3ece88c_k.jpg (1MB, 2048x1469px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2048x1469px
>>
File: 31900992946_45a1ef0cec_z.jpg (74KB, 640x444px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 640x444px
>>2991065
>>
File: 31821586981_5c1b0b7369_k.jpg (1MB, 2048x1314px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2048x1314px
>>2991068
File: Z-sony-a5000-front-black.jpg (123KB, 1024x575px) Image search:
[Google]
123KB, 1024x575px
Do you think Sony a5000 w/ 16-50mm kit lens is a good entry for me to get into photography? I don't know that much about photography, but I have an interest in it. Also, it goes with my budget. Should I buy it or just buy a DSLR?
13 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2990969
Spend the extra money and get the a6000.
>>
i got one a couple months ago, its nice i like it defo best mirrorless at that price range
>>
Use the gear thread anon
Sage goes in all fields
hy /p/ i'm new to photography. recently i've been given a nikon d70s. is this a gudgear to start?
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>I have a camera, can I take photos with it?
Nope, sorry.
>>
try film OP
>>
>>2990565
read Understanding Exposure from Bryan Peterson, be very-very suspicious when you hear something related to the names Northrup and Rockwell, take lots of photos and have fun.
File: 18404-beggarwoman-1375440046-834-640x480.jpg (66KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
66KB, 640x480px
So today I was driving my car in the third world country I live. While I was driving I see this with a camara taking photos of a begger (who had his kid with him). The begger was in the middle of the street and the camara man was in the other side of the street and in between a ton of cars.
Suddenly I hear "yo imma wreck your camara get the fuck out". It was the begger insulting the guy who was taking pictures...the guy left and nothing happened.
What does /p/ do if an agressive guy walks towards to you? In this case was a begger, maybe you could tell him "hey, i just wanted to transmit the reality you are living in, let me buy you something to eat for you and your kid" or something like that? idk. Sorry for the cancer english.
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2990397
>yo imma wreck your camara get the fuck out
Third world country, speaks American
>>
>>2990401
it was a translation...the original quote would be:
"e wacho sali de aca porque te voy a rompe la camara amigo ee"
>>
Maybe respect that the person doesn't want their picture taken and leave?
File: thomas sewell.jpg (418KB, 1170x950px) Image search:
[Google]
418KB, 1170x950px
Conservative economist Thomas Sewell retires from public life to focus on photography.
>uring a stay in Yosemite National Park last May, taking photos with a couple of my buddies, there were four consecutive days without seeing a newspaper or a television news program — and it felt wonderful. With the political news being so awful this year, it felt especially wonderful. This made me decide to spend less time following politics and more time on my photography, adding more pictures to my website.
- See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/12/farewell#sthash.7CADFStt.dpuf
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/12/farewell
Photos:
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOWn00cErmtIpV_WzPk-owa9NH9s0kLWP8umvMFRmiXP8_s73yCHxzV_e9z5ZViuQ?key=TEgyX0x0Wkhib0t0QzIxejZ0SmpGemt0OHU4SF9n
Most of it is babbys-first-DSLR-shit-tier, but if you look at it chronologically, he does seem to be getting better.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties:
14 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
Literally who?
Also, literally who gives a fuck?
>>
File: 41cJA+BbRgL._SX344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (22KB, 346x499px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 346x499px
It is pretty interesting to watch his photography improve.
>>
He actually served as a photographer in the Marines during Korean War.
File: 1424829874891.png (535KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
535KB, 1920x1080px
This is a public reminder that equivalent aperture is a myth.
The only reason small-sensored cameras produce wider depths of field is because they require wider lenses to achieve standard fields of view.
Your nifty fifty gives you the exact same bokeh on an APS-C camera as it does on a full frame camera. Thank you for listening.
23 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 4uvEqtc_zpsfab5fa55.thumb.png.9457eb717ac11f6fd56c77b9d21c21d6.png (285KB, 556x312px) Image search:
[Google]
285KB, 556x312px
Yes, and?
>>
>>2990133
And Poland should be banned from 4chan.
>>
Hi! I'm Tony Northrup!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5zN6NVx-hY
File: Canon-Extender-EF-II-III-Comparison-All.jpg (24KB, 600x177px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 600x177px
Who has them?; share your positives and negatives. Old v new. Anything really.
Particularly interested in pairing with the 100-400 IS L II f/4.5-5.6... but can't find anyone doing it. Everyone seems to pair with the 70-200s
18 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2989727
F4 is the maximum you can use them on for a x2
>>
>>2989727
I have a 1.4x TC. It works with AF on f/4 lenses, primes usually outresolve even with the TC.
My older Tamron 70-200/2.8 "Macro" works well with it but I use that lens mostly at f/4 anyway.
Still looking for a good 300/4 for better reach.
>>
>>2989727
Depends what you're shooting, they lose 1-2 stops of your aperture and don't give much in return that cropping won't give you, or having two lenses (one heavy and one light)
That F4 lens becomes a F5.6 with 50% loss of light and shutter speed to gain 40% zoom (less than the lost stop)
In general it seems the people who actually like the extender are those who have it bringing a F2.8 lens to F4.
At F4 they can still manage sports or birds during daylight, and non-action stuff in less-than-daylight.
If you start with F4 and extender changes it to F5.6, it's a pain in the ass how limited it is. It becomes too slow a lens for sports/wildlife and suffers during imperfect lighting.
Treating it like a F4 and trying to fix the shots in post will just get lower or same quality as simply digital cropping to get the exact same 40% zoom area with the no-extender wider aperture. With the added penalty that the extender doesn't allow you to choose the location of the cropping later.
They're very expensive for how limited they are (I have one lens that works with my extender, none of the rest of my collection) They don't necessarily improve quality, or save weight. I guess the one and only upside is having extra choice between close or far zoom.
Sure, a 70-200 F2.8 with extender might weigh 835g less than a 300mm F2.8, but the extender combo is only F4.
The 300mm F4/L IS is 525g lighter than the 70-200 with extender.
The weight difference between having a 70-200mm + extender versus carrying a 300mm + a 50mm prime isn't really significant. Nor a significant difference in space. Nor in swapping, you won't get wide-angle shots with the 98mm minimum on the zoom if you don't take the lens off to remove the extender, and it's just as fast to replace the 300mm with the 50mm and get much wider view. Or switch to 85mm or 40mm or whatever you want.
This is probably why gear-a-holics talk about the extender but I almost never see real pro photographers use them really.
Anonymous
What filter is this and where i find it? 2016-12-26 09:56:25 Post No.2989691
[Report] Image search: [Google]
What filter is this and where i find it? 2016-12-26 09:56:25 Post No.2989691
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: ginac filter - copia.jpg (488KB, 1504x960px) Image search:
[Google]
488KB, 1504x960px
What filter is this and where i find it?
Anonymous
2016-12-26 09:56:25
Post No. 2989691
[Report]
[View this topic]
This filter is mostly used in sport photos but i can't find it anywhere...
16 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
File: filter.jpg (138KB, 1080x1350px) Image search:
[Google]
138KB, 1080x1350px
>>
File: filter 4.jpg (205KB, 1080x1350px) Image search:
[Google]
205KB, 1080x1350px
>>
Madonna bruttissimo
File: Screen Shot 2016-12-26 at 1.34.42 PM.png (680KB, 598x750px) Image search:
[Google]
680KB, 598x750px
How'd you do this year /p/? post your best nine including the total likes
https://2016bestnine.com/
163 Posts / 22 Images
View this topic
>>
Holy shit this is probably the most cancerous way of measuring "success" I've ever actually seen.
it assumes your most popular social media posts are the best photos, disregarding context (like, GEE, MAYBE YOU GOT ENGAGED THIS YEAR AND MADE A POST ABOUT IT)
>>
>>2989680
Ive seen hundreds of better versions of all of these.
Is photography like collecting pokemon to you?
>>
>>2989684
Savage from anon, but he's right. All images these are cliche
File: eos-rebel-t6-3q-d.jpg (67KB, 675x450px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 675x450px
>told my girlfriend a few months ago offhand I'd be interesting in getting a DSLR
>surprises me with a Canon EOS rebel t6
I know /p/ dosent like canons so what am I in for?
21 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
As good as any for a beginner, just take a lot of shots.
>>
REEEE
>>
>>2989081
buy a 50 1.8 if you want iq, stick with the kit lens if zoom is more important to you, iq will be a bit shit tho