File: 1475087797890.png (721KB, 830x987px) Image search:
[Google]
721KB, 830x987px
Best free video editing software?
Any tips from you guys would mean a lot.
Really could use something easy to understand, I'm not a professional
14 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
If you dont mind optimizing Interface yourself: Blender.
If you dont Care about encoding anything above FHD: DaVinci Resolve
Also, should have gone into /vid/ instead
>>
>>2979300
Adobe after effects
/thread
File: IMG_3310.png (1MB, 1125x2001px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1125x2001px
>Muh B&W
Fuck you TIME
16 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
That's a big image
>>
>>2979136
For you
>>
>>2979137
/thread
File: canon_0591c003_eos_rebel_t6i_dslr_1116101.jpg (359KB, 2000x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
359KB, 2000x2000px
Requesting help on choosing a camera please! My wife wants a camera for Christmas and has tasked me with researching which one to get her (for under $500). Me being the lazy mofo that I am, decided to come here first and ask you guys! Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
still lurking
>>
>>2979103
Just get her a Canon Rebel so you can stay being a lazy bastard
File: wet-plate-photo.jpg (74KB, 492x570px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 492x570px
Theres a wet plate collodion workshop soon in my city. Anyone does this type of photo here?
9 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2979062
Only read about it. I'd love to try it but at the end of the day I'm sure I'd prefer just doing large format photography.
>>
>>2979351
but the fucking look m8. no matter how big is the film area, its still film. this is a different thing.
>>
How do they scan these things in?
finally got internet again for a while. pic dump for a few
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Macintosh) Photographer omi Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:24 03:25:33 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1323 Image Height 743 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
49 Posts / 24 Images
View this topic
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1359 Image Height 849
>>
File: 4 copy.jpg (877KB, 1404x790px) Image search:
[Google]
877KB, 1404x790px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh) Photographer omi Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:29 19:50:56 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1404 Image Height 790 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh) Photographer omi Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:29 19:51:10 Exposure Time 1/40 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1404 Image Height 878 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
File: Capture 001.jpg (238KB, 1616x1082px) Image search:
[Google]
238KB, 1616x1082px
Yo. If you guys dig JDM cars, have a look at this instagram profile.
https://www.instagram.com/yama.furiku/
Link any other cool profiles below
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Jazz Image-Specific Properties:
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Thats some fucking awful photos you got there bruh.
>>
>>2978392
95% of your snapshit is garbage. Lurk more, stop using instagram, get better.
>>
>>2978392
you are also a joke on /o/
did they kick you out?
B&W Illford delta 400, Color Agfa Vista Plus 200
Shot with Canon 500N with Tamron 18-200.
Some critique?
>Didnt hold long enough in fix, so some b&w film got yellowish shit around but fixed by making it b&w in LR.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model 8800F Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:12:06 11:55:50
23 Posts / 18 Images
View this topic
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model 8800F Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:12:06 11:55:58
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model 8800F Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:12:06 12:06:22
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model 8800F Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:12:06 11:56:09
Anonymous
First Camera: Travelling 2016-12-05 02:40:53 Post No.2977830
[Report] Image search: [Google]
First Camera: Travelling 2016-12-05 02:40:53 Post No.2977830
[Report] Image search: [Google]
I'm flying to Europe in 5 days, prior to that I will be purchasing my first rig. I'm getting an a6000 with the kit lens, a sigma 60mm f/2.4, and a fujian 35mm.
I will be visiting a number of various locations, would this combo of lenses satisfy me enough, or would you recommend anything else? Also it's gonna be cold as fuck in Europe, would this affect the gear in anyway?
41 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
where are you flyining?
it' s not cold as fuck in the most part of Europe, I don't think your gear will have have problems dealing with
what kind of photos do you usually do?
>>
>>2977835
Might be cold enough to affect battery life slightly.
>>
It sounds like he's new to cameras in general.
First off unless your main goal of the trip is photography I'd look at getting a more convenient setup of a decent wide to short tele walk-around lens. Switching lenses all the time is a major hassle when you're traveling and walking around all day. The little sacrifice in IQ is worth the convenience. Maybe one of the Sigma/Tamron 17-50 2.8 lenses.
If you insist on primes both of those seem like bad picks, the Sony camera is a crop sensor so 1.5x the equivalent. A 35mm becomes 52.5mm and 60mm into 90mm. 35mm is pretty night on crop for a travel lens, especially around small streets and alleys where you physically can't just back up. You'll probably want at least an 18mm in these situations.
Also keep in mind if you have a local photography store they may do lens rentals or there are also tons of lens rental sites where you can get a good lens for a week.
File: IMG_2357.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3264x2448px
I need help /p/
I bought an oldschool SX-70 for my girlfriend for christmas. It came in the mail today so I tested it out, using Impossible Project film. The damn this won't take a picture and won't eject. I hear the gears turning inside but it doesn't actually work. I spent $200 bucks on this thing with all the film. Where do I go to get it fixed?? Is it something I could fix on my own?
18 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
take it back to wherever you bought it and demand a new one plus a gift card
bring your gun
>>
>>2977689
$200! shit you got robbed. demand a refund inmediately and get her an instax
>>
>>2977689
What's your job?
File: WinterTrees2.jpg (1MB, 4608x3252px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4608x3252px
>go /out/
>snowing
>grab camera take abunch of pictures
my composition could have been better but my sister started rushing me because she got cold
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX530 HS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4608 Image Height 3456 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2016:12:04 16:49:29 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/4.0 ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.21 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3252 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
the other pics are pretty shit because I was changing different apertures in every shot
this is the only one that was ok
>>
>>2977489
>I was changing different apertures in every shot
Wth does it mean?
Your photo isn't good because there are some plants popping out of nothing
>>
>>2977490
the f stop setting
File: download (2).jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 225x225px
Alright /p/ros,
My girlfriend got me a poloroid instax mini for my birthday I love the gift but others seemed skeptical is that camera too feminine
Pic related that color
39 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
It's a fucking camera, who gives a shit what it looks like.
>>
>>2976136
Well said
>>
What filter and camera should I use to achieve this effect? First time on /p/, sorry.
31 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2976124
Looks like a smartphone/compact camera snapshot with a strong magenta tint.
Be more specific. What do you like about it? Then we can help you do it to a different photo.
>>
>>2976128
it's a really hipster-looking photo? not sure how to describe it. I know nothing about photography.
pic somewhat related
>>
>>2976128
this one is pretty cool too.
File: Sigma-17-50mm-f-2.8-EX-DC-OS-HSM-Lens-Top-with-Hood.jpg (50KB, 575x423px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 575x423px
I'm currently looking for a new lens for my Canon 70D.
I have these two options :
* SIGMA 17-70MM F2,8-4 Contemporary
* SIGMA 17-50MM F2,8
Which one would you recommend ?
22 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
I would get the 17-50mm bc it's faster overall and sharper at 17mm but ymmv. Here's some reviews:
http://www.lenstip.com/256.4-Lens_review-Sigma_17-50_mm_f_2.8_EX_DC_OS_HSM_Image_resolution.html
http://www.lenstip.com/366.4-Lens_review-Sigma_C_17-70_mm_f_2.8-4.0_DC_Macro_OS_HSM_Image_resolution.html
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/531-sigma1750f28os?start=1
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/517-sigma1770f284osapsc?start=1
>>
>>2974951
2.8 constant
>>
>>2974951
17-70
Versatility is more important than lol bokeh, I'm sure you already have a nifty fifty for that purpose.
File: IMAG0868.jpg (1MB, 2688x1520px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2688x1520px
Extreme beginner looking for advice. This was taken on my HTC One m8 phone as that's (very sadly) the best camera I currently have access to. I know, the quality sucks, but I'm trying to do my best with what I've got.
This is the original photo straight off the phone. What could I do better in terms of framing/angle/exposure, etc.?
24 Posts / 13 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMAG0868 - Edited.jpg (753KB, 2688x1520px) Image search:
[Google]
753KB, 2688x1520px
>>2974884
Here's my attempt at an edit. Do you find it better or worse than the original? What could I do better?
>>
Don't park your bike so close to your background. When you're using a phone camera, you need a shitload of space between the subject and the background to get a decent blur.
Go take your bike up to an elevated place with a view, or to an isolated road. You need a better background.
As far as the actual shot, you've cut off the mirror and it looks kind of awkward. Either get the whole bike in the shot, or move in on a particular section, like the brake discs or the back with something interesting framed by the back fender.
You can take great photos with any camera, but with a shit one you need to be more creative.
>>
>>2974889
Thanks for the advice. I had the idea to move farther away from the background just as I was leaving, but I didn't have time to move and retake photos. Maybe I'll try again.
I totally agree a better background would help. I chose this spot because it was the only place I could find at the time with decent light (night time), and low light does not play too well with phone cameras in my experience. When I get a chance I'll see if I can try again someplace more interesting.
Thanks for the suggestion about the mirror. I did it this way intentionally because if I'm slightly farther away the camera seems to lose a LOT of detail, so I tried to pretty much fill the frame with the bike. In retrospect though, a bit less detail from moving back just enough to get the mirror in would probably be a worthwhile tradeoff.
Thanks again for the suggestions.
File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (81KB, 1366x768px) Image search:
[Google]
81KB, 1366x768px
Why does it seem like photography technology isn't making any progress? Megapixels keep going up but image quality seemingly isn't improving at the same rate.
77 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
making quality glass is expensive - try a quality lens vs a kit lens and even there you can see the difference.
You also have to appreciate that the full frame sensor is simply not big enough to render huge high res images. You have to start at medium format, which means bigger cameras and bigger lenses.
Plus you have to consider pricing - you have to have a way of tempting people into buying more expensive glass. You do that by telling them that more expensive = more image quality.
>>
Because you're an impatient little faggot.
>>
>>2974788
Ever heard of a Lytro camera?
Dual Pixel raw?
Pixel Shift focus?
But while we are here, what exactly needs progression in photography? People still use film, and nobody has "progressed" that technology for decades.