Worth it? They're having a 1/2 off sale, so this is actually 30

File: IMG_20170804_155854.jpg (3MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3024x4032px

Got it anyways

>>3127046
G L
L

>>3127046
>>3126955

>he actually bought it

wew

pretty overpriced, senpai

>>3127046
You could have found an actual Minolta with a non-garbage thread off eBay with a better chance of it actually working for the same price.

>>3127046
get the fuck out of the left lane

>>3126955
That's not the important part.

It's a film camera, it basically costs too much money and time when shooting regardless what the initial cost was.

Only a few thousand photos and these $30 are already just a tiny fraction of what you actually spent. And hobbyists can do hundreds of thousands of photos in a decade. Okay, not on film 'cause that bankrupts most people, but you get the idea.

The fuck OP why did you get a film camera. Your granny probably has one of those in the attic if you ask her nicely. Film died two decades ago

File: CLGaDFcWUAEGYtJ.jpg (19KB, 576x409px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 576x409px

>>3127046

>>3127080
Honestly film helped me train myself to look for good shots instead of shooting 100 shots of the same subject.

I still bought a digital camera because that shit was expensive as fuck and there was no way to get them scanned well affordably

>>3127122
film looks better than digital faggot

>>3127080
>it basically costs too much money
If you spend more than 2 rolls per week you're retarded.

A FF camera + good lens will cost more than 2k. That's years of film+processing+scanning.

>>3129465
>he doesn't take thousands of pictures in the time span of only a few hours

nice meme

>>3126955
Well, you at least got a 50mm f1.7 K mount lens that can be used on a DSLR for $30. I guess that isn't too bad of a deal.

File: b2eb0d19-317f-484a-a1c8-7fc19e23893a.jpg (71KB, 700x757px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 700x757px

>>3129529
You have a good attitude.

>>3129529
MC mount, not K mount. But yes it's a decent price, the lens goes for about $25 on ebay, so for $30 and the camera that's not bad at all.

>>3129465
I'm a filmfag first and foremost, but this is just disingenuous. A D700+some decent Nikkor AF primes won't run you more than $1200-$1300.