Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: olympus-pen-f-camera-review.jpg (171KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
171KB, 1000x667px
Do you think people in the 60s got shit for using Micro Four Thirds?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.5 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:03:05 13:19:17 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness -0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 56.00 mm Image Width 1800 Image Height 1200 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>3139310
no, because the internet wasn't around then
>>
>>3139311
I bet gearfags were though.
>>
>>3139310
Half frame and 110 were mainly aimed at children, occasionally an overpriced adult version would pop up that was ridiculed by photographers and snapped up by old, wealthy asian men.
>>
>>3139310
Gene Smith endorsed them, but he shot on a screw Leica, so...
>>
>>3139310
Half frame is equivalent to aps-c crop tho
>>
>>3139310
that lens is usable on apsc.
the only problem is they're all foggy, full fungus and shit.
>>
>>3139310
Just because you're a photography failure doesn't mean you need to project your insecurities to an anime board.
Why don't you go outside and use your camera, and post to your facebook page that noone likes and gives you zero validation for wasting your money and time
>>
File: olmpuspenf-ad1.jpg (96KB, 614x871px) Image search:
[Google]
96KB, 614x871px
>>3139310
If you use film today, it's nice to get 72 exposures from a 36 exposure roll.
That 40mm lens is radioactive btw.
>>
>>3139501
I'm not a failure although nobody cares about my photos.
>>
I happen to have this camrea along with a 20mm 1.4 a 40mm 1.8 and a 3.5 150 and not quite sure what the f stop is on the 400mm but i have a 400mm lens, got it from my grandfather a bit ago, never use the dam thing thinking about selling it.
>>
>>3139755
>20mm 1.4
:^)
>>
File: 2457443400_73e32e3cbd_m.jpg (17KB, 240x159px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 240x159px
>>3139458
Wouldn't the equivalent to APS-C be actual APS?
>>
>>3139508
it's mind boggling that they actually made that kind of camera instead of just doing what everyone else is doing back then.
>>
>>3139764
aps-c film = 25.1 × 16.7 mm
half-frame 135 film = 18 × 24 mm
MFT sensor = 18 × 13.5 mm
110 film = 13 × 17 mm
aps-c and half-frame are more similar in area covered
MFT sensor is like half of half-frame. you'd really call it, quarter-frame. MFT is more like 110 format, so OP should be asking if people got shit for shooting 110 film cameras
>>
File: submin-pentax110-2.jpg (28KB, 400x300px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 400x300px
>>3139774
>OP should be asking if people got shit for shooting 110 film cameras
no because it was kinda fun as a laugh kinda like the Minox. no one ever took them seriously though
>>
>>3139774
This. The thing that is sort of m43 in half frame is that it's 4:3 instead of 3:2. I actually like that.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4