How does it make you feel to listen to these speeches? Does it shock you that humans can have such a capacity for evil that they can speak so openly about such actions?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a_cmbi3iIg
>>2185058
b-but muh holocaust nevur hapent XD
Your statement presupposes that Germans can be considered human.
>>2185088
I think the fact that they speak so openly and pathologically is the most precise depiction of evil.
It is not something which is huge and scary, it is underlying, something which lurks in all of us and which all of humanity has the capacity to express.
>hur dur I don't care if the government spies on me
Why do plebeians aka the majority of the working/middle class have no concept of history?
>caring that the government spies on you
Stop selling cocaine over Snapchat Dayeezus.
>>2184979
le if youve got nothing to hide youve got nothing to fear
epic!
>>2184979
INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY
Prussia thread
>>2185011
Laughing at your life
What do you think about the Bahá'í Faith?
>>2184785
>not Christian
Into the lake of fire it goes!
>>2184788
I've always been fascinated by how divided Christianity is. Why so many sects?
>>2184785
It's weird to think they are an Abraamic faith. I imagine it would be a positive influence in the middle east because instead of radicalism it pushes "spiritual evolution" - this is reminescent of what the RCC does when it "clarifies" it's doctrine, keeping it from becoming the mess that is American Christian fundamentalism.
How come romance language countries have food that is much more accessible and loved by the International community while germanic language countries' foods are viewed only as pleasant by those who grew up eating them?
Why do people from all across the world like the sound of romantic languages but think germanic languages sound grating and angry
>>2184736
>Germanic
Bavarian Austro-Hungarian cuisine is absolutely fantastic. It's really not fair to lump them in with the likes of Sweden and Iceland who eat literal rotten fish shit and ovine heads.
>>2184753
*Bavarian AND Austro-Hungarian
I was thinking to myself after watching Man In the High Castle about alternative history.
Would the USA be better off if we had a nemesis like the Soviet Union around?
Also, wouldn't we be better off if China stayed Maoist and did not embrace market capitalism and therefore not take away millions of manufacturing jobs.
I mean all we got to worry about today is ourselves and terrorist Islam.
Sure people would have a bad time living in those countries, but viewing this nationalistically, would we not have better patriotism, economy, technology, space program and all sorts of other things when we had something to fight against?
Now its just all social issues that we worry about.
Also wouldn't Europe be better off, not having immigration problems?
Hell Afghans could have all been forced to be state atheists instead of radical Muslims and opium dealers.
Though I'm not sure how the Soviet Union could have still existed. Maybe if Stalin had purged Khrushchev and Beria was successful in keeping Stalinism around (or at least someone put Brezhnev in a gulag).
>>2184728
You are fucking retarded if you believe anything you just wrote
>>2184743
How so? Is the USA better off fighting with itself?
I'm not saying the Soviets should have won, I'm saying the Soviets threat would have made America a better place to live in.
Or are you saying the presence of Communism would make America a shit hole?
>>2184743
How would History have gone differently if The Golden Horde adopted a more aggressive settlement policy in the Russian Region instead of a peaceful Taxation one?
>>2184599
Are you implying they had the resources?
Their only motivation was to conquer new lands, find new soil for their horses to feed
>>2184630
t. Crusader Kings 2 player
>>2184599
They should have exterminated the Russian "people"' desu
What was his fucking problem?
What's your fucking problem?
dude I know more about farming than some dumb peasants LMAO
He really, REALLY, did not like sparrows.
It's common to read in textbooks about the well-known "splendour period" in Muslim Spain. It's true cities increased their population as a result of the Muslim arrival. Arabs created laws, public institutions..To sum up, I'd say a new model of society was established. However, I don't think three main religions (Christians, muslims, jews) lived peacefully. There was even a clear division between Muslims: arabs were the powerful statment and North África muslims didn't have any power in goverment functions. Christians (mozárabes) lived in suburbs and paid high taxes because of their religion.
>Was Al-Ándalus a real multicultural and splendid state?
>>2184527
>it's another Andalusia was a oppressive hellhole where muslims raped their innocent christian neighbour and ate live babies thread
No different from British India or any other imperial holding.
>>2184527
>However, I don't think three main religions (Christians, muslims, jews) lived peacefully.
If you're judging "peace" based on modern standards, you've already failed at interpreting history.
By contemporary standards, Andalusia was pretty peaceful for long stretches of time. Until the Berbers chimped out, you could be reasonably secure as a Jew or Christian to know that you wouldn't be pogrammed for most of the Cordoba era and the Taifa periods. This is why Jews actually did pretty well in Spain, all things considered, and experienced a "Jewish Golden Age," in parallel the Andalusian "Islamic Golden Age," in terms of medicine, philosophy, etc.
>>2184549
Don't look at us. The same people who spread black legend tier propaganda about European colonization put Muslim occupied Iberia on a silver platter.
Did Diogenes actually contribute anything of value to philosophy or is he only remembered for his zany biography?
he was the first irl shitposter
Did you really need to start up a new thread for this?
>>2184490
Where else would I post it?
>no you are wrong your argument relies on axioms
>ok then show me why these axioms arent self-evident
>nah i just dont care about them and disregard them without presenting any argument or using any rationality or logic
Why do people worship this pseud again?
>self-evidence
>not the biggest spook of them all
"it's true because I said it's true"
>>2184393
>self-evident
literally not an argument
>>2184410
but that's exactly what stirnerists believe, if they even believe in truth at all
Why is the state the only body we give a monopoly of violence to?
>>2184242
If we gave it to someone else it wouldn't be a monopoly.
>>2184251
You could give it just to me, though.
ITT: /his/ redflags for a woman.
>she never read any of Dante's works, not even Commedia
t. Dante Alighieri
>>2184162
>women
>can read
>not a read flag
>>2184162
> Ask her what period in history she would like to have lived in.
> Says the late 20th/ early 21st centuries because women have had a mostly terrible time up until then.
A subcategory of women with no imagination generally.
Reminder that granting Home Rule to the uncivilised masses of Eire was a terrible idea.
Ulster unionists were and remain the rightful heirs to the island of Ireland.
Of course you are correct, but this is the internet which means uninformed 'full blooded irishmen' from America are about to sperg out
>>2184146
me leaving the UK
>>2184157
tfw yuck mouth'd anglos think they're rightful rulers of Ireland.
>Reagan literally started a civil war in Nicaragua because their government was vaguely socialist
>>2184116
He didn't start it, he just funded and helped the rebels. Sometimes I feel funny about you Americans thinking your president is omnipotent or something. The same with Afghanistan, it's always "WE beat Russia" not giving any credit to the mujahedeen who you know, actually did all the fighting.
>>2184116
No he didn't ''literally'' start a civil war. Pick up a dictionary you underage figurative piece of shit.
>>2184127
In my experience it's usually "we did this we did that" for the boasting and "you did this you did that!" for anything that had negative drawbacks.