Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2060. page

>>2177917
He was so right about everything he spooked philosophers for decades to come.

>>2177929
marx debunked him less than a decade later though

>>2177947
>debunked him
And yet he was so incredibly hesitant to publish that debunking
Stirner scared a lot of prominent thinkers, rightly so.
>Karl Marx: like Nietzsche's, his reaction to Stirner deserves to be emphasized here, owing to its era-forming impact. Marx believed as late as the summer of 1844 that Feuerbach was "the only one who had achieved a true theoretical revolution." The appearance of »Der Einzige« in October, 1844, shook this outlook to the core, because Marx very clearly experienced the depth and implications of Stirner's criticism. While others, including Engels, initially admired Stirner, Marx saw from the beginning in him an enemy who needed to be annihilated.

>Marx had originally planned to write a review of »Der Einzige.« However, he soon forsook this plan, instead choosing first to wait for the reactions of the others (Feuerbach, Bauer). In his polemic work, »The Holy Family. Against Bruno Bauer and Company« (March, 1845), Stirner was simply left out. In September, 1845, Feuerbach's criticism of »Der Einzige« appeared -- and at the same time, Stirner's brilliant reply to it. Now Marx felt personally provoked to intervene. He interrupted important, previously commissioned works in order to storm upon »Der Einzige.« His criticism of Stirner, »Sankt Max,« which was full of invectives directed at the "flimsiest skull among the philosophers," turned out to be even longer than »Der Einzige« itself. Yet after the completion of the manuscript, Marx must have wavered again in his choice of tactics, as the criticism of Stirner remained in the end unprinted.

>>2176486
He'd fit right in at Clinton parties.

>>2176486
Lenin.

File: image.jpg (133KB, 628x900px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 628x900px

Not only the bigget monster in human history but also a Yonkie, a cousin fucker and he also had weird Shit fetishism

>>2176271
He was too late.

>>2176271
>genghis conquered and raped so much to compensate for the fact that he was cucked
at last i finally understand

File: 1429405920748.png (333KB, 749x589px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 749x589px

>>2176311
Wow really made me think!

>>2187727
Gee whiz I dunno probably because murdering is morally wrong?

>>2187748
It was mostly justice or self defense though

>>2187727
Boredom.

It's another "reduce history to Wikipedia k/d ratios".

File: ASSadbat.jpg (6KB, 172x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 172x200px

>>2184595
The Russian second army was all but completely destroyed and totally fucked the Russian offensive how is that not a BTFO?

>>2184619
Not to mention that the Russian commander was so upset at the loss he fucking offed himself.

>implying muh glorious proletarian uprising in Russia wasn't fostered by middle class as people

>>2184551
Actually the backbone of every fascist movement have been the poor workers and peasants. Look at German elections for example - the average Hitler voter was poor, rural and protestant, while the urban middle classes voted for either conservatives or socialists.

>Marxist commentator
I guess I should've stopped reading there, senpai.

>>2184573
>Actually the backbone of every fascist movement have been the poor workers and peasants.
>of every
In the rural italy everyone was either a socialist or an anarchist(just like in spain), the backbone of italian fascism was in fact the middle class.

In reality they do but he likes to pretend that he's a robot that isn't effected by emotion.But he is right that emotional arguments shouldn't be justified because it leads to everyone playing the victim card

>>2182849
https://youtu.be/W5x42MArLPQ

This entire video is appeals to emotion and the use of emotional rhetoric in the place of an actual argument.

Appeal to emotion can be an argument, but there has to be more than that. If all you're saying is it hurts my feefees then it's not an argument.

>>2182625
>Also, Is having a state curch or a state sponsored religion a sing of not being secular?
Being as though being secular is lacking any religious basis, yes.

>>2182641
Afaik England (not the UK) and Denmark are the major example for this. Would you say religious freedom is not granted in those states or that religion has a major impact in the policy and laws of those states?
Their society is entirely secular, so im inclined to call them secularized states non the less.
>yes, I know a catholic cannot become king of England

File: 1469772253530.jpg (117KB, 489x453px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 489x453px

>at where the effects? Is it true that Europe/the West only dominated the world after Religion got btfo?
not really. The importance of religion rose during the 1500s, 1600s and even as late as early 1800s for the last time but yeah, I do suppose one of the deciding factors for the west blowing the fuck out of the rest of the world was secularism

>Everyone who knew hitler said he was a very nice person and a very respectful gentleman.
Oh well I guess you're right. He may have killed millions of people but if he was a nice guy then he can't really be evil.

Without the Second World War we may have not gotten nuclear power, so we would have gotten our energy from burning coal and wood, nice thing about the nuclear power is that we can bury the nuclear waste that will become harmless in couple of hundred years and when that is happening we can try to create fusion reactor.
Imagine if 60 000 0000 people that died in the Second World War didn't die 70 years ago, millions of them would have gotten children and they would have gotten their own children, their homes would have been powered by coal and wood destroying ecosystem or they would live in medieval era without energy.
Thanks Hitler for a decent present time and future.

File: 1471863117661.jpg (392KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 800x800px

/pol/ go home. You have a bad taste in despots.

>>2181196
And?
I would argue that 3 is the worst looking, actually.
But what's the point of this thread?

>>2181196
>tfw ugly type

>>2181245
Discuss ideals of male beauty.

>>2181114

It's a fucking comicbook, why would you assume it's accurate in any way whatsoever?

>>2181114
Do you not know how an axe works?

>>2181114
That is not going to cut anyone's head off. That's going to sever his spinal cord at the neck and imbed itself halfway through his esophagus. He's gonna die, but it's not going to be instant or painless, although the pain is going to be just at the severed nerve endings still attached to his brain.

I think changing history would be catastrophic. It could set off a butterfly effect.

>>2180751
Yeah, you could shoot an archduke and end up causing two of the bloodiest wars of history.

If you change history, you cease to exist.
Not a fan of that paradox.

>>2180584
>Playing real nations

>>2180584
Yeah fuck Civ VI seriously

>>2180584

I've only played 1, 3, and 4.

I like playing Aztecs and conquering Spain.
I like playing militaristic civs like Zulu and going for the peacemongering scientifically advanced democratic cultural victor civ.
I like playing America as a communist warmonger.
On Chieftain I found all the religions and spread Taoism to America and Christianity to Khmer, etc.

It's a shame they couldn't block the path to Berlin

>>2179951
Can't you fuck off to /k/ with your infantile tank threads?

>>2179951

Goddamn it Hans, now you've held up the whole column. Why the fuck couldn't you have asked for a practical tank?

Persiaboo.

>>2179575
Greeks for a e s t h e t i c s
Rome for being cool and powerful

File: RomeBritain.jpg (285KB, 2109x1000px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 2109x1000px

>>2179575
>Romeboo
Just for the fact that they were everything an empire should be. They also had a pretty badass fighting force, and I could even go to the point of saying that they were the best cohesive force pre-1900. While they did not have the whole education centered mindset, their engineering skill was superb and many of their constructions are still here today.