https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyjKDMVYV5s&t=0s
>advanced underground aqueduct systems that are 3000 years old
>advanced "wind catcher" systems that ventilate interiors with no energy input
>huge monumental palaces
>the creation of the dome
>first planned urban gardens
>most advanced bronzework of ancient world
>>2212008
What do u mean by Persia? It's like u would say China..
Because of the narrative about all civilization beginning with the greeks before the torch being passed to the romans.
In this story the dirty iranians are the "other" that only exist to be defeated by the handsome europeans.
What are some more weird occurances like this, where enemies end up on the same side? I've got another example
>>2211966
>>2211967
they must have been so sick of the war to do this
>>2211967
I still can't believe they've never made a movie about this, it's definitely one of those "real life is stranger than fiction" moments.
Can we get a Marxist history thread?
What was Marx's take on the French revolution?
>>2211944
>Marxist history
>history
>>2211950
Ebin /r/eddit post.
>>2211944
Bourgeoisie taking power from the nobility.
>ITT: History jokes
Mine are going to be shitty, though.
>want to hate protestants
>not enough irish enough to
>>2211825
i know 1 (one) history joke. it goes something like this:
>
>
>
>>2212548
I know another joke, it's the cadet branch family that became best-known as an American liquor.
>>2211825
Two miserable templars are sitting under a palm tree.
-Boy, is this crusade shit.
-Yeah, wish I was home, I don't even remember why we came here to fight anyway.
-Lame. Everything here is lam-
>DEUS VULT
Why does he say he isn't a historian?
Why does /r/askhistorians hate him so much?
It's kind of like how John Stewart would say that he isn't really news, it's just comedy. It's so if he makes some bullshit assertion, he can just fall back on lol I'm just a history fan.
He's not a historian, so he says he isn't.
He entertains with historical stories.
>>2211811
>Why does /r/askhistorians hate him so much?
Do they?
Why did Hannibal ultimately fail? How the fuck did Rome not capitulate after so many years of getting stomped?
Because Carthage didn't send reinforcements.
>>2211810
Was his army not large enough to lay siege to Rome, even directly after his victory at Cannae?
Rome knew he was running on borrowed time.
>three major races
>hundreds of identifiable ethnicities
>6 major religions each numbering in tens of millions
>22 official languages and hundreds of dialects
>huge societal and economic disparities
>1.3 billion population
>pic related
/his/ explain how they have still survived as a country and developing when so many post-colonial countries in asia and africa are struggling
>>2211749
Upper caste economic elite who know what they're doing.
>>2211754
They actually don't but they are keeping up appearances which is still very important.
through threatening online retailers on another continent with banishment for selling doormats with their flag on it
Who are some historical figures who would probably be considered autistic today?
Pic related
How exactly was Wellington a sperg?
>>2211610
>He rarely showed emotion in public, and often appeared condescending to those less competent or less well-born than himself (which was nearly everyone). However, Álava was a witness to an incident just before the Battle of Salamanca. Wellington was eating a chicken leg while observing the manoeuvres of the French army through a spyglass. He spotted an overextension in the French left flank, and realised that he could launch a successful attack there. He threw the drumstick in the air and shouted "Les français sont perdus!" ("The French are lost!").[202] After the Battle of Toulouse, an aide brought him the news of Napoleon's abdication, and Wellington broke into an impromptu flamenco dance, spinning around on his heels and clicking his fingers.
>>2211637
>He rarely showed emotion in public
>an aide brought him the news of Napoleon's abdication, and Wellington broke into an impromptu flamenco dance, spinning around on his heels and clicking his fingers.
>and realised that he could launch a successful attack there. He threw the drumstick in the air and shouted "Les français sont perdus!"
Pick one you frog
From being on the chans I always people say that transgender people should be committed to insane asylums. Not sure why, but just a few minutes ago I decided to consult the ol' Google machine about the history of U.S. insane asylums, which no longer are in operation by the way, and how they treat individuals who experience feelings of gender dysphoria also previously known as gender identity disorder also previously known uncertain if such a diagnosis were made.
I found plenty of results for the history of insane asylums, but they usually seem to focus mostly on patients with disorders such as schizophrenia, etc. I have found nothing in regards to transgender patients. This leads me to question if people were ever committed for such things. Surely, they had to have been, right?
Would people who are transgendered be committed to the insane asylums of the past and if so, how would they be treated by other patients and the staff?
Like now it wasn't really seen as a disorder but as odd behaviour.
For the most part these people were never "ound out" because they lived very secretive lives in fear of what the rest of society thought.
>>2211586
People who say insane asylum are just being edgy.
The only reasonable response is to be medicated to balance out the brain.
Science and society weren't ready at the time to understand or fully comprehend what being a tranny was. I'm sure most were beaten to 'set em straight' or just socially shunned until they conformed.
>>2211586
>schizophrenia
>transgender
That's the same thing.
Realistically, what would happen if Pope Francis or the next Pope actually called for a new crusade to combat the spread of Islam and ISIS in the Middle East and Africa?
Would any current states actually officially back the movement?
Any leaders?
Would it have any effect?
Would random Christians from across the world actually take up arms?
If so, what would the result be?
I would legitimately fucking go. I'm not doing anything worthwhile right now anyway, I might as well be part of history and stop the cancer of Islam.
Deus Vult
>Would any current states actually officially back the movement?
The only one I can really think of would be the Phillipines
>Any leaders?
See above
>Would random Christians from across the world actually take up arms?
Probably but not a lot Im guessing. Crusading seems to be somewhat anachronistic today and against Church teachings of love and tolerance and you know the whole "Thou Shalt Not Kill" thing.
>If so, what would the result be?
Probably a disorganised mess. If they are trying to carry out an effective conventional war against a non-state actor, then the Nation State has proven to be the most capable in organising such endeavours.
I wonder how many Protestant Americans would suddenly become Catholic for an excuse to go shoot brown people.
What's the best history book you've ever read?
>>2211458
The bible
The Bible.
The Bible
Was paying for sex normal in the ancient times or was it always looked down on?
>>2211407
what prostitution? Yes it was normal in multiple cultures.
>pic
Interestingly enough Shia Islam still promotes one night marriage stands in Shia territories, while Sunnis have long abandoned the practice that Muhammad gave.
Yes, prostitution has been quite prominent in human history and in the Anglosphere it only became a shame under the Victorian era and even with that it was only frowned upon amongst the upper class.
it's called the oldest profession for obvious reasons
Who was the greatest general in history?
>>2211387
Spartacus
>>2211389
Got his shit wrecked by Crassus, who was a mediocre general.
>>2211387
Hannibal Barca, history's greatest BLACK general :^)
Modernity is the true "dark ages".
The Medieval world was the true age of enlightenment.
BASED
A
S
E
D
Then go to Swaziland where there's an absolute Christian monarch and medieval standards of living.
>>2211410
Back to /r/atheism with you, fiend!
>implying it isn't whites who makes things great and Christianity + European culture created high civilization
>implying it wasn't the middle ages that gave rise to the modern ages
>inb4 /pol/
>>2211318
BASED
A
S
E
D
I mean, he's not wrong.
If we look at Christian Civilization as a society, industrialism and modernism is the age of decadence before the fall where idiots like >>2211410 crop up.
We should go back to the numerous societies which were communes but not communistic.
The Medieval world gave us progress.
Cut out the Middle Ages and none of this would be here.
If something bad happened with America, we as the 2nd biggest democracy by absolute numbers of population and military would have to march to protect the western world.
How does this makes you feel /his/?
>The future is 25 years ago already.
Sorry, but it'd be the EU.
The EU sucks though, so really it'd be the Chinese and Japanese maintaining order in their own little sphere while the west falls into terminal decline.
>>2211315
Warmaking capacity has far more to do with GDP than it does with population.