do you like him?
jew
Herem
How important was Yugoslavia to ww2 and what was its role, why were casualties so high
Gateway to the Middle East and oil?
>The Yugoslav government estimated the number of casualties to be at 1,704,000 and submitted the figure to the International Reparations Commission in 1946 without any documentation.[77] The figure included war related deaths but also the expected population if war did not break out, the number of unborn children, and losses from emigration and disease.[78] The same figure was later submitted to the Allied Reparations Committee in 1948 but was claimed to be only from war related deaths.[78] After Germany requested verifiable data the Yugoslav Federal Bureau of Statistics created a nationwide survey in 1964.[78] The total number of those killed was found to be 597,323.[78] The list stayed a state secret until 1989 when it was published for the first time.[16]
Looks like a relatively moderate number
>>2211881
Because Croats killed 700 000 Serbs
Hey /his/. Fa/tg/uy here.
I'm running a campaign set in medieval England (1200-1400ish, pretty much just before the War of the Roses), and whilst I'd usually just wing it, I'm a bit of an autist when it comes to historical accuracy, so I want to make sure I've gotten some things right. I've looked online for answers, but I've not been able to find anything to help me out too much. Anyway, I'm mostly wondering about the general life of knights and lesser nobility, though more specifically;
At the time, were knighthoods hereditary?
How would a "normal" (not a knight or peer) become a knight?
Could a lesser peer (Baron, for example) grant a knighthood, or is that something only the ruling monarch could do?
What sort of station would the close family members of a knight be granted? What sort of life would they lead?
Anyway, if you could help me out by answering any of those questions, it'd be a great help. I've studied the era in question before, but apparently not enough. Cheers.
>pic not related, but pretty cool
Sorry if this seems a little retarded, by the way. It's mostly because I am a little retarded.
>>2211758
>At the time, were knighthoods hereditary?
Almost all knights were landed knights, a knight is both a job and a patrician title although it was the lowest rank among the nobility. The son of a knight would have started martial training at a young age, then as an adolescent serve as a squire to another knight. When he came of age he could be knighted himself if he so desired, but not all did. Many chose to remain squires their whole lives out of financial necessity.
>How would a "normal" (not a knight or peer) become a knight?
the term was commoner, and they could get knighted through distinguishing themselves in combat, however you needed to have means to accept a knighthood since it came with obligations of military service, but you were expected to furnish your own horse, arms and armor. So a mere commoner would not realistically be able to accept such an offer unless they had also made a significant amount of money from looting or came from a well off family. Many in the English army who distinguished themselves during the hundred years war would rather accept gifts instead of titles for distinguished service, that would allow advancement from say a longbowman to a mounted archer, or man at arms to sergeant at arms. These ranks were really more about what kind of equipment you could afford to bring with you than anything else.
>Could a lesser peer (Baron, for example) grant a knighthood, or is that something only the ruling monarch could do?
lesser nobles had the right to declare their own vassals
>What sort of station would the close family members of a knight be granted? What sort of life would they lead?
varied greatly depending on the size and value of the knight's estate
>>2211791
Ah right, that's really helpful, cheers.
On the matter of the value of a knights estate, what would it be likely to range from? From a lower end to a higher end?
Oh, and another thing I forgot to ask, could a knight be promoted to the peerage?
How have people/corporations increased their wealth in times of war? I'm looking for specific situations. Did these people ever experience retaliation after their profits were realized?
This sounds like homework
>>2211752
Nah, I'm just brainstorming for the inevitable civil/world war that I am anticipating. Once Trump leads us into war, I don't want to be left behind as a poorfagroup. Trump will be profiting, and I want to profit with him.
So, I'm thinking defense companies like General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin will have a demand to fill, Boeing will make airplanes, gun companies will be profiting by increased demand for guns...I'm sure some tech companies that create drones and hacking software will be involved.
But what else has happened, historically, that has caused profit from war? Did the Union profit from the confederacy? Was Japan hoping to to have anot economic boom after getting involved in wwii? I just want to start a discussion
Currency volatility, playing markets based on the lesser amount of resources being produced from that country.
It is:
>a good risk/reward profile, but not AMAZING
>there are actually millions of people that do it from all over the world
>hedge funds tend to only play commodity fluctutions from war
>corporations do compete for federal funding of military equipment and people bet stock on who wins
>most people betting directly on arms fluctations are individual investors
Thread where everyone talks about philosophy
>starts with the greeks once
>>2211476
>life
>meaning
To me, the point seems to be to leave behind some sort of legacy. In the case of most animals, or 'life the biological phenomenon' its purely the continuation of your genetics through offspring. If we're considering human life however, its more complicated. Sure the biological aspect is one option, but then you are no better than other lower beast. Surely, truely significant legacy, outside of the biological, as in artistic, scientific or social legacy is something unique to humanity and what one should strive for. To have a lasting effect on human civilization in one of theses three ways, to achieve something that puts you in the history books, never to be forgotten, for your epitaph to breath forthe knowledge to those of the future that will never know you. Legacy in culture. Is that the point? Is that the meaning of life?
>HOLY
>"United" ""Kingdom"" of """Great""" Britain and Northern """"Ireland""""
shit
>ROMAN
why is there no board to talk about religion?
Because they dont understand and dont want to understand because they're scared about their life and cznt comprehend or even think about ideas without implementing it with their own beliefs
>>2211299
What about /x/
>>2211299
there is. you're in it.
>He thinks understanding philosophy means reading it's product without learning the method.
>He fell for the bullshit artist meme of calling bullshit artists "philosophers".
fuck off facebook frog shit
>Pilled
>He hasn't progressed to powders or injections
>>2211252
Reminder to take it.
Jan 11, 2017
http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/11/14230448/moon-exact-age-calculated-nasa-apollo-14-samples
Scientists pinpoint the exact age of the Moon — and it’s older than we thought
Scientists say they have figured out the most precise age for the Moon than ever before, thanks to samples of lunar rocks gathered during NASA’s Apollo 14 mission. Analysis of the rocks pinpoint the Moon’s creation to 4.51 billion years ago, just 60 million years after the Solar System first formed.
This suggested age makes the Moon a lot older than some recent estimates, which claim our lunar neighbor is 4.3 or 4.4 billion years old. If the results are accurate, it means the giant impact that created the Moon must have occurred fairly early on in the Solar System’s history.
The Moon is thought to have formed from the leftover debris of a high-speed collision between Earth and a smaller planet-like object called Theia — and the timing of this event is important for figuring out when life formed here on Earth, too.
Our planet would have been completely wiped out by the giant impact, so life could not have started forming on Earth until after the planet became whole again in the wake of the collision. So knowing the Moon’s age gives us a good idea of when the Earth started to become a suitable place to live.
>>2211119
Does that mean it used to be a lot closer than we thought?
>>2211119
>a lot older
10% isn't a lot
What would a tour of invading Australia feel like for an infantryman?
>>2211096
>my feet hurt
>theres nothign to do except sniff petrol
>hope the drop bears don't get me
>>2211096
Probably pretty unpleasant, Australia is
>Hard
>Dry
>Hot
>Massive
On the upside terrain is not very extreme, quite flat
>>2211096
>there's a spider in my boot
>there's a snake in this APC
>that emu is giving me a shifty look
>is that gunfire I hear?
>oh no, it's just a lyrebird
/pol/ macros had me reading up on the stab-in-the-back myth, the more I read the more I'm convinced that a betrayal of sorts did take place, but it was actually the Oberste Heeresleitung at fault.
Basically the timeline and the actions of the very upper echelons of the OHL such as Ludendorff and Hindenburg look very suspicious, like they were trying to extricate themselves from blame for the peace negotiations. At the end of September at Spa, and already after some flip flopping and denial, the OHL informed the Kaiser of the need to surrender. Immediately afterwards the government was changed, the OHL was brought back under parliamentry control, and the socialist party was given significant power in the new regime. The OHL had carte blanche authority over the previous government and would have been in a good position to dictate surrender negotiations swiftly with good conditions for Germany. This all happened a month before the sailors uprisings (caused by the autism of the high command of the navy ordering a suicide cruise) which kicked off public unrest. The delays caused by the OHL's apparent weaselling from blame IMO were a key factor responsible in the collapse of Germany into unrest.
>>2210901
You're right. The irony of the back stab myth is that it was Ludendorff and Hindenburg who were the ones who fucked over germany and not the
>socialists
>jews
>communists
etc.
>>2210901
Yeah OHL needed to put out a peace deal as soon as the Russians collapsed before the Americans arrived.
But they were too autistic about reaching a honorable deal that they chimped out with a all out offensive that failed and then the Americans arrived anyways.
>Erzberger, if you don't sign the armistice, we're all FUCKED. Even if you can't modify and of the terms, please sign it for fuck's sakes. t. Hindenburg
>Later that same day
>Wooooooow, I can't believe he actually signed it. Those dirty rotten civilians, selling out the army. smdh
What's your philosophy on life?
I believe people are like tornadoes in the sense that we're the product of physical conditions.
Just as tornadoes are phenomena that occur only under specific physical conditions, life to also occurs under specific physical conditions.
I don't think there's a meaningful difference between humans and the actions we take and all other phenomena that occur as product of the physical conditions of a system.
>>2210655
>What's your philosophy on life?
>>2210655
My goal in life is to put my penis inside a vagina.
I have failed for the past 26 years.
>>2210655
To be great.
>tfw to smart to have Wikipedia take down your contribution to the article
It's been about 24 hours now bros, I think I may have contributed to wikipedia
What article I'll go ahead and report it
>>2210544
It was a Wikipedia article linked on here yesterday.
>>2210551
There were many
Armour you have made while camping thread
>>2210328
I stuffed newspapers in my socks because I forgot my shin guards for a soccer match
>>2210328
You know damn well you're the only person who does this shit
Op how do you make armor but while camping? Do you carry a tree stump as an anvil?
What should one study at university and why?
>patrician mode: no "muh _ (jobs, money, societal contribution)"
I'm guessing classical studies, arts/humanities, or philosophy provides one the highest pathos of distance to humankind?
Physics
>>2210285
>and why?
>>2210246
Classics or Maths are the patrician's choice.