Let's see what the educated people think.
What's hidden, or what was hidden, on Oak Island?
Pirate Nazi ninja Jewish gold
>>2208750
Red Rackam's Treasure.
>>2208750
>Oak Island
Your mothers used condoms...ITS A BIG HAUL!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMk4HgDj2LQ
Name a more feelsy song.
What I love about these sorts of songs is that they imply the United States will move on and be fine, which is sad because it accepts the anonymouse soldiers will eventually be forgotten. Nothing beats those sorts of feels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVB5wvigAgk
This theme is not as feelsy because it does not convey that the world will continue, indifferent to their deaths. It in fact fetishizes the dying soldier.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn_iz8z2AGw
For me the last post is less feelsy when its played very well for this same reason.
a lower quality yet more feelsy edition:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuA-KTH9IG8
Anybody else feel this way?
I like this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-48lW6Su_Y
You can make a big budget film or TV show surrounding any historical person, event or time period.
Required information for the picture which is unknown-scales of battles, appearances, motives and whatnot, all become known to you.
The only limitation you have is that the film needs to be relatively entertaining to the sort of people who would usually watch historical films.
What to do you make?
Time to make a big budget war epic out of 1939's Saar Offensive.
>tfw no good movie about Hugh O'Neill
>>2208471
>Spanish civil war.
or
>The reign of that one Chinese empress who murdered her own kids to remain in power
>augustus claimed he was 5' 9" in roman inches, aka 5' 7" today
so he was 5' 5" right
either was a decent height in his time
>>2208322
How tall was he average Greek? Would I have stood out at 5'10?
>>2208362
Killed on the spot for being a giant.
Let's play a game /his/.
You post two historical figures of mostly equal value, and then have to erase one from all any and all historical records while the other gets to stay intact.
I'll start us off:
>Julius Caesar or Jesus Christ.
>>2208313
I'd go with Caesar. There were plenty who would also do conquest, but the basis for Western morality? That's not something I want to do with out.
>Newton or Einstein
>>2208319
Newton.
Other people figured out Algebra and there were plenty of just as smart mathematicians around the same time/came soon after.
>Beethoven or Mozart
>>2208326
Mozart. Beethoven was a Romantic pioneer.
>Elisabeth I or Catherine The Great.
>tfw too intelligent to believe in Holodomor
>tfw too intelligent to subscribe to empiricism but too insincere to also subscribe to solipsism
You are denying a genocide carried by an evil dictator and his henchmen. That's horrible!
ok
>After extensive, and sometimes difficult, discussions, the churches in Germany agreed that the way to commemorate ecumenically this Reformation event should be with a Christusfest – a Celebration of Christ. If the emphasis were to be placed on Jesus Christ and his work of reconciliation as the center of Christian faith, then all the ecumenical partners of the EKD (Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Baptist, Methodist, Mennonite and others) could participate in the anniversary festivities.
Sounds a bit sensitive for my tastes but sect relation repairs/consolidation isn't a bad thi-
>Separating that which is polemical from the theological insights of the Reformation, Catholics are now able to hear Luther’s challenge for the Church of today, recognising him as a “witness to the gospel” (From Conflict to Communion 29). And so after centuries of mutual condemnations and vilification, in 2017 Lutheran and Catholic Christians will for the first time commemorate together the beginning of the Reformation.
I…uh…what?!?
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/weeks-prayer-doc/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20160531_week-prayer-2017_en.html
>paying attention to what the """"""""""""""""""""""""""""catholic""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""church"""""""""""" does after Vatican II
THIS JUST IN: POPE FAGLOVER II SAYS "ARGLBRBLRGRBLR" BECAUSE HE HAS MUSLIM, ORTHODOX, AND CALVINIST DICKS IN HIS MOUTH
>>2207836
>Luther
>Muslim, Orthodox, or Calvinist
good job anon, you managed not to name the one relevant group
>>2207842
i want to understand the phenomenology of how this non sequitur formed in your mind
>he doesn't know martin luther wasn't a muslim.. but i do..
??????????????????????
Post books about Central Asia
>>2207748
Is the Persian population of central asia virtually non-existent today post mongol invasion?
>>2208434
Yeah they are pretty much confined to a small nation in the mountains, it's quite small so you might not have heard of it. It's called Iran
>>2208434
Tajiks/Afghans are Iranian by definition, though they won't care to admit it nowadays
How in the ever loving fuck can anybody with more than a single brain cell believe the official story on the JFK assassination?
So what really happened? Was it da joos?
>>2207680
Cuba
>"You can't just march an army, including elephants, through the Alps and into It-
>>2207419
CARTHAGO
DELENDA
EST
>north african elephants extinct
WHY COULDN'T THEY LEAVE THEM ALONE
>>2207419
>>106579255
Friendly reminder the Democrats greatest hero was literally a Russian puppet
wtf i hate FDR now
Oh, are we just making shit up now?
>>2207422
>Gives up all of Easter Europe
>Has his administration filed with commie spies
>Making things up
sure thing junior
Why are muslims so much superior than christians?
I'm pretty sure history has shown time and time again that Jews > Christians > Muslims
>>2207381
Manichaeans > Jews > Christians > Muslims
>>2207380
http://www.meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars
How can one be sure that one knows anything? All knowledge or all supposed truths seem dependent, in the end, in some sort of assumption that is difficult to trace back or explain. One can put axioms out there and seem to get pretty far, but that's a kind of assumption as well.
Following up on this, how would you decide which initial truths or assumptions to accept? It seems like your selection of which fundamental beliefs to accept- whether or not the mind can really understand its surroundings as they are and not as they perceive it could be one, maybe- would probably be decided on based on even more arbitrary factors that would rely on assumptions.
How is this explained in philosophy? Who are some notable 'philosophers of knowing' or even thinking, and how might they answer these questions? Or if these questions are incorrect or say things incorrectly, why would that be?
The doubter cannot doubt the fact of his doubt.
>>2207305
don't you mean the doubter MUST doubt the fact of his doubt?
>>2207256
>How can one be sure that one knows anything?
try hard to keep your memories accurate.
> Following up on this, how would you decide which initial truths or assumptions to accept?
Do what seems logical to you. This will manifest to people throughout the world in different ways because we are raised differently but its the best we got to knowing truth.
For example, I was raised Christian and accept a form of the Christian doctrine as being true. I know of arguments for and against the religion, but the way I understand the religion seems logical enough to me for to be an accurate estimation of truth. This acceptance brings order to a chaotic universe, purpose to an disorderly existence and meaning to our lives as humans. If I was raised in Saudi Arabia, I'd probably be Muslim. If I was raised in Japan I might be Buddhist. But because I've been raised Christian and understand Christianity better than all those religions I've accepted in a form that appears logical to me.
What are the worst examples of political movements/leaders/institutions/et cetera that meant good but did bad?
>>2207005
bump
>>2207005
All of them?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiping_Heavenly_Kingdom
Are there any recorded instances of 2 homosexual rapists who each tried to rape the other?
those everyday situations resolve tossing a coin
>>2206574
lol. Isn't this called rough trade? except instead of both trying to rape each other, there's an aggressor and a guy who tries to fight him off, but only to delay the inevitable. I think its normally gay for pay type situations
>>2206574
That's just called consensual gay sex.