Is this still the definitive go-to history of Nazi Germany?
is long as fuck, never could finish it
>>2209912
No. And it never really was.
>>2209950
What do you recommend then?
I want a real peer-reviewed history book, so no /pol/ autism plz
Are the Berbers of North Africa descended from the Atlanteans?
If not where do they come from and why aren't they black?
>>2209860
Berber is a cultural group, not an ethnic one. There's both white and black Berbers
>>2209860
>If not where do they come from and why aren't they black?
Because Negroids are native to South of the Sahara.
>>2210330
Yes and No
https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/10/why-has-race-survived/
both Kant, Hume and others talked about how the white race was superior to other races
recent debate on this topic as arisen again
what are your thoughts?
>>2209854
No, it wasn't. But it was what brought the supremacy of the Europeans over the world. Up until the 17th century Europe was on par with other powers of the world, but when they ended the primate of Religion and put Reason, Science and Politics on the throne they became the dominant world power. The secularization of the age of enlightenment was responsible for Europe's success and the dominance over the world.
>>2209854
Its awesome because rejection of white supremacy caused the worst scenario of decolonisation. Niggers and latinas are in debris and finansial crysises, but their "independent states" are still under European and American power.
Their people had conquered the world and produced all of the immediate technology they could see. They hadn't experienced the 100 or so years of academic revisionism to correct the narrative so they were dealing with reality in its most tangible sense. Can't really blame them, they're empiricists after all.
Desire is the cause of suffering.
Let's try and devote our lives craving for reaching nirvana.
BRAVO BUDDHA
You're already doing it wrong, if you're actively craving to reach Nirvana.
nirvana isn't something you attain through normal means, it is a consequence of your changed mentality
>>2209751
aye, schizophrenia
So, we've seen the term fedora bandied about here frequently, but what exactly does the term entail?
We can be sure that the term has expanded past its origins as an appeal to style meant to shame atheists into silence, as it's used quite frequently in subjects not even remotely related to religion (art for instance). So we must look at the deeper traits of the idea, the basic patterns of behavior that were being mocked. Because although it was used to mock atheists in general, it did so by evoking a very specific stereotype of them; this being most observable in that iconic quote about being enlightened by one's own intelligence.
I look at the term, and I see within it a commentary on a deeper, and more pervasive pattern common among social awkward young men (though perhaps not exclusive to them). The sorts who have little social success and consider themselves to be above-average in their own intelligence. This behavior can be observed in a sort of "matter-of-fact," "common-sense," evaluation of things that refuses to consider the deeper, and ephemeral natures of things, and automatically considers a different perspective than their own to be borne of idiocy. The "fedora" has in their mind done all the growing they need to do, has shit figured out, and is now set to fix the rest of the world.
We see this among some atheists, in which they refuse to accept that the reasons for belief people experience feel very real to them and are not just wishful thinking or stupidity (to be fair, we see this with many Christians here as well, when it comes to other religions). We see this in art threads when they trot out Ilya Repin's famous work and refuse to consider that beauty does not mean strictly "pretty pictures" (or harmonious if they're particularly well-spoken) or that skill does not have to go into creating photorealism.
>>2209735
Is this really history or even humanities?
We can even see this among the trend towards authoritarian politics (traditionalism, fascism, Marxism-Leninism) among such individuals. Who see a society driven by values that to them are rooted in stupidity, weakness, or just plain moral degeneracy, and think the obvious solution is to force others to accept their own.
Now. in recognizing this tendency, I believe a betterment of our intellectual culture can be achieved. We've seen it happen before, when the Internet first exploded due to social media and the rise of smart phones, forcing geekdom to collectively look at themselves and see that their shit did indeed stink. An example of this can be found in the decline of the "Nice Guy" concept on the Internet.
>>2209753
Is examining ideas, personality traits, and sociological tendencies humanities?
>"Orthodox Christians have never believed the Earth is 6,000 years old or that Genesis was a literal account, that's just a Protestant heresy!!!"
>reading the works of the Porphyrogenitus from the 10th century
>literally refers to dates as "Year 6100 since the Creation" (Anno Mundi')
>>2209705
Orthodox Christians believe a lot of retarded, heretical stuff, and then try to claim they don't when called out on it.
>>2209710
that was a troll though. the trip isn't the same one used by Constantine
>>2209710
>muh heresy!
Can you Christcucks come up with something better?
We all know that there is no Utopian model for Empire
but one argument I have often heard is that the British Empire was the most progressive empire...that it actually brought alot of "good" to its subjects compared to other empires
Is this true? or is this just British propaganda
Propaganda.
Anglo lies
>>2209657
In the history of empires, the British were probably the most "enlightening" if that means anything
i still wouldn't call them progressive though
Does anyone else find it annoying how you can't have a reasonable discussion about ww2, much less the Nazis, without normies automatically jumping to the Holocaust and resorting to emotional disdain on the subject?
I find the Nazi Germany to be a fascinating subject that goes far beyond "They killed jews wtf" and people look at you to be a sociopath or racist if you don't say you hate Nazis and move on from the subject.
>Aren't I so fucking unique and edgy? I'm so unaffected and thick skinned. Please jerk me off.
>>2209451
This surface level interaction you describe is why I don't talk to normies
>>2209451
Pretty much. I mean I'm not a Nazi, but goddamn do I love talking about their political doctrine.
All human beings born on this planet have the inalienable right to live and travel where-ever upon its surface they see fit, without external hinderment. Thus, all borders must be abolished, for they violate this right in all those who live without them. Fight me, bitches.
>>2209440
No right is inalienable, save maybe the right to eventual death.
To institute your supposedly inalienable (yet already alienated) right, you would have to take away the right of others to form communities, freedom of association, the right to defense, and the right of identity.
You only have rights inasmuch as you can defend them, and others are willing to aid you in defending them.
Freedom is like traffic - everyone's happy until all the other cars get involved.
>have the inalienable right
>>2209440
>All human beings born on this planet have the inalienable right
Says who?
Are there false reports of how some scientific discoveries were made, but did they become popular with history and only recently the truth was discovered?
it is possible, but without evidence you can only speculate
>>2209266
can /his/ commission more historical shitposts from this guy?
>>2209266
Someone please make a Pepe Wojack image out of this.
Convince me why we should protect endangered animals.
>>2209254
It's not that difficult
Why shouldn't we?
They sometimes have beneficial functions we dotn understand yet or they are looking neat and serve an entertaining purpose.
How was boxing first perceived when it become a thing?
as a lowly sport for proles,or a place for aristocrats to rightfully show their place in society with fists?
was the sport criticized or hailed?
Personally I think it's just giving a public and a referee to a brawl. techniques developed later,in a rule-based sport.
>>2209120
Aristocrats and the upper classes have historically been more into fencing. The need to be able to defend oneself with ones fists is more of a modern thing when carrying bladed weapons became less common.
>>2209120
>he doesn't know about the secret all-colonial boxing tournament held in Buckinham Palace by the duke of kent during the victorian period
Started becoming interested in Pugilism. In the times before Queensbury rules became popular, The only rules being no hitting a man while he was down and no grabbing below the waist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS9izJnza18
Also some pugilism matches were fought toe to toe, with no movement or footwork allowed, first man who hit the floor was the loser.
Actual /his/ thread, 25 years rule etc. No d*cks-in-pigs or golden showers or cigars-in-interns
There was a guy named James Hammond from South Carolina who had sex with his teenage nieces. Plural. Nieces. Also, he was the governor.
He decided to campaign for the Senate, as one does, but his sister's family told reporters about him fucking their kids. He backed out in disgrace and hid from society for a few years, as one does.
Minding his time, he got one of his teenage slaves pregnant. When their kid reached puberty, he started having sex with her and of course got her pregnant. Multiple times.
The most amazing part of the story is that after all this publicly known incest, pedophilia, and nastiness, Hammond got elected to the Senate only a few years later.
Why elect such a debased human to represent the good people of South Carolina? Because he was a Secessionist.
This is the glorious culture Neo-Confeds claim to love.
>>2209103
We don't really know. Some pervert in his back shed could do all sorts of perverse things that aren't even recorded. If you mean "high profile people" be more specific.
>>2209105
P A T R I C I A N
We often get into arguments as to which country did the most work to win World War 2, but it seems we rarely discuss who which nation gave the most effort in the First World War?
So, /his/, which country did the most work in World War 1?
>>2209066
France, if you're talking for the Entente. I say this as a burgerclap. Germany, if you're talking overall.
>>2209066
France, Russia and Germany on their respective sides
Germany carried 3 useless allies... Imagine how easier it would be just 1 vs 1 against France.
did the British cause the famine or try to help people during it?
are proponents of the first theory just rabid irish nationalists?
>>2208973
nah, probably a virus coming from the US
It's not like they deployed the British Army to protect food exports from Ireland from starving peasants.
Oh wait, yes they did.
>>2208981
=D me wonders how they convince the soldiers to just go and commit genocide