You think there might be entire underground secret religions?
Yes.
Bill Cooper exposed them, and paid the ultimate price.
>>2543948
I could make up a religion right now and it would be my little secret.
The mystery schools worship Satan/Lucifer and hate the God of the Bible.
They steer the world in a certain direction.
They are behind atheism, evolutionism, communism, socialism and totalitarian ideologies.
Get in here barbarians
Talk philosophy, phalanxes, buttsex, and mythology
Overrated.
Eastern wisdom > Greek philosophy
>>2543928
I have a question. Many depictions of Hoplites, specifically more classical artistic pieces depict them as wearing full suits of bronze. However, there are also many depictions of them wearing linen vests.
Was the equipment for a hoplite self-bought? I'd imagine more wealthy citizens could afford suits of bronze, while less well-off citizens would buy the linen suits. Was there a restriction placed by the city on who wore what?
>>2544327
In ancient Greece you fought with what you could afford. The state places no restrictions on what you could or couldn't wear, but were expected to get the best gear they could afford.
Would you rather be a belligerent on the Eastern Front or the Asian-Pacific theater?
If I get to pick sides American in the Asian-Pacific. Hopefully I'll just sit around in a ship the entire time.
>>2543923
Eastern Front.
Asian-Pacific theater seemed like it was shit for everyone. There was an island where there was basically not enough place to shit so the whole island became saturated with burger and nip shit, mixing in with the sun warmed corpses.
Would appreciate a link to the wiki article to that specific island btw.
Asia Pacific, but only as a Navyman.
I hate the cold.
but the citizens for allowing it to happen.
damn......... really made me think
Stop blaming the victim. Should women automatically know better than to be seduced by predators?
Shit, decent thought OP. Great Man Theory is not true, why not the reverse? Not saying leaders shouldn't be held accountable for their actions but can all these people really just say they were doing their job?
>But don't hate her when she gets up to leave
Good reference but guaranteed to be a shit meme thread
>>2543972
>neutral meme hotel
>a good reference
God what nice fucking borders. I'm sure it something to do with spending so much time on a Nazi Panzer training forum but pre WW1 Germany just looks amazing on a map.
>Dat Bavaria
>Dem Prussian tendrils
>That THICC Rhineland
What would Jesus do?
>>2543815
Levitate the tram away
Same thing god does. Just wait and watch
get crucified
What happened to all the people, especially the good ones, who lived and died before Christianity was around?
>>2543607
There are no such things as "good people" according to Christianity. ALL have fallen short of the glory of God, so ALL are sinners and equally worthless.
>>2543634
t. John Calvin
Let me help from a purely theological sense.
<SPOILER WARNINGS>
Jews have a direct lineage back to Noah. They are God's chosen people and had a covenant with God. Then the Romans came to test the Jews and they failed the test. No one was righteous among them.
So God sent his Son to take away the sins of the world. This creates the new covenant with humanity. Through following the teachings of Jesus any man or woman can be one of the Chosen people with a covenant from God.
Then, as the Christians became less righteous and more sinful God sent Mohammad apparently to really being the point home.
Heaven is only for God's chosen people, who live righteous lives in accordance with His will.
What if Rommel instead of investing Tobruk had pushed the Afrika Korps east after the retreating British and left primarily the Italians to just invest and pin the defenders in Tobruk?
Would they have been able to seize Egypt this way? As the british wouldn't have had the time to build the El-Alamein position.
>>2543580
>What if Rommel instead of investing Tobruk had pushed the Afrika Korps east after the retreating British and left primarily the Italians to just invest and pin the defenders in Tobruk?
No. For starters, you can't fully enclose Tobruk (they never fully enclosed Tobruk even with the Germans along), and letting the Italians alone just means that the Brits are almost certain to slip out and raid, if they don't break out in force. Secondly, there were British forces east of the city, which is what things like Battleaxe were all about. You kind of have to get past them somehow.
>Would they have been able to seize Egypt this way? As the british wouldn't have had the time to build the El-Alamein position.
No. For starters, your qualification doesn't even make sense. El Alamein was in late '42, during Rommel's second offensive, the one where he actually did take Tobruk; the one where it was invested was in '41.
Secondly, the logistical issues that plagued Rommel also hurt the British, although not quite as badly as they had better sealift and harbor capabilities. They were never able to project their entire force into Libya, and always had guys milling around in Egypt because they just didn't have the capability to move the supplies up out of the places with rail connections to the middle of the desert. Even at El-Alamein, only about 2/3 of the Mid-East command was actually fighting, the rest were backed up further behind for lack of transport and supply.
If you ignore the Tobruk defenses, and bypass the forces east of the city through magic, you will STILL run into defenders. The entire plan is nonsense.
>>2543580
Because Italians can't into war.
They
can
not
do
war.
>>2543627
I can understand what you say, but the main focus of what i said is that without the Italians (laying seige of Tobruk) that Rommel can dictate policy without worrying about the consequences of having the Italians in the mix, and also a pure German force although smaller can be moved and directed better, then all that fuel that the Italians would not need would be brought forward to supply the Germans, giving the Germans more fuel.
Also the German Luftwaffe would be in a better position as well, as the Italians realistically need no air cover, the RA could be sent to bolster the Luftwaffe, giving the Axis several hundred more planes to face the RAF.
Are there any eye witness accounts of Hitler shitting himself? He was known to suffer from IBS and had uncontrollable bowel movements.
leftypol u so funneh
DAE lettuce dog?
Why aren't Hitler threads getting replies?
I'm writing a Political Philosophy paper and I don't speak to any of the folk in the seminar so I need to have a discussion somewhere. Any input and discussion would be much appreciated.
Either I answer the question on Marx critique of Capitalism or one on Liberty. The Marx question seems a little dull and there is already boundless material evaluating it already. I'm more interested in the question on Liberty therefore I would like to gauge some different responses/viewpoints. Lets try and keep memeing and shit flinging to a minimum.
So, what is the greatest threat to Liberty in the United Kingdom today? I am planning to argue that the greatest threat to liberty in the UK is the culture of 'political correctness' which shuts down logical debate concerning serious issues (immigration, islamisation of societies, leaving the EU) and how the cult of social media attempts to stop people from speaking about un-popular beliefs and opinions. Effectively shutting down free speech through attempts of character assassination (labelling someone homophobic/xenophobic/racist/white-supremacist). I'm curious as to how popular my answer will be with the person grading however I feel it should not matter as they are always bitching about how 99% of the papers they receive argue the same point.
TLDR; Discussion - What is the GREATEST threat to Liberty in the United Kingdom today?
The EU
>monarchist country
>liberty
Kek
e
k
>>2543284
Why is that friend ? I mean in what way does the EU directly threaten our liberty ? Are you referring to how we have no input to laws they can pass and how they dictate immigrant intake ?
Why did Skorzeny do it?
Was it life insurance against his own assassination? Was it an internalized sense of guilt? Was it just for the lulz?
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.711115
>>2543163
The Lulz. You have to understand Skorzeny fucking loved his work. If someone wanted to give him another job, he was going to take it regardless of who the paymaster was.
>>2543833
So he basically turned his back on the very ideology he swore his life to for amusement?
>>2545405
Yeah, he's basically /pol/. /pol/ used to hate Jews, now they love them, because Trump is more amusing than neo-nazism.
Let's be honest lads, was belgium really worth it?
>>2543060
Why is Germany spilling his sausages? Belgium isn't a hot chick, he looks like a 10 year old boy. Is this comic trying to say that Germany is a nation of pedos?
More like lelgium lmao
>>2543060
It really wasn't. Why would the UK want to have been brought a war for a country with an identity problem
Why did Mussolini declare war on the second coming of Jesus Christ?
>>2542741
He did what?
>>2542741
Because he wanted to be like the Roman Empire.
>>2542752
When was Ethiopia ever part of the Roman Empire?
Anyone else notice this? Young Christian guys in their teens and college years tend to enjoy "acting gay" for a laugh. Some of them do this constantly and you almost couldn't go to a youth or college group event, be it Catholic or Evangelical without some of the guys being all over each other to incite a laugh or to make others uncomfortable.
The most common things I would see is things like spooning, guys sitting on each others laps, or sitting with their arms around each other for long periods of time. I did see it go as far as two guys sucking each others' thumbs, holding hands, showering together in the same stall at camp, and a couple of years ago at a "community group" superbowl party, two shirtless guys sat in a two-person bean bag chair with their arms around each other's shoulders. It was really hotter than any soft-core gay porn I had ever seen.
Interesting thing is most of these guys were probably not gay. Pretty much all of them that participated in these kind of activities had girlfriends or courtships and are now married. I suspect some of it has its roots in the sexual repression that comes from purity culture. You see similar "bending" of etiquette in other all-male environments like prisons and the military. You don't see most men acting like this in "the world" if they are not gay. In fact, I've been to gay bars and haven't seen as much homoeroticism as I've seen at some youth/college church events.
Ironic thing is as soon as a guy confesses to struggling with same-sex attraction within their youth/college group, it's not uncommon to be ostracized by the same group.
Anyway my point is does anyone else notice this or am I overthinking things? What are your thoughts on this fenomena?
>>2542638
I have no clue what you're talking about and think you're just pulling shit out of your ass
>>2542664
Have you ever interacted with non imageboard Christian 16-24 males?
>>2542638
Modern society has brainwashed you into thinking being close with a guy friend is gay. Read more shit from before the 20th century.
>/his/ will never be a pure History board
>/his/ will forever be cursed with with Humanities faggots who fill up this board with religious and atheism bullshit
Why?
>>2542577
Honestly I feel like everyone who brings up religion irrelevantly in threads are just shitposters, there are plenty of threads oriented specifically towards religion that are actually okay and insightful [spoiler]but more often than not shit[/spoiler]
>>2542577
Read the title retard:
History & Humanities. If it makes you feel better maybe they could change it to /hum/
there has to be a balance between religious edgelords and armor autists