Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1455. page

File: 6578987965786909.jpg (4MB, 4128x3096px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4128x3096px

>>2547940

>>2547901
>Which one
Christians

"Jews" aren't even Semites They didn't come from Shem.

>>2547922
They speak a Semitic language.

*of this

>>2547849
FDR is the good, Stalin the bad and Churchill the Ugly. /thread

Ugly is definitely Churchill.
He looks like frog.

>>2547643
lolno

>>2547643
No, but your cranium is compatible with a bullet. Kys.

>>2547643
No, he valued individualism. Marxism is fundamentally collectivist in practice.

>>2547480
Who knows. What it was at Fatima?

>>2547540
You fucking retarded subhuman, it was at JERUSALEM when it got razed to the ground

>>2547548
So, I am subhuman holding a degree in classical history who came across Flavius on numerous occasions and you're not a piece of shit for not properly reading my post? Be glad I even responded to this display of extreme retardation on your part.

>the british cabinet waited 3 days to talk about it because it was the weekend.

LOL, jesus christ.

>>2547331
A lot of reasons
1) The French greatly over-estimated how many troops the Germans had and how effective these troops would be, they took all of the paramilitaries in the region, over-estimated those numbers, and counted them as regular soldiers. They decided with that that they would have to fully mobilize to invade.
2) Fully mobilizing costs a lot of money, and France was nearly broke in 1936.
3) Maybe they could send in a smaller force, but the problem with the French military was that any forces sent would mean 3 divisions that couldn't be raised, as every active division would convert into 4 divisions in war-time.
4) The French strategy was a defensive one, and they didn't plan to be launching offensives instantly at the start of the war, as they considered their 1 year conscripts unsuitable for such operations. Hence, the Germans remilitarizing it was not that important to the French strategy.
5) The French air force was already starting to lag behind the German one.
6) France could gain diplomatic advantage from this and tie Britain closer to her, meaning that a future war would have the British on their side.
7) Not many people wanted to go to war again.

File: IMG_3865.jpg (79KB, 554x921px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 554x921px

>set in Revolutionary France
>English accents

> he only watches Mel Gibson´s Passion of the Christ

>>2547305
>set in Ancient Egypt
>english with british accent

>>2547104

Ona popa many a popa.

File: jesus.jpg (385KB, 1100x2127px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1100x2127px

>>2547104
they came out of two different cultural contexts.

Catholics = Western Europe
Orthodox = Eastern/Byzantine/Greek Europe

>>2547112
Wud the fugg

>>2547129
I have read about Stoic philosophy, and the Orthodox believe that Apatheia is the ideal state of prayer iirc.
Is this an example of that?

>>2547042
He had no use for anarchism or anarchists.

>>2547042
Like every person with a brain he realized Anarchism was cancer because without the state to control the man, the man destroys itself

He said the meaning of human life is to pursue self-discipline and art, in a state of war we can't have poetry, music, dance or art/culture in general

He figured anarchists were primarily motivated by resentment of power and success, and thus viewed them with contempt.

His ideals, however wound up being quite influential in anarchist thought (particularly individualist anarchism and post-anarchism) and it's really not hard to see why; his notion of the best ruling is ultimately not dissimilar to the anarchist notions of emergent leadership, and a society where everyone took his ideals to heart would ultimately become rather anarchistic in function (you can't refuse to follow the heard and then subvert yourself to the wishes of society).

>>2547084
His reservations about anarchism had very little to do with the feasibility of the system.

>>2546988
Because even if the emperor could only rely on a quarter of those petty, infighting states, he'd have a big fucking army. It was also densely populated and developed, and combined with the disunity meant the entire empire was heavily fortified and well equipped with lots of manpower to go around.

>>2547020
I guess that makes sense, also speaking of the Emperor what did he even do? I mean all the states in the empire practically functioned like they were independent and even in religious matters the HRE seemed to have relied more so on the will of the Pope and thus the Papal States as opposed to the Emperor.

The HRE is the poster child for being a decentralized petty state with massive infighting, most other feudal states for most history were no better. The Kings of France often contended with powerful nobles such as the Duke of Aquataine, and the English Crown had manage the nation with a Parliament, which not only forced the King to heed the will of the nobles but even that of the burghers.

Notice how during the Medieval period in that .gif the Empire not only managed to survive, but even expand in many areas, but once Centralization began to take root in other European nations, they began losing land and power.

File: IMG_0621.png (275KB, 501x550px) Image search: [Google]

275KB, 501x550px

>>2546979
>I'm a catholic atheist btw.

some russian movies, Viking is the one I can remember now

>>2546979
>I'm a catholic atheist btw

explain

1. Germanics and Spaniards chimped out and drove them East
2. Multiple Polish rulers passed edicts guaranteeing the safety of Jews and non-Catholic Christians. Later rulers also granted them commercial privileges.

>>2546948
Jews were accepted in Poland, anti semitic stereotype was started by communist government ironically.

>>2547014
nah, nationalist Poland pre-WWII was very anti-semetic and passsed descriminatory laws against Jews. the Polish underground would refuse and kill Jews who tried to join, though they would cooperate with the Jewish underground in the Warsaw ghetto from time to time to sell weapons

>>2546863
Unsustainable war-wise? Or unsustainable peacetime-wise?

>>2546869
Peacetime is what I'm more interested in. I know it lacked sustainability warwise.

Hitler's economic policy was basically 'dude just privatize everything lmao'

he basically invented neoliberalism

No, Greeks did.

>Uwaaaaaaah, Aphrodite-san, I didn't see anything!
>TEIRESIAS NO BAKA

File: 1489086904204.png (535KB, 432x611px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 432x611px

was animu the reason Rome fell?

>>2546926
It is actually kind of interesting, Roman sculpture tends to be a lot more stylised towards the end of the western Empire (though their painting remained the same), some people think this is because Constantine wanted a recognisable style of art that people would know designated work to his reign, and it sort of became a fad because it was quite different.

Cultural and in some cases religious reasons. I think in japan its mostly because of culture, you were expected to do art in certain ways depending on time. In middle east painting humans was apparently a big nono because of some islam related reason.

Because the Japs never learned about the renaissance.

File: IMG_8031.jpg (450KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1920x1080px

>>2546838
Shitty bait

Japanese art thread?
Japanese art thread.