Why are we sexually attracted to incest as a fetish when it leads to retarded shit like this?
I guess people like plenty of stuff that's ultimately pretty bad for us
Plus there's a difference between thinking something is titillating and actually wanting to do it
That's not just incest, that's generations and generations of inbreeding, with some shitty starting genes to begin with. If you just impregnate your sister or mother and aren't inbred yourself, the kid will most likely be fine, with only slightly higher risk of issues than normal.
Also people with an incest fetish usually just like it as an abstract idea, they're not attracted to their actual relatives.
>>2540750
"we"
who's this "we"? incest is fucking disgusting
ITT: Final boss tier people
Ever since Jackie Chan buddied up with the CCP, whoever tries to take them down will have a kung fu boss fight on their hands.
Time for a history meme thread.
>>2536774
how did we get to 3095 with only 9 more world wars?
>>2536777
.75 world wars per century on average.
Did the Titanic have a flawed desing?
If he built it perfectly, why did it sink when it hit an iceberg?
>>2536731
ICE CAN'T BREAK STEAL HULLS
>>2536731
Not especially so. Several factors contributed to making the sinking a disaster.
Had the Titanic gone into the iceberg head on then she probably wouldn't have sunk. The flaw on that night was trying to take evasive manoeuvres, which meant the iceberg tore into the side of the ship, penetrating multiple sections at once. The ships bulkheads were not sealed all the way to the top, as the architects of the ship didn't envisage so many compartments flooding at once.
The reason it became such a costly tragedy in terms of lives was lack of lifeboats, confusion as to how best to evacuate the ship, confusion leading to multiple lifeboats being half empty, and multiple distress calls to nearby ships being mistaken or ignored.
The Titanic was probably much safer than many of the ships going across the North Atlantic on any given day. A combination of factors forced a disaster that night.
>Anarcho-Capitalism has never been tri-
>>2536375
Kowloon Walled City can also be said to have been anarcho-capitalist
Who /takeda/ here?
>>2536397
Takeda a shit
We /oda/ now
Come in here to discuss all things Mesopotamian.
What was your favourite period from there? I'm very intrigued by the biblical and historical accounts of Neo-Babylonia.
Does anyone else get kind of a strange ominous feeling when reading about ancient Mesopotamian civilizations pre 700 BC? Ancient Egypt doesn't freak me out, but something about Sumeria, the Hittites and others really unnerves me.
Did Sumeria develop the world's first military?
>>2536434
Like what? Can you give an example?
What's the funniest moment in history?
ur life
That one French revolutionary who kept pissing himself right before he was to be guillotined, but the reactionary executioner would stop the blade inches above his neck so he could repeat the process over and over again
>>2523649
The Hundred Years War
Thought I'd make a new thread dedicated to making and sharing charts. It can also double as a book discussion thread. Unfortunately I'm back in school so I don't think I'll be making so many this week. But I encourage other anons to pick up the slack. If /lit/ and other boards can make their own content to share, we should be able to as well desu. Don't be afraid to discuss and share your thoughts about books you're reading or have read.
If you want to try you're hand at making charts on a particular theme or time period, but don't know what books to use, I recommend taking a look at my pastebin filled with tons of oxford bibliographies:
http://pastebin.com/u/jonstond2
It's tedious work combing through these and find the works you want, but maybe try to narrow your focus so small time periods, particular historical events (e.g. russian revolution, thirty years' war) or narrow themes (e.g. medieval peasant clothing or some random thing like that)
Some recommended topics to look into:
Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth, Prussia, Scandinavia, Vikings, Anglo-Saxon England, Medieval and Dark Age Ireland, French Revolution, American Revolution, Civil War, the Crusades
>>2512883
Even easier, I've already found a lot of works on particular subjects but I'm too busy to organize what I have and cut down material to a level acceptable to fit on a chart. You can to make charts on this stuff before I eventually get to it! Also don't hesitate to make charts from some of these lists:
Ottonians, Salians and Hohenstaufens: http://pastebin.com/3YKXqsqp
Medieval Poland: http://pastebin.com/Sup8mzgW
China: http://pastebin.com/GuATVPtM
Ireland: http://pastebin.com/GhXx5jyw
Scotland: http://pastebin.com/nfgxA8rr
Valois and Habsburg Burgundy/ the Medieval Low Countries (~1300-1550): http://pastebin.com/mAwavvZf
Celts/Romanization of the Celts: http://pastebin.com/NQm9DpPU
Ancient Nubia/Axum/Libya/Sahara: http://pastebin.com/sxW0tmT5
Czechs/Bohemia and Moravia: http://pastebin.com/Fw6QZyLe
Hungarian History: http://pastebin.com/guPsv4cK
Victorians (Mostly stuff on technology, industrialisation, literary reactions, working/middle/upper class history): http://pastebin.com/NEkhdCeR
switzerland: http://pastebin.com/xFsDqcd9
>>2512890
Here is a bibliography with an exhaustive list on primary and secondary sources on the vikings
https://www.asnc.cam.ac.uk/resources/research/gts2-VikBibl2004.pdf
a lot of books on european history can be found in these reading lists as well
http://www.hist.cam.ac.uk/undergraduate/tripos-papers/part-i-papers-2016-2017
>>2512977
>the greatest "French" leader of the past was Germanic
>the greatest "French" leader of the present was Italic
What did they mean by this?
>>2552443
Curie,Da vinci, Chopin..
French are just the best because they steal the best from other nation.
you already made this thread and you got btfo
>>>/int/
>>2552465
Or maybe they're cuckolds who like to be ruled by other people. Celts are a culture of cucks.
What do you think about laïcité? Is this the right way to handle religion?
It would be. The next step in the handling of religion is to abolish it as a legal cathegory. If yook at it from a truly secular perspective, it's just a bunch of separable thoughts and customs. Distinguishing it from everything else gives it a sort of legitimacy and does not do anything but allow for several breaches on a country's conventional law system because of muh freedom of religion. This way it could work as any other sector of society/economy. Religious institutions would survive as long as the people who want them have the funds to keep it running, just like every service. Or they could be built as state-owned infrastructural facilities if there's a population that absolutely demands it.
>>2550357
only republicans care about laicity and they get butthurt as soon as their little republics lose control over the population or are recalled that their republicanism is a religion too.
>>2550357
>laïcité
What is it?
>murdered 225,000 Japanese people instantly just to show off new superweapon to the rest of the world
>proceed to spend 20 years losing the Vietnam War and never nuking them, completely destroying our image as a powerful nation
What was the point?
>completely destroying our image as a powerful nation
well if anyone wants smoke we can drop another nuke
>>2548051
Didn't Vietnam prove we're never going to use nuclear weapons again?
>>2548056
why do you say that?
Bogpill me on pre-division Korea.
>>2547949
North Korea was always impious, the south less so
I mean they were occupied by the japs for like 50 or so years pre-division
>>2547949
A made up country and ethnicity.
What is true capitalism?
>>2547053
Well unlike state socialism it doesn't conflate an economic system with a system of government like some image macros do.
If you want a real answer its an abstraction based around some tried and true principles of economics. There are less pure forms of it but there is no pure form
>>2547053
Leopold was a good, charitable man though.
It was all the admins who fucked shit up and he got the blame.
>>2547053
Except capitalism at least has examples of success, unlike Communism
Sweden has an amazing history
First swedish empire
Second swedish empire
Third swedish empire
Where does this gentleman rank among all the worlds generals? I'd put him in the top 20. Top 5 for American generals, probably right behind Patton and Stonewall
>>2546221
>I'd put him in the top 20
Why? He was a decent cavalry commander, and that's about it.
>Top 5 for American generals, probably right behind Patton and Stonewall
Patton was a terrible commander. Jackson was a legitimately good general, but even he has his work cut out for him to be a top 5 when you have guys like Devers and King and Scott and Lee in the running.
It's hilariously cringey you apparently think there are at least 5 Americans along the top 20 generals of all time.
And no way is he in the top 5 Americans, either.
>>2546221
Forrest was an incredibly unremarkable officer in the grand scheme of military history. I'm not even sure he'd make my top 5 list for the American Civil War. He was competent at harassment and raiding supply lines, but that's about it.
You probably rank Rommel pretty high, I'd wager.
>>2546302
>It's hilariously cringey you apparently think there are at least 5 Americans along the top 20 generals of all time.
While I agree with this statement, I think you need to work on your reading comprehension.