The Ariane V ECA will launch from French Guiana to deliver the Star One D1 and JCSAT-15 communications satellites into geostationary orbit.
Watch live here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqwh4oV2J-E
Here is the French stream https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayhKaZSI8r4
It's not gonna blow up who cares?
T-00:14
Broadcast now live
Anyone good with metals?
Here's the problem to solve, suppose you wanted to separate pennies into two piles, bronze pennies and copper-plated pennies
But we are talking several thousand.
Visual inspection works and you can verify by checking the date (post 1982 = copper-plated zinc).
Assume that if you pour them out, you could successfully extract ~80% of all post-1982 by visual color difference of the metals. What would be the best method for checking the remaining mixture of pennies?
My initial thought are that they have different reflective properties, so that you could tune a light to quickly shine out the remainders. Anyone have a better idea?
Do some redox chemistry using another reference metal. You should be able to tell if it's oxidizing or reducing based on which metal is plated onto/off of the penny
Clean them all well and measure their resistance. Bronze has a conductivity about twice that of copper and zinc.
>>8554450
Using an induced magnetic field you can make the high conductivity copper coins "jump" further away than the bronze coins. Coin op machines use many ways to check for legit coins, including conductivity.
I have right here scientific proof of aliens.
>Greifswald Lights - August 24, 1990 Germany
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzDXwZ2ZoDE
Whats great about this case is it happened to be filmed by three sets of people spread along the coast enabling triangulation. This gave an exact location of the UFO. Pic related. Since the distance was known and the brightness estimated from the films there is even an estimate of the power output of the thing, 0.25 - 4.5 MW. Coupled with the fact that it hovered motionless for hours this kills of the only skeptic argument of flares. Furthermore no military in the area ever admitted to dropping flares in the area. Conclusion: A contingent of Greys sent to oversee German reunification in 1990 (make sure nukes don't start flying).
>>8554238
>enabling triangulation
How was this done?
>Since the distance was known
Was it? I mean how did they get the hight?
>>8554238
>scientific proof of aliens
The concept of 'proof' is alien to science, it only applies to axiom-based reasoning.
The mufon cms is full of such observations and the nature of these orbs is still unknown.
>>8554238
No you don't You have an ASSUMPTION that is 'Alien'
Is is NOT Alien.
I can't even bother watching all of it. However, I'll give you a hint:
In the 1930- 40s the Germans were working (among many secret super-tech projects) on anti-gravity devices - as fighters/ bombers and / or other weapons.
In 1945 the scientists, researchers, notes, hardware, working & non-working models were 'secretly' (been de-classified now) taken by US and Russian army/ secret mission people (1 pretext was 'saving the worlds ART treasures stolen by Nazis'). The US version was called 'Operation Paperclip'.
Not all of this has been declassified, however, and the study & work on some of these projects continues to this day.
The US govt found - after the Russian spies stole plans for 'The Bomb' from us - That the only way to keep a secret was Dis-Information.
What better story that to blame these weird unexplainable appearances on space men from 'other worlds' - Aliens. Hollywood played a HUGE part by making all those movies about Aliens, prob got the Idea from 'War of the Worlds' ... and other early fiction writers?
Remember -- Jet fighters were pretty amazing - even incredible, in the 1940s when ALL airplanes were powered by piston & propeller! !!
Who was the hack or fraud? Who was the misunderstood genius?
>>8553981
The real genius is the brain behind that car company's marketing strategy.
>>8553981
>Who was the hack or fraud? Who was the misunderstood genius?
Tesla and Edison, respectively
>this kills the >>>/x/tard
>>8553981
The real question is... who is smart enough to make money on it these days?
Is Introduction to Statistics hard? Would it be harder than College Algebra?
Can somebody list all of the things I will study in Intro Stats, P L E A S E?
>>8553497
literally piss easy just do the homework and be ready for tests
what is college algebra?
>>8553497
>Can somebody list all of the things I will study in Intro Stats, P L E A S E?
They have things for that already pre-made. I think they call em textboots or testbooks, somethint like that.
Goodbye dark matter and warp drives?
https://futurism.com/a-new-theory-of-gravity-just-passed-its-first-test-heres-what-this-means-for-physics/
>>8553399
rly mayekz me tinc
http://motls.blogspot.ca/2016/11/verlindes-de-sitter-mond-is-highly.html
> Verlinde's de Sitter MOND is highly incomplete, to say the least
>The Dutch media brutally overhype a generic speculative idea
>I wouldn't okay this wrong piece of work as an undergraduate term paper but he got 6.5 millions of euros for this absolutely worthless pile of feces so many people who are impressed by the money but don't have an idea about science – which includes virtually all journalists – started to think that Verlinde is a top physicist. And he may have decided that he must justify the award by producing even greater piles of bogus hype.
>Someone else may find some crisp ideas that make the same or similar picture convincing – e.g. derive the volume-extensive entanglement entropy terms in de Sitter space from string theory etc. But without such an advance, I think that Erik Verlinde's preprint is a mediocre vague paper that everyone may ignore and it's too bad that the science media act differently. By the way, if you care, Frank Wilczek has attended a talk by Erik Verlinde and his words were harsher than mine.
>>8553581
I almost posted that Motls piece.
I'm waiting for his response now that the theory has been 'tested' - which appears to be a more recent claim.
Sadly, I don't have the knowledge to give an independent assessment.
I just had an idea for a more efficient way to generate electricity and I wanted to run it by a few more people to gauge its viability.
The basic concept is a solar thermal system that concentrates heat to convert algae into biofuel. During the day the heated water would create steam to run a tesla turbine and at night the collected biofuel would keep the generator running. The CO2 generated by the biofuel burn at night would be collected and reintegrated into the algae tanks to promote algae growth.
The solar thermal system would consist of a concave mirror which follows the sun during the course of the day. Running across the mirror is a pipe through which the algae rich water runs through. This pipe would be heated to 500 degree celsius and the algea rich water would take about a minute to run through the pipe. Steam would be siphoned off to the turbine, which would generate electricity during the day. After the steam runs through the system it is collected in a separate tank until it cools and condenses back into a liquid form, which is then fed back into the algae tanks.
The resultant biofuel from the reaction would be collected and stored in a separate tank. As night falls, and the pipe cools to below 500c, the system would switch over to a combustion engine that runs on the biofuel. The engine would continue to run the turbine and generate electricity during the night.
The algae would be stored in two or more tanks, which alternate per day giving the algae a chance to grow. The CO2 generated by the combustion engine is collected and reinfused into the algae tanks. The tanks themselves are closed systems, keeping the CO2 from escaping into the atmosphere.
Initially, I am thinking of small scale generators able to generate around 20kWh per day, with any excess power stored in batteries.
The only inputs this system needs is a little bit of water and nutrients for the algae.
Question is how viable is this idea? Are there any glaring flaws in my concept?
>>8553084
Well, glue is science, but so is tape.
>>8553084
>The only inputs this system needs is a little bit of water and nutrients for the algae.
Account for the efficiency of feeding it nutrients.
Algae are photosynthetic
Algae would probably die at 500C
Since you're doing so well heating water to 500C with the sun alone why do you need a wasteful algae process running alongside?
Reinjected CO2 becomes carbonic acid.
Plus, introduced CO2 I'm pretty sure is adsorbed. You can't force feed CO2 to anything AFAIK so there will be a limit, after which you are just venting CO2 to the atmosphere (and we will tax it)
Describe your operation for the removal and disposal of vast amounts of dead algae sludge
>>8553087
It's not glue, it's physics.
I was thinking some more about my generator and realised that not all algae will turn into biofuel, so there needs to be a third tank that takes the water with algae that didn't complete the chemical reaction in the pipe.
Ideally I would like to build the reactive parts of generator with titanium (pipe and turbine), though I don't know how cost effective that would be. I can imagine with the algae and water and constant heating there will be significant chance of corrosion and damage.
Reminder that if you are a physics major at a uni without a subatomic physics laboratoy you should give up
>>8553072
Hey fellow UBC bro
>>8553083
sup
>>8553093
You done finals? Year/program?
I want to study Mathematics and Biology at home (among other subjects), but I don't know how to learn by myself. You see, my mother is a musician and my father a writer, so they both pulled me out of school in 4th grade and enlisted me in a Literature and Humanities school (yes, those exist). So, I don't know anything about Mathematics beyond the extremely basic shit such as multiplication and division, and nothing at all about Biology, Physics, Chemistry and so on. Being an ungrateful cunt of a son, I resented their decision of depriving me of my right to choose my own future and now, with a useless English major at hand, I want to go back and learn everything that every other person in the world had the chance to learn. Thing is, I can't go to college again since obviously I wouldn't understand anything they teach; most of the stuff online is either extremely basic or extremely advanced, the middle stuff isn't there; and going to school with a bunch of kids is just degrading when you yourself could be a teacher if you wanted to.
So, again, my question is, how do you learn on your own?
Thanks for reading my blog.
Have you checked the Sticky?
It gives books of all levels that advance upwards.
https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Recommended_material
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Obtaining_textbooks
>>8552538
Get a book. Turn off computer, open book. EZPZ
>>8552538
I would seriously recommend just dedicating a week to go through the arithmetic through pre-algebra topics on khan academy and see where you're lacking
Or do the "world of math" mission which starts at retarded level and quickly moves up, then just use the videos and practice exercises to brush up on stuff that you're a little lost on. It's a really efficient way to rapidly get through what you already know (easy stuff), find the stuff that confuses you (the middle stuff you want to know), and bypass the hard stuff until later.
Also, in conjunction with that, Everyday Math Demystified and Algebra Know-it-all by Stan Gibilisco (which you can probably find for free online somewhere) are both great self-teaching references for people who are motivated but math-illiterate. They contain a huge swath of information that is extremely useful to know which is taught rapidly and explained well.
Who wants to discuss the book that ended the Scientific "Method"?
>>8552535
>implying any working scientists gives a shit and would stop doing science to even think about that "philosophy"
>>8552537
>hur dur let's just not question our methods bro, lets just do what we want haha
>"Well, Jim, we have x amount of dollars, which departments should we be investing in?"
>"Well, Tom, let's invest into alchemy and astrology."
>"But, Jim, their methods aren't valid"
>"Let us not question our method, Tom. Let's just spend the money."
*Two years later, the USA Department of Science is bankrupt and whose lack of technological advancement leads to the Russian Annex of Texas and ultimately, the takeover of the USA.*
The point I made above is antithetical to the book in the OP but it serves to illustrate how RETARDED you are. Thanks!
>>8552535
I would like to, but I haven't read it yet. Reading Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" atm
>search up dinosaur news
>"how birds evolved from dinosaurs"
>-4 hours ago-
how are people still not getting this.
>>8552218
>That tail
>in any discussion where there's some guy that denies science
>"yeah well, science is faith-based too, you just accept what your holy books say as well"
I'm so fucking mad, I actually want to hurt these people.
>>8552218
>search up
fgt pls
Explain
>>8552013
Looks like a vanilla spiral. Most ammonite spirals are not actually fibonnaci.
>>8552021
>ammonite
(Nautilus too, sage)
Jesus likes spirals
Hello /sci! I was wondering if theres a relation that
n and c affect d's length. If so what is it called? Sorry if its obvious stuff. I'm just a shitty high schooler
Try drawing a line from the intersection of d and c going straight down perpendicular to b. That should get you started.
if it is of any help, ( I promise I'll learn LaTex):
d = [ Area/c*sin(n) ] + [ c*cos(n)/2)
Area is the area of the trapezoid
d = [ P - c*( 1 + sin(n) + cos(n) ) ] /2
P is the perimeter of the trapezoid
>>8552008
Yes, take Calc I dummy.
It's a related rates problem.
Any meds students here? I bought this, why did the manual say I can wear it for only 3 hours a day? During those 3 hours I'm straight as an arrow but as soon as I take it off I'm back to being Quasimodo. Well not instantly but in like 30 minutes. I've had this shit and went by the manual for a month. Can I just wear it for 8 hours instead?
>>8551952
If you want good posture you should probably consider working out to complement that thing, whatever it is.
t. not a med student
>>8551958
How does /sci/ keep their posture decent? I can't study without slouching over the book in a comfortable position, and it doesn't help that I spend a lot of time on the computer as well. How often do you work out and is it intensive?
>>8551966
Get a better chair
Is "brain overload" a thing? Like, you spend so much time switching between tabs on addicting websites, or you read too much shit simultaneously, or engage in any sort of compulsive behavior for so long that your brain gets exhausted and you can't do anything at all for a while?
>>8551900
Yes, for me at least. If I study rigorously throughout the day and constantly think of concepts for a website or a new video game, my brain goes blank and it is impossible for me to think of anything until after a few minutes of relaxing.
>>8551900
Yeah, definitely a thing. =^)
you're just depressed and it makes things like actually doing work harder because you can't tolerate discomfort well and you keep drifting off to more pleasant things as a result