Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1058. page

analysis

>>8555869
category theory

>>8555874
I hope your kidding. Analysis is the redpill on why all the other math you do works

>>8554945
>I failed algebra seven times
People who are incapable of learning material after seven attempts don't deserve to graduate.

WHERE AM I SUPPOSED TO BUY THE TIME TO LEARN ALL KNOWLEDGE

ANSWER ME NOW

>>8554945
>Why is this allowed to happen?

Mathematics at the high school and early college level is, in my opinion, a purity test.

What are they testing for? They are looking for the percentage of non-retardation in your brain.

Look, I study mathematics at my university and contrary to that author my "shitty requisites that want to prevent me from furthering my studies!" are the humanities. I have always been shit at writing classes in high school. I was a mediocre student at anything that was not math and yet I have passed every class of that manner with a B.

But you cannot do the contrary. You cannot pass a basic algebra class, like I passed a basic writing class in uni. Why is that? Because mathematics is the only topic you cannot cheat.

In my writing classes I simply tried to memorize some nice words and patterns and then pretty much faked that I was a "well-read writer" in the final and got myself a nice B. Writing like I never had before.

You can't do that for mathematics, for some reason. You have to earnestly be smart and responsible but you aren't. You aren't smart nor responsible and that is why you fail mathematics.

Go cry those brainlet tears somewhere else.

>>8551660
Reposting my q

Seroius question: what is the average diameter of the human penis when erect

>>8551685
Integral of the diameter over the length of the penis, divided by the length of the penis.

>>8550805
yes it will fly

the treadmill literally can't do shit to stop the plane, the plane's wheels are frictionless thus the tread mill no matter how fast it spins cannot stop the forward thrust of the plane's turbines

>>8550823
But here's the thing, the plane needs the wheels to roll on in order to gain it's velocity but it's always counteracted by the belt

>>8550805
The question is ambiguous, and possibly nonsensical. The question presumes that the running belt is holding the plane stationary, but provides no mechanism for that to actually happen. Probably the safest "realistic" answer is yes, the plane can take off and the belt will simply spin up the wheels, though that breaks the "exactly match the speed of the wheels" part of the question.

OP, you do realize that every response to this thread is just going to be people using some stockfish script they found on the internet right?

With that in mind: D2 to D4. Thank you kindly.

there are websites for that
lichess

>>8559268
why would you do that id get it if u knew me but here what would you gain?
G8 to F9

L..lurking desu

Practical Electronics for Inventors
1st Edition -- 12MB, text book quality, 625 pages
www1.appstate.edu/~curtincm/sculpture/suppliers/gizmos/Practical_Electronics_for_Inventors.pdf

>>8559059
Like you gonna read it.
This is /sci/, not /bookcollectors/.

sorry senpai, I never got this shit either
t. engineer

>>8558624
You're thinking about it the wrong way. Both complexes have Fe in a 2+ oxidation state. Its just that H2O contributes 0 where as CN contributes -1 making the overall configurations 2+ and 4- respectively. You then have to look at the ligand field strength. CN is a very strong ligand meaning these complexes are generally low spin (electrons are paired as much as possible i.e only the t2g orbitals are occupied) where as H20 is a much weaker ligand allowing the complex to be high spin so by Hund's rule you fill all the orbitals sequentially before pairing i.e the eg orbitals are filled before the t2g are doubly filled. Hope this makes some sort of sense!

>>8559198
Remember that having Fe 2+ means there are only 6 d electrons in the complex

A giant ball of Iron? ...black balls?

>>8556433
Just research ur mum.

http://xaonon.dyndns.org/hawking/

>>8553114
Somehow they managed to teach you how to read and write so I would be optimistic

>>8553645
brainlet allert

>>8553114
Literally yes. Issue is it would take tens, hundreds of thousands of years. Maybe millions. It would statistically be more feasible to simply find another already intelligent life form or to create AI.

Depends if his suits are pressurized by air or mechanical means.

Welcome to the Fiefdom of Absurdistan

not really, he's another dumb virtue-signalling cuck who won't work on fixing the aging problem.

What's wrong with radicals?

>>8559065
bitch what

>>8559028
Not as far as I know
T. Almost chemist

>>8558858
it's usually easy to understand from a human perspective

>>8558858
An average has the most meaning over significantly many trials, especially if the results are aggregated over time.
One of the principle results of stochastics is that if you take the sum of results from the same distribution over significantly many times, the sum will be approximated by a normal distribution.

If every day, you have a chance at winning a random amount of money. You take this chance every day for the next couple of years, then the total amount of money you could end up with follows approximately with a normal distribution.
Not only that, but the average amount of that distribution is actually the most probable amount that you end up with as a result.

This does not hold for cases of short term experimentation/trials. In those cases, the distribution is more likely to dominate and make the average value less likely to happen or even less likely to be relevant.

The reason we often compare things on average is because we are usually comparing quantities of the first sort: longstanding aggregate quantities which pull from the same distribution each time they mature.

>>8558858
look at the law of large numbers and the central limit theorem.

as far as "human traits" it depends. eugenics proponents love to talk about "averages" but no one wants to be the guy that gets culled

Prisoner's dilemma / tragedy of the commons

>>8558765
Men are more than happy to settle down with an average women

>>8558796
Both of these things are the opposite of what is being suggested. The answer OP is no, there is no such thing in nature. When you really think about it it makes no sense of all anyways. You will always prefer "better" things but getting "less better" things is a consequence of less energy needed to get it, not preference for that thing. But also this is referring to food, and you are a NEET trying to reference group psychology in some cancer thread on the other side of the universe.

On the other side of the spectrum, what if it's always kind of dull yellow?

The only way to tell is to put that spoon in your mouth.

>>8558691
This

>>8558439
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56bhvW0DCR8

The author basically thinks the black anus is the window to the soul. This paper is peer reviewed and funded so that this woman could watch a few fetish porn videos or black chicks getting anal. Don't over think it.

>there are people who think there is nothing wrong with social science

>>8558439
>What kind of madness is this?

It is called feminism.

Feminists are... weird. I would compare it to a rebel militia who opposed a government but then, to achieve peace, are invited to join the government and are given some sits in parliament to legitimize their new political party.

Imagine that happened... but the rebel militia kept their armed people and kept conducting terrorists attacks, even after being recognized as a fellow political party and given honest political power.

That is what happened. Feminists were always publishing this madness but originally it was just about getting the vote and whatever. Then the governments came and said "Ok, you get to vote and now every right will be given to citizens, not only males."

At that point, feminism should have been banned. Absolutely banned. Because feminism won. In other words, after given them political power, we should have taken their more radical and violent form of power, which is feminist """research""".

But for some reason we didn't ban feminism and now we have feminists on one side with honest political power, as government officials, and on the other side feminists with dishonest political power. Those political activists that claim all men are pigs and for some reason have a large following of other feminists.

Feminism should be banned.

>>8558439
>>8558442
>>8558445
Also, this is the author of that """article""".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAfy8vnbjtM