Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1066. page

Then go on to be a very good CS student...? What exactly is making this purgatorial

>>8551856
I just feel like math is a more worthy pursue, It's universal. It is the patterns of the universe. Computer science is just applied maths, and application is always more trivial than theory.

>>8551864
I'm in the same exact situation as you. Are you sticking with CS?

Gravitation by Kip Thorne and Charles Misner

Actually doesn't G. T'Hooft's website How to be a Theoretical Physicist have an entire reading list

>>8551820
Young, Freedman - University Physics
Taylor - Classical Mechanics
Goldstein - Classical Mechanics

>nurse
>Semi-brainlet
>Braffposting.

>>8552121
Thanks for your input

>>8552176
I don't know why you think i wouldn't expect the same level of quality of work from you that i expect from my other slaves

>>8549349
Jesus dude. It's like you're taking chem 1 and phys 1 all at the same time!!!

File: b675eedd-b8ee-414c-a5a3-265d042dc172.jpg (132KB, 958x960px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 958x960px

>>8549349
Not bad. I'd suggest learning Probability after integration and derivation but that's just me. Good luck OP

So how's senior year of highschool treating you?

>>8549023
My guess is that you're misreading the question somehow because it's not possible to explicitly solve that for x

>>8549028
Why it isn't... please I want to learn, I asked a lot of people before coming here but you are the first who replied that

>>8549028
I have the book in spanish, so I will translate:
Find the first and the second derivative(?) of the function.
Then verify them to be reasonable between their graphics.

dude why do people enjoy things that I don't lmao

> belittling others for their interests.

Maybe he would be a respectable scientist if he didn't pander to reddit normies for his career.

>>8548515
>>8548512
He's not wrong, you know

>>8544310

Not that Tyson is a genius, but are you aware that there are extremely famous mathematicians and scientists who haven't taken IQ tests?

He probably believes IQ tests are racist and they keep the black man down

I'm guessing somewhere in the near 130s. Knows he's above average IQ but doesn't want to take the test but wants to show off his intellect still.
>>8544375
Nah.

>>8554190
Errr actually, I think you'll find that if you follow the scientific method properly then you should revise your theories based on experimental evidence. Yeah, so what if the weight of experimental evidence affirming conservation of momentum is vastly greater than that provided by memedrive, I've become personally wedded to this idea, so it [math] has [/math] to be everyone else that's wrong.

>>8554203
But they're claiming now to have measured 50N/kw.
That is amazing.
How can you still deny that?

>>8554210
Like clockwork. Also source.

[eqn] α=2n [/eqn]

where α is also divisible by 3

>>8552786
Fucking hell [eqn] α=2^n [/eqn]

where where α is also divisible by 3
**********

no because 2*2*2*... can be viewed as a prime factorisation of a and it will never have any 3 in there

File: herodotos_pyramid.jpg (10KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 400x300px

>>8552362
>a+b/a
No, it's (a+b)/a=a/b
For origin ask your local Mason.

>>8552362
it's the continued fraction [1,1,1,1,1,...], so yeah, it's pretty common.

>>8552362
>Why is the golden ratio so universal? It's crazy
it isnt

No magnetic Field -> radiation poisoning for all

>>8551746

Just stay under a ceiling or use a sombrero you fucking ape

If the planet's core is completely cooled, does that mean mining all the way through is possible?

>>8551330
>through the window
why through the window?
>for all the current
why all the current?
didn't they tell you that current follows conductance?

>>8551380
>why through the window?
Because not all rooms have a door outside.

>why all the current?
Because all the current passes through the rail.

>didn't they tell you that current follows conductance?
You're saying the path between the rail and my ground isn't conductive?

Can you experiment?

>>8549585
The heat and solar flares would prove to be quite an issue, also It seems far more practical to build a space station in orbit around a star.

>>8549590
>>8549590
but surely building a ring would just be like building a massive amount of space stations around a star and then connecting them, so it could be done, right?

>>8549592
It would be possible but stupid.

The surface area and manoeuvrability of a giant ring around a star would make it difficult to dodge debris and solar flares (don't think a solar flare would be easy to dodge considering how fast and massive they are but still), its a far more inefficient use of space because the ring shape means there's more surface area too, not to mention it would have to be unnecessarily large, the amount of time and resources required would be preposterous. Unless being a ring actually serves some other purpose it's just a stupid idea.

>atoms
>a few seconds

holy kek

>>8553707
You would be more likely to have very single person on the planet bow down before you, every girl bend over and wiling offer you their bodies, desperately craving to fulfill your every and dirtiest sexual fantasies. The man work tirelessly to erect a statue in your honor on every planet/moon in our solar system, an alien race coming to meet you and declaring you their new ruler because you are so cool. You going on to become elected master of the universe, always winning every slot machine you played, successfully jogging down a busy highway for miles without any accidents occuring, being struck by lightning 10 million times in a row without dying, finding atlantis, receiving 30,000 Nobel prizes, earning the love of your father, leaving 4chan and becoming actually successful with your life, and having your sick magically lengthen 3 inches overnight, than the sun ever blinking out like that.

That being said if it did you would never notice because we are talking unimaginably tiny fractions of a second. Not seconds. I don't even know if our most sensitive sensors could detect a blip that tiny.

That being said again, if it were for say, 3 seconds, it would just be like nightime. Not even the moon would dissappear as while it only reflects the sun's light, it would still have a slight delay in that reflection that it would disaper when the sun reeapeared.

>>8553720
what?

Science Fact: When shitposters die, they go to shitposter hell.

sunday

>>8553627
>>8553629
no