>let camera sit for one or two weeks
>turn it on to take still photos of a product for my online store
>f/16, tripod, same settings as always
>horrible spots everywhere
>put camera in sensor cleaning mode
>remove lens
>visible spots on the sensor, not sure if above or below the low pass filter
>definitely fungus, since I can see the stringy arms and they weren't there a few weeks ago, and I never take the lens off
>there's also some on the viewfinder
Alright, can this be fixed? It's an expensive camera (70D) and I don't want to replace it.
Can it be cleaned with just isoprolyn alcohol and blasting it with UV light?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Ruijorji OVS Image-Specific Properties:
>>2966576
>isoprolyn
I meant isopropyl.
>>2966576
you need to send it to canon, your shits fucked
I can't believe all it takes to ruin a camera are a few slightly more humid than usual days. Fuck this shit. How do fungi even eat a sensor?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Ruijorji OVS Image-Specific Properties:
what 35mm film do you recommend for a grunge tone? obviously some of this can be achieved in post if you get the film digitized, but each brand of film has a different end result texture to it. refer to the attached photo to see the style I'm describing/aiming for. cheers fellas
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 852
>>2966315
Just buy the cheapest shit possible. kodak gold 400 or some cheap fuji colour.
>>2966317
is that just the most efficient way of doing it? or does the cheaper shit get this specific job done better?
>>2966315
No film actually looks like that. That image's grungy look is from fucked up scanning and/or post-processing.
Buy whatever film you want and edit it to your liking.
There is no such thing as "film aesthetic"
I'm not interested in photograph at all, nor do I know much about it. BUT: I need to do a small series of about 5 pictures for a university class. I have access to a DSLR.
Can you recommend me something to photograph/Techniques etc. that are easy, fast and make for nice photos?
>>2964796
Assuming that you're taking Photo classes because you're in some sort of creative field you should just drop out as you have no creative want or need. Therefore making whatever you are majoring in completely pointless.
Stop being an uncreative fuck and learn to conceptualize.
>>2964799
My specialty is drawing and painting. However, I HAVE TO do a class on photo and video. Video was okay, but I absolutely don't give a shit about photo, that's why I thought to ask around here.
>>2964813
I don't understand how you can have a problem with this work if you're in a visual field.
Might as well take the easy grade and shoot homeless people
Do you prefer 35 or 50 mm? I use to shoot the most with a 35 on a crop which was actually more like a 56 mm.
Was I being foolish to buy 4 lenses to go with my new camera? I got a 40mm equivalent pancake, a 50 mm equivalent, a 90 mm equivalent, and a 120 mm equivalent macro
Granted I had a canon nifty fifty and a canon 50 mm 2.5 compact macro for my old canon crop to go with my 35mm and zooms so it isn't like I am great with not buying dumb lenses
It's not like we don't have a thread explicitly for these kinds of questions. Delete your thread, then delete yourself.
>>2962532
>>2964210
Fucking thread is asking if you prefer 35 or 50 mm lenses. It is literally a fucking opinion question about which type of prime is better. Fuck you most have been born after we put no child left behind in schools because you can't read for shit
>>2964215
The gear thread is literally about opinion questions such as which type of prime is better. Fuck you most have been born after we put no child left behind in schools because you can't read for shit.
Also it's a stupid question from a stupid boy. Use the focal length that lets you get the photos you want.
Why is actually nobody discussing (or even mentioning) the sigma cameras here?
sp quattro h
>asp-h
>51mp medium-format tier resolution
>superior non-bayer-array sensor
>4x larger pixels
>more accurate color sampling & sharper
>14bit raw
>2 monitors
>2.4mp evf
>under fucking $1000
? Maybe sigma just does not pay shillers.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M1 Camera Software Paint Shop Pro Photo 12,01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:02:26 03:39:03 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 5000 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 12.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1200 Image Height 989 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Soft
>>2964152
We all love Sigma, but their cameras are shit.
>>2964154
you misspelled superior.
Hi /p/ !
I wanted to kows if you know ho to create this kind of red and black effect with photoshop ?
Thanks
>>2963325
That's a basic Tint effect.
Make a layer above an image and fill it with any color (in this case red), then change the blending mode to 'Color'.
Simply use VSCO(mobile app) new Nike red preset.
So I am ditching my old cannon T1i for a Pen-F. What does /p/ think about the new Pen-F and what can I do with my old cannon primes? I am sure my mom or someone would want the cannon but I don't think anyone I would give the cam to would want the primes
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
But for real, any reason you're downgrading in sensor size to one of the worst most overpriced MFT cameras>
>>2963145
I want something I can put in my pocket
>>2963185
Buy a coat with bigger pockets
im new to photography, im looking for a camera capable of extreme low light conditions, factors to consider?, recommendations? best of the best and budget options alike!
>>2962961
D750.
>>2962961
A7s2 is the current low light king, though pretty much all current generation cameras do amazingly well in low light (even the entry level cameras).
>>2962961
Best of the best, Sony A7sii
Best of the midrange, Sony A7s
Best of the budget, any second hand full frame non canon body
The A7s use sensors with much larger photosites (pixels), meaning far less noise at higher isos, the only factor to consider is that it "only" has 12 megapixels (obviously a trade off of the large photosites).
The A7sii has ibis, so a bit better for hand-held shots in low light if you're shooting stationary stuff.
No-one does better, it's sony's dedicated low light sensor that they refuse to sell to anyone else, the only other people that make sensors are canon and they're a decade behind when it comes to low light performance.
Why are vintage lenses so damn good?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-G900V Camera Software G900VVRU2DPG2 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3984 Image Height 2988 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:11:06 01:46:26 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 320 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 0.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 4.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3984 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID F16QLHF01SB
>>2959998
They aren't, you just couldn't afford good modern lenses.
>>2960000
This
Especially if it's made by canon, the only good camera and lens manufacturing company that exists
Any other company is for poor dags and people who buy them need to fucking neck themselves for being cuck faggot dumbasses who can't buy decent camera equipment made by canon ONLY
>>2959998
thorium
>FLICKR THREAD
Strange we don't have one already.
Post them.
Everybody assume Flickr will slowly drown after the Verizon thing i guess. But let's have a good thread anyway
https://www.flickr.com/photos/deathiscertainitshouruncertain/
>>2953339
Flickr is possibly dying in general, unfortunately.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ianlindo/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D810 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Photographer Ian Lindo Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 894 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 22 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:10:25 17:26:02 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 31 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 1/3 EV Metering Mode Other Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>Be me
>Keep posting my 3/10 photos because why not
>Recently noticed same people follow and like most of my pictures
>Dedcided to check out their profiles
>20k followed, 500k faved
It kills me inside that I got excited about bots following me...
Some arrested development that didn't make it into my last thread.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
Is this the most knowledgeable photography youtuber out there? He knows lenses, he's had more lenses than god. He knows more about lenses that the top five photographer youtubers combined. He's owned more than 1000 lenses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-yW4XcvFGg
the angry photographer doesn't know shit dude don't worry about it
this guy took TWELVE MINUTES TO GET TO THE POINT of this video. He repeated his initial points and elaborations 4 or 5 times, rambling as fuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfWdhCD0L60
Lightroom is showing this weird coloured image.
What to do?
Please help.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Apple Camera Model iPhone 5 Camera Software VSCO Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:11:16 19:49:34 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 50 Lens Aperture f/2.4 Brightness 3.2 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.12 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1836 Image Height 1377 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2966023
Can you upload the RAW?
Looks like colour inversion setting is on.
>>2966028
How to turn that off
What is the rule with color vs black and white? I heard film was supposed to be black and white and digital is supposed to be in color otherwise you are being an asshole
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T1i Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2011:09:22 16:16:55 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4752 Image Height 3168 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
nah, that's stupid.
shoot what you want, fuck the police.
Black and white photos are art, color photos are plebeian trash for Instagram.
Someone please explain this shit to me
>>2965138
It's called talent. It's okay that you don't understand.
>>2965138
looks like a crop of a shot taken with a telephoto lens