Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 270. page

A friend still uses the D300s even though he now has access to a D750. Claims he doesn't like the D750, but can't explain why. His photos on the D300s come out noisy as shit and just muddy in general. I'm starting to think he's going blind because he keeps submitting photos that look like garbage.

Sometimes I wish I could live in the past and just be happy with what I have, but some of the latest and greatest tech does make my job easier, but I'm also more in debt. FML.

File: a7000.jpg (41KB, 595x411px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 595x411px

Oh Saint Rockwell, right in the feels.
Minolta a7000, gorgeous. Notice tat aperture control BUTTONS near the bayonet. I consider rebuying it.

>>2958834
Maria. She never loved me back and it was painful realizing it at the end of the relationship.
I never felt compassion to my gadgets though, all of them are tools no matter if professional or hobby use.

What kind of question is that?

>>2958714
Are you literally retarded?

The answer to both questions is yes

File: image.png (2MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1334x750px

>>2958714
>Sony

Fuck off you fucking autistic price of fucking shit, Sony makes the worst fucking cameras ever, and you should fucking kill yourself for not using the only reputable Brad

>Canon

The best company ever

The sensors are amazing
The lenses are to die for
The iq is amazing
The sensors are better

>sony

Absolute dogshit

Terrible sensors
Awful iq
Bad colors
No lenses
And they're fucking shit cameras for horrible autistic fucking morons

Fuck you

Pic related was shot on my trusty canon 5d mkIV

File: Untitled (3).jpg (458KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3272
Image Height	2224
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 09:35:32
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667

File: Untitled (13).jpg (596KB, 1000x1472px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 1000x1472px

>>2958237
shit that wasnt the white border one sorry everybody

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2216
Image Height	3280
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 09:47:42
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1472

File: Untitled (23).jpg (715KB, 1000x1466px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 1000x1466px

>>2958238

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2208
Image Height	3256
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:03 10:46:11
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	1466

>>2963133
>5 Shekels have been added to your account

>>2963133
whoever makes a small, retro-styled mirrorless camera body for their DSLR lenses (rather than creating their a separate line of lenses for mirrorless) will win the mirrorless wars

Why an A7?

Why not ask that manufacturers finally learn what to do with the screen and motherboard and push the sensor farther back, or remove the space to the rear of the focal plane.

That's where the problem lies, even Leica can't get this right.

>>2962948
The new godox models are pretty tasty, hss, built in wireless, good power, controls are acceptable (much better than metz), rechargeable li-ion battery packs.

>>2962952
Do you know what trigger is compatible with it?

The Yongnuo 565ex for Nikon is rather good. Haven't tried with a wireless trigger, but Yongnuo supplies those as well. Cost for a flash + transmitter (+ receiver?) should be well below 200 australian quatloos, via Honest Ali assuming it's got any chance of crossing customs unmolested. (just don't order them all at the same time; bigger packages attract more attention. like that 15" LED panel I got for film scanning, they figured it was a computer display. had to pay customs and tax on a 23€ gadget, lol.)

File: shitsnaps-2077.jpg (765KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

765KB, 800x1200px

>>2962608
2/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	300 dpcm
Image Created	2016:11:10 23:09:02
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: shitsnaps-2071.jpg (857KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 800x1200px

>>2962609
3/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	300 dpcm
Image Created	2016:11:10 23:02:21
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: shitsnaps-2067.jpg (725KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

725KB, 1200x800px

>>2962610
4/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpcm
Vertical Resolution	300 dpcm
Image Created	2016:11:10 23:05:41
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: HM705.jpg (257KB, 1296x730px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1296x730px

>>2949542
nope

>>2949551
>g lenses dont even work on an f3

File: 20160809-DSC01589.jpg (811KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 2000x1333px

>>2962899
>what is condensation?
>shooting with the kit lens
Step up Alexander.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Photographer	david mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:12 23:14:25
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	-2.3 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: IMG_7235rr.jpg (471KB, 1000x714px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 1000x714px

>>2962903

Sure enough, that's why I'm here. Funnily enough I just managed to scrape together the cash and got a decent lens, but sadly the kit lens will still be my work horse for the next year or so.

What do you do about condensation causing issues? I can't exactly stuff my lens with cotton wool or rice. Then again... no, I can't think of a way to make that work.

Are you sure that's the issue? This is from literally a few minutes later, and no flare. i did suspect it myself, but I just wanted to rule out anything else, so I can get rid of the issue full stop, or minimize it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Photographer	Alexander Allen-Mellars
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4788
Image Height	3420
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:11 16:52:50
Image Created	2016:11:10 23:23:47
Exposure Time	20 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.00 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	714
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto

>>2962909
You shouldnt be photographing at night. Wait until daytime when the sun is in the sky to give you the light required to be captured by the cameras sensor. Look up what the word photography means.

File: 1478641122570.jpg (34KB, 500x238px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x238px

blatant troll thread

Get a normal camera, convert to b&w.

Much more powerful as you have control over each colour channel. Monochrom is gimmickmeme as fuck.

>>2962778
>Should I consider getting into film instead

totally.

the thing with film is that you keep paying for your materials, but its so little that you dont feel it. like paying 10 bucks a month for a roll pack isnt gonna gut your budget, is it? get a spotmatic for barebones operation, an xa if you want pocketability, or the meme ae-1 if you like the canon logo.

just do it.

>>2962237
The scans aren't completely accurate.

>>2962237
Even if the scans were completely accurate, why not adjust the photo further? You can do it in the darkroom, why not in the scan.

>>2962237
>implying people didn't edit film photos before digital.
>implying when you get film processed it isn't automatically colour corrected and contrast boosted.

learn more before you embarrass yourself again.

File: WHAT_WHAT_WHAT_bart_blank.png (9KB, 738x312px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 738x312px

>>2962446
Here's your sweet template, share your gear failures with us.

File: IMG_6926.jpg (72KB, 500x291px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 500x291px

>>2962446
I think that the problem is you OP. Just give up NOW!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	500
Image Height	291
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2962446
What? You expected to take sneaky shots of little girls and instead you've got a scuba diving accountant? I don't understand.

>>2959818
VSCO Cam (iPhone and Android) or RNI Films (iPhone)

It won't quite look the same though, I'm presuming you'll be shooting on a phone due to "filter", but they're the best available.

>>2959818
VSCO try one of their Polaroid filters looks like it will come close

>>2959818
G'MIC Film Emulator

File: DSC_2206.jpg (1MB, 766x1100px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 766x1100px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2726
Image Height	4096
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:10 19:30:28
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	766
Image Height	1100

File: DSC_2218.jpg (909KB, 765x1100px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 765x1100px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2592
Image Height	3895
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:10 19:30:05
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	765
Image Height	1100

File: DSC_2240.jpg (541KB, 766x1100px) Image search: [Google]

541KB, 766x1100px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2700
Image Height	4057
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:11:10 19:23:58
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	766
Image Height	1100

>>2960909
rockwell/5

>>2960909
Too much sharpening but pretty nice colours and chill pic.

File: 20160910_105452-picsay48374.jpg (2MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1536px

Original for comparison.

File: unnamed.png (109KB, 416x354px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 416x354px

>>2960089
When the fuck is this coming out? Do you think it'll be good?

>>2960094
> When the fuck is this coming out?
Isn't it out already?

> Do you think it'll be good?
No.

In case that's some new model: I don't expect anything that would even make me mildly interested. It will almost certianly neither be cheap nor good.

Can we talk about Olympus? I've completely overlooked them the last few years due to being APS-C 4lyf but now I want more versatility than my X100T and the XPro2 is just a bit big and intimidating. I've been checking out The Olympus OM-D EM5 II and the PEN F but wondering if there's anything I should know before pulling the trigger.
I'm veering towards the PEN F as it's less DSLR-like and I find that goes a long way when shooting in the streets. Weather sealing isn't important to me.