Recommendations:
>Fantasy
Selected: http://i.imgur.com/r688cPe.jpg/
General: http://i.imgur.com/igBYngL.jpg/
Flowchart: http://i.imgur.com/uykqKJn.jpg/
CLANKED edition
What's your favorite book with robots?
Do we see enough automaton-based fantasy?
Are the robots our future?
>Sci-Fi
Selected: http://i.imgur.com/A96mTQX.jpg/
General: http://i.imgur.com/r55ODlL.jpg/ http://i.imgur.com/gNTrDmc.jpg/
>>8498819
I haven't ready any sci fi with cool robots. Any recs?
>>8498819
>http://i.imgur.com/r55ODlL.jpg/
>Consider Phlebas
>not Player of Games or Use of Weapons
meme chart desu
I've tried reading Jack Vance's Dying Earth and his writing seems pretty bad. Big disappointment since he's been touted as a huge influence on a lot of writers.
>He had but one fear; himself.
>He he he, that he had heeded Howard, ha ha, it was hardly horrible.
>>8498390
That should be a colon. Semicolons don't work in that context.
>>8498390
>He had but one fear; others.
>tfw I'm a virgin so I can't write about sex
Feels Borges man
Just watch porn you dip
>>8497225
Did Borges shack up with some fine brown 20 yo hunty when he was old and crusty af?
Chart thread.
Why do you use this junk when your level of comprehension suffers as a result?
>A new study which found that readers using a Kindle were "significantly" worse than paperback readers at recalling when events occurred in a mystery story is part of major new Europe-wide research looking at the impact of digitisation on the reading experience.
source: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/19/readers-absorb-less-kindles-paper-study-plot-ereader-digitisation
>Most studies have concluded that people read slower, less accurately and less comprehensively on screens than on paper.
source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/
>Half read on a Kindle and half read a paperback. Afterward the readers were tested on plot, character, objects and settings.The Kindle readers performed significantly worse on the plot reconstruction measure, i.e., when they were asked to place 14 events in the correct order,
source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/books/2014/08/19/book-buzz-study-finds-people-absorb-less-on-e-readers/14291189/
>>8495184
doesn't specify if it's an e-ink reader or not while also mentioning the use of ipads in the study. are you sure it's not comparing a kindle fire to reading a paperback?
>>8495184
>mystery story
PS: I bet you read translations
>>8495199
>>mystery story
That was just one study out of many
>PS: I bet you read translations
I'm fluent in 5 languages, and more than capable in 8. Everything I read is from original text.
I'm fascinated by fascism, which I not only see as a political ideology, but also as an art form. Can you recommend reading material on fascism with regards to fascist art?
italian fascist architecture is really interesting
>>8495119
Walter Benjamin's the Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.
>>8495119
Go on /his/ and shut the fuck up
Sup, /lit/. What courses we all doing? Required reading? Looking forward to it or not? Post your thoughts
Any Glasgow uni family in here?
Taking an honors seminar on (((Yiddish))) lit. I go to an East COAST school in the US, so these aren't hard to come by for any good goy with interest.
Reading Call It Sleep by Henry Roth rn and liking it.
Small town Midwest Liberal Arts school checking in here. I'm taking a great course on American Literature during and after the Civil War. Reading a lot of Whitman and Melville poems about war, Drum Taps is amazing. Otherwise, I'm just fucking around and getting random poli sci and english credits until I can go get a teacher's license and make high school kids whatever books I want them to.
Also, I volunteer by teaching in a prison which is pretty cool. Highly recommend doing some service-based learning before you leave college.
>>8493233
I applied for Glasgow but ended up going to Cardiff, pretty stoked to start next week
In terms of required reading I've got Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Oedipus Rex, Ovid's Metamorphoses and a few poems to read for the first few weeks
>I am literally starting with the greeks
Looking for best Anti-nihilist philosophy
>>8492366
If you're trying to lift yourself out of nihilism, you can't. The way out is through, and only the beast you become at the bottom of the pit is strong enough to claw its way out. You can maybe save your social life by becoming an ironic walking Bernard Black reference but either way you're doomed to at least a few more years of misery.
>>8492377
That's some deep shit, anon. Thank you.
>>8492366
my diary, desu
Thirty six kiwidollars
Dont forget to rate, post, like and subscribe
What are the red ones?
> rate
Don Quixote is good to read at least once; certainly not a 'keeper', in my opinion. Odyssey is good. Hobbit is trash.
Sorry a better picture
>>8491788
Read Pushkin before Dostoevsky. It may or may not help, but he likes to allude to Pushkin a lot.
Alright, enough with this meme drivel, you fucks. I would like someone to read my poetry over (not that you people are really qualified to do so), but it is so very bad that I would be too embarrassed to share it with anyone who is not behind a veil of anonymity. This thread is for those in a similar predicament, as I am sure there are many very bad poets around here. Prose is also welcome, so long as you believe your prose to have the same ends as poetry, and to be written in a poetic manner.
I will begin with two sonnets I've written. The second was at the behest of a professor of mine, which is why I subtitle it "A Schoolboy's Exercise," with the absurd hope that it may stand as an early work along with the likes of Milton's Prolusions, which generally are not terribly insightful in themselves, but which are illuminated by Milton's later grandeur. Of course, my education is not nearly so good as I would like and deserve, and so my writing suffers.
Sonnet: An Evening Online
If to the monocle-acquainted eye
The aeroplane and piston seemed profane,
It’d flood the ages’ gloaming with its cry
To suffer this too-enchanting window-pane.—
And yet to call it windowpane were wode:
The analogy would fail this ópaque lake
Aboding vermin and the verminous ode,
The wording destitute, the feeling fake.
‘Turning blankly toward the blank page, churning
‘With desire, stranded in a house on fire,’
Runs the ode, ‘I abandoned fecund learning
‘For mere abstraction; a sterile, lustful mire.’
Nor can be saved the drifting hedonist
By monkish virtues: only amethyst
In verbal landscapes questioningly laid
Can make the Angel able to be kisst.
Contradictory Sonnet (A Schoolboy’s Exercise)
When I do count the clock that tells the time,
I still may call that hue unto my sight
As shows in Earth in spite of burning lime,
Outpacing music’s evanescent light.
Think how the amberlaid soprano cleaves
Unto the accompaniment, yet still is heard
Above that mumming beat commanding leaves
To hang and fall in sepiatone, and bird
To sing piano. Therefore, two lives we make.
For that we ne’er will live so long, nor so
Inter eternal visions, we must forsake
That one which perjures or true fire or snow—
But, that life which shines the dark on blazoned Sense
Shall mire me, but send you baptized hence!
Bloom is officiating as a reminder of your inevitable physical and literary mortality. Of course, the job of poetry is ideally to defy the inevitable.
I guess I'll bump with more schlock until someone gives attention or asks for it. The second of these requires expansion. I think it to be my best poem so far (which is awful), but the meditation it implies needs more time to unfold. I'll have to at least double it while maintaining its reverent feel, which is difficult for me, because I'm not naturally reverent. Oh well.
The Sorrow of Literature
Think.
--The Waste Land, §II
Think of the brawling song in which achieves
The milky violence of a poet’s sigh.
One’s thought can make a harmony in sieves…
And yet the image of ‘milky violence’—Why?
Because the mournful myth of cadence dips
Beyond the living, loving World that leers
In laboring hands and every page that rips;
Is murdered; and becomes the domain of fears.
It dips, and now the clamorous Muse achieves
The fully empty heart that cannot sigh.
Dead leaves, the fruit of myth, are brought in sieves,
Whose sighs compose a silenced singing: Why?
Paean to Shakespeare
The lass who graces
This serest of spaces
Is indivorcible from Shakespeare.
She will seem an image isolated,
Undebated,
Yet know the debate was won by Shakespeare.
Her curls, you’ll surely say,
Smack of ambrosi-ay—
But know ambrosia is monopolized by Shakespeare.
Say: ‘Your gait, dear, traced in cloudy fluff
‘Is in form earthly enough;
‘Yet ambrosia is its stuff.
‘It is a like a play of Shakespeare.’
Say: ‘Your smile, dear, is philosopher and stone,
‘Yet it is not your own:
‘The first alchemy, and the first at alchemy, was Shakespeare.’
Shakespeare, Usurper-King!
Thy play’s the thing
Wherein Beauty taketh wing.
But, whoreson magus! the wing is always thine, Shakespeare.
One more bump. This is a metrical exercise of the worst kind. Formally, I was consistent, but I think it to be a truly ugly piece of writing. Pitifully, it is my longest poem also.
Commandment in Reverse
Beauty is momentary in the mind—
The fitful tracing of a portal;
--‘Peter Quince at the Clavier’, §IV
The banyan tree was fed
Upon an empty husk;
This poem, though born dead,
Shall smelly up the dusk.
It can’t do any better. Smell,
Though lowest of the passive senses,
Can by the figgy tree do well.
I won’t presume to use incenses.
Poetic inspiration, I’ve been told,
Is like a heightened epileptic fit:
Pressed tongue. The New assumes its throne; the Old
Expires. Heaney says, ‘I’ll dig with it’;
Or Beckett snatches grey ideas from out the foam;
Or Joyce engraves the Host upon a sooty face.
The entire enterprise becomes an onyx dome
Astride an emerald harboring a faery race.
And yet without that dome and race, the verses would go nude;
So Stevens pulses metaphysics’ strings; so pavement square
Comes to be haunted by white legs, and mind’s first quietude
Is burnt by shroudless Personage or concept. These all dare
A poet (how absurd!) toward actual expression. But Shakespeare knew
That absolute Construction must conceal all things t’reveal the One.
Obscurity should take its strange and truest Self: ‘A girl whose dew
‘Put Life, they say, to shame; for this verse first was gathered ‘neath the Sun.
‘From then on, prose will grow to rule the Earth. The dome’s obscuring tint o’erwhelms
The necessary hopelessness of nude ideas, dead in th’ heart. Enjamb-
Ment glints its bitter claw and beckons. No more the promise made by emerald helms
That house heads hollow, marching but to Poem’s simple beat. No more the Lamb.’
No poet claims this as the story of his Fall or his Decline: What is it then?
List, traveler: it is the grave of thought and self-appointed Creativity,
Who hails from indices and stars instead of rebel Bacchus and the Spirits’ din.
From this point on let these my lines flow backward, and the dangerous Truth my doctrine be.
Interesting, and in some ways excellent. Thanks for sharing, anon. Your wit and clever wordplay is refreshing, though oddly out of time: this reads like someone from Dryden and Pope's circle of friends, or Swift. Whence the Augustan sensibility? Do you like Horatian and Juvenalian satire? Have you read Lovecraft's hilarious Eliot send-up, Waste Paper? I enjoyed them all, even the "Shakespeare did it!" and lesser exercises. You have legitimate poetic dimensions and abilities, though they obviously serve your head more than your heart. Skill is not your stumbling-block, but sincerity might be, if you want to also write poetry that demands to be taken seriously, even at the risk of being scorned. It took Eliot a long time to stop winking at the reader for even a few lines. Just my two cents. I'm an adjunct prof, so I have seen a terrifying amount of amateur poetry (and real poetry too, of course).
Didn't see one. If you want feedback, have the courtesy to give other's the same treatment too. Don't just wait. It could be as simple as a feeling.
But please, you'll post whatever regardless.
>>8472400
This will be the opening scene of a short story I'm working on. I want the narration to be slightly erratic in order to compliment the main character's less than stellar mental state.
>>8472423
I don't like the uncle's second opening line. I want it to a bit less rambolic but still chiding. I didn't mean to separate his speech without an action in between, that's an error on my part.
>>8472435
Should I drop out of college and become a writer instead? I have a high IQ but I much rather spend all day every day reading fiction literature, history, and philosophy drinking coffee and smoking cigarettes. I'd live in a cheap studio in SF off SSI.
>>8505492
Sleep 8 hours today, read the biographies of Edgar Allen Poe and Herman Melville, and then reconsider.
>>8505492
i did. would not recommend.
I'd like to read a novel like Loveless or Isn't Anything.
Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf
>>8505407
In terms of the whole point being less about the content of the work and more about its style and form, particularly the way in which the form actually obscures and distorts the subject matter and draws attention to this distortion, I'd unmemeingly recommend Ulysses and other formally-fucky high modernist novels as shoegaze-esque.
>>8505441
Ulysses is not like that.
I'll start with a few.
>Creepy rich stalker who has no depth or meaning to his life wants to get laid so much that he dies.
>>8505237
>A petulant imbecile and his cohorts use satanic rituals to thwart the plans of Magic Snake Hitler.
>>8505237
>A farm hand learns the value of eugenics.
>>8505237
Mein Kampf and Schopenhauer's 'On Women': everything they say is true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohc8Fs-X6gU
Can anyone provide a solid retort against traditionalism without resorting to namecalling and silly synecdoches like "fascism", which are supposed to trigger people into disagreement through emotionality rather than reason?
not literature
fuck off
>>8505038
traditionalism has already failed to support itself against technologically driven socialism
the traditional world is being bulldozed for the uberwomb because its safer for childbearers and Julius Evola has yet to catch on with pregnant women (or men)
>>8505065
What world are leftists living in? Why do you remain so deluded about your imminent success?
Reactionaries are on the rise, everywhere, from the alt right around Trump to Moscow having Evolians in their thinks tanks. A social democratic couldn't even get the nomination for president and Europe is turning to the far right with every new wave of refugees.