Chart thread.
/lit/ Philosophy Project 1.2
https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub
>>8497221
the kingdom of God is within you should be on this list.
Would anyone be so kind as to post a chart for Asian/Eastern philosophy?
>>8499036
I have those
>>8499036
>>8499084
>>8497246
Does anyone have any similar charts?
>>8497196
But which translation of Faust do I get?
>translation
>>8497209
>no Lucretius
WTF?
can anyone post a Nabokov chart?
>>8497196
Which one is the best to start with Mrs. Dalloway or To the lighthouse?
>>8499626
>>8499641
Silly anon, that's not what I wanted!
>>8499109
Oxford World Classics edition, by Steven Lukes
>>8497220
well maymayed
>>8499109
Princeton Classics, Stuart Atkins translation.
>>8499629
The Voyage Out
You'll thank me at the end of your Woolf journey.
>>8497206
too conventional, suk a dik
>>8497196
>I'm too dumb to read the sticky thread
Kys, reddit.
>>8497209
I missed the Gibbon is bad meme, why is that?
>>8497209
This chart is so shit, one of these days I'm going to make a better one
>>8499036
I've got this thing.
>>8502518
what is shit about it?
>>8502924
>Storm of Steel
>Demons
>Master and Margarita
what is right-wing about them
>>8499109
Just get a bilingual edition. That's what I did, best purchase this month
Anyone got the chart that starts with the Golden Bough and then goes to Mircea Eliade, and Freud and Jung etc?
>>8499641
>Simone De Beauvoir
>Homosexual
She fucked Sarte for like her entire life.
>>8500024
Subtle bait, I like it.
>>8503918
You know what's interesting? The maker is just honestly to god retarded.
>>8497246
>Epicurus
>hedonist
Someone clearly fell asleep in their philosophy class...
>>8504207
Epicurus was a hedonist. He was just a negative hedonist (i.e., avoiding pain is to be preferred far above seeking pleasure).
Mostly Philosophical /lit/
>>8497196
>gulliver's travels
it's shit
Does anyone have an escapism chart? I remember I saw one.
Is there a nonfiction chart?
>>8502924
More, please.
>>8505079
mods ples
>>8504338
is it really worth reading so many primary sources on philosophy?
i feel like translations really fuck up some otherwise great works and require some outside knowledge and interpretation to truly understand. same goes with ancient literature - without secondary literature to explain the context and culture of the time, reading it on your own will most likely lead to incredible misunderstanding
>>8503016
You should be asking why Storm of Steel is Fiction, isn't it memoirs?
anyone got a french lit chart?