https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohc 8Fs-X6gU Can anyone pro

not literature
fuck off

File: bigmouthbillybass.jpg (80KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x720px

>>8505038

traditionalism has already failed to support itself against technologically driven socialism

the traditional world is being bulldozed for the uberwomb because its safer for childbearers and Julius Evola has yet to catch on with pregnant women (or men)

>>8505065

What world are leftists living in? Why do you remain so deluded about your imminent success?

Reactionaries are on the rise, everywhere, from the alt right around Trump to Moscow having Evolians in their thinks tanks. A social democratic couldn't even get the nomination for president and Europe is turning to the far right with every new wave of refugees.

>>8505196
agreed

>>8505038
When traditionalists get power, innovation
or "progress" in its truest sense suffers.
World governments have to innovate,
because they won't survive otherwise.
Of course, you could argue that people like
your mate Hitler innovated things, but that
overlooks the fact that I'm shitposting yoooou,

File: fuckoffwerefull.jpg (61KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 480x360px

>>8505177

and yet they're using iPhones, automobiles, and get their pills from Pfizer and Bayer

aside from their twitter histories they're culturally identitical to leftists and are living on the economic manipulation of real "traditionalists"

China has publicly announced it will genetically engineer superbabies, how do the neo-Amish plan on competing for resources with those?