Where are all the contemporary Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean and Japanese philosophers?
Asians are clockwork termites with no souls
Philosophy is bullshit cooked up by Plato, why should any other culture care about it?
>>8501852
I wasn't aware that Indian and Chinese philosophy were also cooked up by Plato.
Fucking eurocentrist ancap piece of shit.
>work as an editor
>get submission from cute girl
>>8501787
Eww girls are inferior to men take the redpill and pick a waifu instead
Anime rules!
>>8501796
this, OP
don't be unfair and reject it even though you know it will be soulless garbage
give it its fair shake and then throw it out with the rest of the trash
>>8501796
this t b h
is there really an alcohol/writer connection? now that im in my mid/late 20s a hungover puts me out of commission for a couple days
>>8501724
That's only because you don't drink everyday
No, writers that drink were good before they began drinking heavily, or at least were on the trajectory to being great
>tfw you've been hungover for literally years
Is this worth checking out?
It's pretty recent as far as literature goes but I noticed Harold Bloom had quite a lot of praise for it, and it has a movie coming out fairly soon.
Jewish coprophilia
>>8501668
It's brilliant. So is Sabbath's theatre
>>8501751
Not OP but I don't quite 'get' why it's so brilliant. I read it a few years a go and it was sort of an interesting story I guess, how the dad who had had everything throughout his life raised a terrorist, but that's about as far as I really 'got' it. What am I missing?
Have anyone of you read un homme qui dort in french? What's the level of language? I've been learning french for 2 years now and I'm wondering if I will manage to read it
>>8501640
>a man who dort
hahaha
>>8501642
that's a serious question
>>8501640
Don't worry about the level, Un homme qui dort is an appropriate novel for you. Read it, it's a short book.
Whose works are you reading right now, /lit/?
I'm going through Rousseau's stuff right now. Most of it, anyway.
Also, does anyone have this picture without all the bullshit added text in it?
>>8501630
I got you, senpai
i have never read original writings of a philosopher, except for some plato, which was a total waste of my time. is there any reason not to just read overviews?
>>8501630
>Socrates
>must read
Really makes you think.
Favourite /lit/ documentaries?
my video diary desu
>>8501594
post it senpai
>>8501584
Some docu about Thomas Bernhard i once watched was pretty neat
I'm about to start In Search of Lost Time. What am I in for? Am I about to be meme'd?
Please just fuck off and read it.
When will this fat sack of shit drop dead?
>>8501345
why are you such an angry faggot?
Soon. He's pretty old.
>>8501345
is he reading חלומו של המחט
What do we think about alain de botton and the school of life?
Hack?
>What do WE think
The royal we think you should form your own opinions, like a healthy free-thinking adult.
...desu~
>>8501344
<implying humans dont think together
fuckn pleb
>>8501360
I guess I just subscribe to the notion that groupthink is something to consciously avoid rather than embrace.
Can i tell you guys a secret?
I am a degenerate. This (pic related) is my favorite book. I recognize the formal weaknesses of Miller's writing and the criticisms that can and have been leveled at him, but I had one of those 'lifechanging' experiences with his books that lesser people seem to have with dredge like kerouac.
if there is spirituality to be found anywhere in the last century, it is to be found in Miller. I encourage you to disagree with me just so long as you are honest with yourself.
also black spring is simply god tier writing.
I want to tell you a secret..but everyone probably knows except you. You can judge a persons tastes by his favorite book sometimes and what kind of reader he is, this book shows you're the worst kind of pleb that exists under the tropic of pleb.
>>8501271
thank you, newfriend
>>8501266
but he is universally recognised as classic who transcenteded beatnicks
>I recognize the formal weaknesses of Miller
no such thing
This was considered appropriate reading for American sixth graders in the mid-19th century.
and?
>>8501318
They were smarter
>>8501217
This is Mary-Elizabeth Winstead in 2016.
does /lit/ write in the margins?
I can't write.
I can't think.
I can't go on.
>book has a foreword, a preface and an introduction
JUST LET ME LIVE MY LIFE
>he skipped the intro and later asks /lit/ to get answers by people who read the intro
>book has a forward, a preface, a translator's preface, an introduction, an author's introduction to the first, second, and third editions
>read all of it
>index
>bibliography
>mfw someone tore out the pages containing the actual book
What's lit's idea about À rebours (Against Nature)?
Is it an easy book, which could be read without prior knowledge about 19th century's literary movements?
someone explain what they meant by this
>>8501115
its pretty readable, huysmans' problems with naturalism are pretty thoroughly explained. you would be better served by knowing a good amount about latin/early christian literature: the best chapter of the book are des esseintes thoughts on writers throughout history with specific focus on writers like that; Cicero, Apuleius, Augustine, Claudian etc.
>>8501143
I don't want to wait for 47 fucking years.