Is there a more /lit/ nation than Russia?
>>8516770
In the west the argument would have been about how women and nonwhites are oppressed and the victim would've been a white malemy entire weltanschauung is informed by 4chan memes
those fags on /int/ tried to convince me slavs were all dumb apes
this could never happen in the west today
>>8516827
It is possible that Russia is the only country in the world where you can get beaten up for saying you don't like Dostoevsky
Hmm. Favorite cat literature?
>>8516767
My diary, desu
Time Cat
Natsume Soseki - Kokoro
Post what your currently reading.
Pleb here.
>>8516684
Re-reading Schopenhauer's 'On Women'
Starting The Golden Bowl
>>8516684
Picture of Dorian Grey
what does /lit/ think of this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlfnY9TNa5g
>>8516606
Its great to see a passionate patrician at such a young age. Keep fighting the good fight kid
Has he down a DFW video?
he's a wee "troll" faggot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJcTqIjRfY
What's some metrically interesting poetry?
I'm a student composer. Rhythm has always been my weakness, except when I set poetry to music. Tennyson particularly has been great for this, I've found. I don't want to write another art song right now, I'm just looking for something to draw rhythms from.
>>8516598
This website is pretty interesting if you would to practice scansion. Go to the hardest difficulty setting and you'll find some bizarre metres
http://prosody.lib.virginia.edu/
>>8516617
>scansion
>prosody
So those are the terms for this sort of this.
This is really cool, actually, thanks.
>>8516598
Yeah Tennyson is one of the best, a meteical virtuoso. Maud in particular.
C.S Pierce
what are his accomplishments?
He believed in the spiritual supremacy of the white race which is pretty cool IMHO DESU SENPAI
>>8516581
so did Kant and Hegel, both also believed in the supremacy of the White Man
answer the question though?
>>8516595
he's the father of pragmatism which is a delightful school of american philosophy which is often overlooked because of eurofetishism
If I strive to just find the deepest, most thought provoking experience in a book that I possibly can, which will change the way I view the world and give me new reason to live, without some supernatural superstitious crap attached to it to give me false hope, what would that extraordinarily intelligent book be? I was thinking about reading infinite jest, buying a big ol hardcover copy of it too.
>>8516574
Wow, thay dude on the right is salty as salt.
>what would that extraordinarily intelligent book be?
I am me, you are you, how am I meant to know?
Start with the bibliography of John Green, and go from there.
>>8516574
I like steve way more than linda. so sick of running into fucking cunts like that, concerned with being 'liked' by all the other vapid cunts concerned with being 'liked' at the office. if i was picking friends i'd rather have one steve than thirty lindas. steve says and thinks interesting things, linda takes instagram selfies with friends for literally an hour before everyone heads to the club. perhaps linda goes to europe but it is a hollow experience anyways and she should kill herself.
Is he the only decent existentialist?
>>8516537
Camus, if anything, is a decent novelist. He is also an existentialist. Does that work?
Nietzsche and Kierkegaard can also be considered existentialists. So there is that.
>>8516537
He wasn't really an existentialist, so yeah pretty much
no but my ex had an apartment in the street he lived in. not kidding. i plowed my ex less than 200m from where this guy came up with the most inane shit.
Started reading CoL49, got to Chapter 3 and there's this:
>Nicholas having freed the serfs in 1861
Which is weird, since the year is correct, but it was Alexander II who did it. What the hell? I thought this guy spent the years between his novels in libraries doing research.
>>8516530
you got meme'd son
>>8516530
BZZZT
Pynch'd again!
>>8516530
the novel is about broken communication, meaningless signs, ostensible facts
I guess that is why a statement is wrong?
I never noticed that, but I know jack shit about the topic anyway
Anyone else here reading this?
I just read the first chapter and i'm already sucked in.
>>8516444
Why would you read a book written by a serial killer?
>>8516444
>not giving a f*ck
I just read the OP and i'm already sucked in.
I know homosexuality was never mentioned in the Giver, but given the dystopian nature of the society and their philosophy, what do you theorize would happen to homosexuals in their society, especially since that cannot be detected at infancy, and they mostly to aim at that age for exterminating "unwanteds".
I know they like to live in a black and white world without religion or color to cause division, but how would human sexuality fit in since it is such a continuum with such variables? Would they just let gay men live in peace with the rest of them and marry or would they kill them, and wouldn't killing them for loving the same sex in of itself cause division in society?
How do you think homosexuality would fit into the universe of The Giver /lit/?
this book sucks
>>8516442
God damn this is a shitty post.
>>8516446
You're wrong. It's my all time favorite book.
What do I have to read before reading "my diary desu" to get the most out of it?
>>8516402
'Mio diarrhea' by Desu
>>8516402
Le diary de desu
I hope you did the "Start with the greeks" starter pack youcuck
Tell me /lit/ why do you think nihilism is so often associated with pessimism and depression? And more importantly why is it all the time taken for granted on here that it's the ultimate (anti-)truth and ultimate (anti-)foundation?
Can I ask for a justification please?
>>8516381
Fuck off, frog retard
>>8516381
>frog poster
>asks retarded question
hmm
Imo it's faulty reasoning, first and foremost the classic is/ought fallacy. Existence without purpose, no objective truth and so on are descriptive claims not to be confused with (the rejection of) moral claims and if an "is" does shape your "ought" we are not speaking of a philosophy but of something related to psychology, biology, neuroscience etc. We may philosophize about why nihilism and a pessimistic outlook on life correlate *through psychology* etc. perhaps after seeing convincing studies (or just making armchair observations like sigmund) or that once you *psychologically* accept/believe in nihilism you are free (relative to the degree/intensity of your belief) to do whatever you want because of a loss of conscience and so on -- but all of this applies only if this "is" has *psychological* impact on your "ought" (or even shapes it completely but as we all know there are no real nihilists).
So basically none of this follows philosophically. To make any normative claims from nihilism can only be the result of human fickleness explained through psychology, evolution, biochemicals and so on.
And shit, as long as we have the potential to feel and do good in this world how about we do that instead of shitting our pants and moping around because the mighty Logos has failed us? Love doesn't need an explanation.
>Memory believes before knowing remembers. Believes longer than recollects, longer than knowing even wonders.
What did he mean by this?
>>8516378
he meant "look ma I'm being profound"
>>8516378
Sounds like something that dumbass Plato would write.
Epicurus isn't making me happy.
How do I become happy?
If you don't exclusively sit in a garden all day quoting Epicurus with your friends you're not doing it right, and you will never escape pain.
>>8516330
It's too hot for that.
>>8516305
Why do you want to be happy?