Which philosophers will help me to accurately predict the future?
>>8854855
all you need is i ching
>>8854855
David Hume, because only then you'll realize you can't predict the future.
it comes from your own soul not any external
a good understanding of the world helps
I'm looking to get my parents some books for Christmas, but even though I have a good foundation for knowledge of literature, I'm having a pretty hard time deciding on what to get. My mom is a schoolteacher and a bit willingly-ignorant, and my dad is a really smart working class guy that hasn't picked up a book in years but enjoys history. I'm not really counting on either of them to finish the books I give them, but I'd be glad if the books suited them enough that they would be compelled to give them a solid shot.
I originally thought about Moby Dick for my dad, and Middlemarch for my mom, but then I decided that Moby Dick would probably be a bit of a battle to start reading as a reintroduction to literature, and I thought Middlemarch might go over my mom's head.
I'd be happy to give out any recommendations for holiday gifts or whatever if anyone has any questions. Thanks for reading.
>>8854793
Don't buy doorstoppers for people that don't read.
Maybe A Chess Story or Butcher's Crossing for your dad, something masculine but introspective. Slaughterhouse 5 might also be good
Flowers for Algernon might be good for your mom. If you think she'd enjoy Middlemarch but might be overwhelmed by its size, To the Lighthouse is a great alternative
>>8854793
The Brothers K or Little, Big for mom. Little, Big may be hard for her though, but my mom loved it.
Dads love Killer Angels. If you want something past that I could see him liking Dune.
>le push my own interests on others as gifts meme
you're a bad son as well as a bad person
I've never read a book but I want to. Where should I start?
After abstaining from reading a book since the Harry Potter craze as child, I unironically picked up Infinite Jest in my early 20's and loved it.
>>8854774
with the greeks of course
>>8854817
Are there follow up guides?
So is this book worth reading? Gimme pros and cons about this series.
i fapped to these books in 7th grade
Cons:
It's young adult genre fiction.
Pros:
It's on the better side of young adult genre fiction.
If you're a teenager growing up in the early 2000s I would highly recommend it. As well as the Power 5 series, Alex Rider, Artemis Fowl and His Dark Materials.
>>8854794
idk, it took a darker take on "superkewl teenspy" kinda further. And I do agreed it's a better written ya novel than we have nowadays. And artemis fowl was my shit back then.
Eagles
>>8854727
Yup checks out
And the fucking songs, everything else is amazing
>>8854727
Tom Bombadill.
Why do you all worry about not getting published?
I laugh to myself each time I see one of those threads on /lit/ asking for publishing advice or something of the sort. This attitude is in no way literary. In fact, it is pathetic. I am like you, anon: I write. I write excellent books. But never for once have I thought about publishing any of my work, and that is because I know for sure that my work is in a realm of its own, and to have it on a shelf beside other books in a library, is a shame. I also know for sure that after I commit suicide, my writings would gain more attention, and people would hail me as a genius for generations to come. I will become immortal. My name will be carved in the Literary Stone beside the names of Shakespeare, Cicero, etcetera. I do not need a publisher to publish my work; I am my own publisher.
>>8854725
Godspeed, anon.
>>8854725
>I am my own publisher.
Gloria Tesch, pls.
Obvious bait, but how do you suppose your writing will get "discovered" after your death if you've never published anything during your lifetime? One of your buddies is gonna find it on your computer somehow and be like "damn this is nice better call up the publishers"?
The Language of the Birds was considered a secret
youtu.be/dJz0TzGEuFA
Stories began to accumulate, it became clear that the stories themselves were important, the collection of stories was a strange and wonderful garden we could all explore, marvel at the further frontiers of human consciousness what the ancients believed to be our highest purpose
Give way to a new cultural emphasis on discovering and expanding, ever perfecting our own consciousness, our own will, our own metaphysical gravity, our own destiny, our own inner garden
>>8854673
This guy seems like he's on the brink of tears talking about the cultural wasteland we're in
Just finished reading Moby Dick. AMA.
why the long face?
>>8854577
Is there a better whale in fiction?
>>8854577
Why the noose? You sad because you're wasting your meaningless existence reading about whales?
Going to read this, what am I in for? I read that it's "one of humanities finest achivements". I read C&P and its probably my favorite novel ever
I've never seen this book described as such. One is actually more inclined to say that it's his worst novel, from my experience at least.
It's not bad of course, it just isn't better than any one of his other four major works.
>>8854636
>I've never seen this book described as such
Im refferinf to this wiki excerpt:
According to Ronald Hingley, it is Dostoyevsky's "greatest onslaught on Nihilism", and "one of humanity's most impressive achievements—perhaps even its supreme achievement—in the art of prose fiction."
>>8854636
Is it better to read the idiot first?
Other than /lit/, what sites do you visit regularly?
>>8854547
>Farah, London
>>8854547
Pornhub
>>8854561
>Reddit (mostly SRS and /r/communism)
>tumblr (for art stuff)
you need to go back
>>8854565
> Paki
>hot cousin
you need to go back
What is some /lit/ approved cyberpunk? I am totally new to this genre, but intrigued by the aesthetic.
>>8854518
Reminder
https://warosu.org/lit/thread/S1000000#p1000000
Fuck you Dean.
>>8854518
neuromancer.
of course someone will probably jump on this thread and slam it because its genre fiction and they want to look smart in front of their anonymous autistic audience. however, it's still a fun read and the atmosphere is genuine cyberpunk.
>>8854518
Also, PKD is generally well liked. I will say Titus Alone too though that's proto steam punk but I don't really care. Same shit.
So why exactly is this book considered to be one of the great modern classics of American literature? I just finished it and it was a chore to read. It's just endless repetitive descriptions of death, violence, and bleak landscapes passed through a filter of awkward and archaic prose that people seem to love for some reason. Maybe I'm just a pleb.
>>8854512
are you being unironic?
>>8854530
yes
>>8854549
That poorly drawn cartoon might indicate otherwise
Who is the David Foster Wallace of literature?
>>8854505
>>8854505
Araki Hirohiko
>>8854505
David Foster Wallace himself?
War and Peace Read-through: DAY ONE
So, this is the first of the twenty-one days.
How are we all doing? What are we all thinking? First impressions
I know I said I’d make a better chart today but I didn’t have time so I’ll do it tomorrow (promise)
How many of us have read it before, how many are reading it for the first time?
Probably most importantly, now we’ve read a little bit, what do folk think about the pace? Is fifty a day going to be okay? It took a little longer than I expected (reading footnotes etc.) but I reckon it’s fine for me. But I’ve got a lot of time on my hands, so I wanna find out what everyone else thinks.
>>8854469
*first of the twenty-five days
fug
>>8854469
About ~25 pages in, havent had much time to read but will finish later tonight. 50 pages a day seems like a easily sustainable pace. How important are the footnotes? The version im reading on kindle doesnt include them.
Yeh nigga
Gonna finish this Against the Day chapter then gonna start. You're using the Oxford World Classics edition, right?
Is it worth reading this guy if I am an adult who has never before touched his work?
>>8854423
His autobiography "Surprised by Joy" is excellent. I used to be a Christfag and read him but I haven't lost any respect for him since then.
>>8854440
Thanks for the rec, mate.
>>8854423
No. Anyone who believes in the Jesus story is obviously not capable of critical thought.