What's better, a carrier that has a ramp, or a carrier that has no urinals?
http://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2017/07/21/no-urinals-on-the-new-navy-aircraft-carrier/
>>34657019
seamen will just start pissing off the sides of the ship, the sinks, etc.
there will never really be enough females on a ship to matter. in the way that the designers supposedly think it will. Every so often you might have a few extra female officers or enlisted that have to walk to a hall a little more.
I hope they at least put a shitter on the hangar deck. the nimitz class doesn't have shitters on the hangar deck. you have to go to the super structure and go up or down several decks to find a shitter. which is terribly inconvenient
muh vagina aside, this is just a dumb move ecologically speaking because toilets are way less water efficient than urinals. Or do carriers use sea water for that sort of thing? I don't know.
NO
FUCKING
URINALS
ENJOY YOUR $10 billion no urinal carriers JAJAJAJAJAJJAJAJAJAJA
>Pastebin, look here first!
https://pastebin.com/cXZTGafD
>Theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdmhyEqCINM
>>34656623
thanks Ai
>>34656657
I'm not Ai?
>>34656666
oooohhhhh
What's /k/'s thoughts on the Irish Army Ranger Wing?
Also general special forces thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wIKck2idVI
It must be a shame going through all the blood sweat and tears to become a tier one unit of a country that doesn't do anything militarily, especially when you could have been in the SAS/SBS instead
>>34656434
This guy gets it.
>>34656434
Stop going after LARPing, everyone can have a hobby.
Let's discuss nukes, /k/.
>>34656192
Nukes r banned mkay
>>34656192
I live near the largest stockpile of US nukes. Its actually right near an airport lol
It will be interesting to see how many go off and under what circumstances when we waste N. Korea.
legacy ACORN edition
old >>34652248
Vortex Razor soon
>>34655366
I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.
>>34655384
Upgraded stock when?
Does anybody have /k/ool operator pics and stories to share?
>>34654745
>>34654745
No
AK General /akg/
Ribbed And Sanctioned Edition
>Thread #366
Old thread here >>34648016
>AK Buyer's Guide
http://pastebin.com/YdEkhdva
Looks like century has the golden kitty now.
https://www.ammoland.com/2017/07/century-arms-announces-new-7-62-x-39mm-ammo/
Help a nigga out
>>34654186
grey shop
special russia shop
5.45 facebook stop or ebay
i bought my slav stuff from them
>>34654511
Thanks senpai, I'll check it out.
>>34654186
Whilst this thread still kinda has momentum, Does anyone know where to get a full suit of Lithuanian M05?
>>34653995
*Throws chicken on ground*
*has beetus induced heart attack*
>pick up rifle
>leave
>add to collection
I play my poke flute
>Mines kill children!
>Cluster bombs hurt more civilians than they do soldiers!
>Napalm and white phosphorus are inhumane!
>"wide area effect" weapons are indiscriminate and might hurt innocents!
Is anyone else sick of "humanitarian" organizations shitting themselves with fear & anger any time someone uses a weapon more advanced than a pointy stick? Civilian casualties are terrible, yes, but do these people think for one second that if war broke out between two first-world powers they'd actually stick to their treaties and agreements over what weapons they're allowed to use?
I, personally, believe the only reason these groups are so up in arms over these weapons is because they're being used on opponents that couldn't possibly threaten them. If ISIS were fully mobilized and performing a large scale beach assault along the west coast you can bet your ass they'd be screaming for the whole of California to be turned into one giant, fire-spewing cluster minefield.
What's your opinion on "unethical" weapons on the battlefield, /k/? Should we try to regulate war as best we can, or should we accept that treaties and agreements are only as strong as the paper they're written on?
>>34653748
Whatever one side sees as "unethical", the other sees as a weakness. Limiting your abilities on the battlefield is a sure way to lose.
>>34653809
Go back to >>>/a/ and stay there.
>>34653748
>do these people think for one second that if war broke out between two first-world powers they'd actually stick to their treaties and agreements over what weapons they're allowed to use?
Yes. The agreements and treaties were made by warring nations in the first place, who saw the usage of these weapons and decided together to put an end to it. What do you think would happen to the losing nation in a serious war, if it violated these agreements?
>or should we accept that treaties and agreements are only as strong as the paper they're written on?
The treaties are as strong as the punishments nations are willing to dole out for breaking them. What country is willing to risk the consequences just so they can use some moderately effective weapons that the enemy isn't using either?
Congratulations, /k/! You have somehow received near unlimited funding to build the best bunker possible to survive as many realistic scenarios as possible. What will it look like? Will you just buy an old missile silo and renovate it? What kind of water/air purification systems will you include? What will be your electricity source? How much food and water will you store, and what food will it be? And if someone manages to break in, what will you do to defend your bunker and its resources?
>>34653656
Bump
Buy that missile bunker and manufacture LSD, DMT and MDMA while I fuck my stripper gf and make my neckbeard friend watch from the corner. It'll work out flawlessly until the bitch rats me out.
>>34653656
Why did the Soviet Union hold the military technology advantage for most of the Cold War?
Why did they lose that edge in the last decade of the Cold War (the 80's)
>>34653569
I remember Gorbatschow saying that Chernobyl was a major contributor to the crash of the rubel.
Other than that, no Idea. Maybe some other Anon has more Details.
>>34653569
>Why did the Soviet Union hold the military technology advantage for most of the Cold War?
they did not
the Soviet was chasing a different goal from the American
for example
they invested tons of money into passive night sight for tank, gun launch ATGM, ERA, APS
meanwhile the west developed thermal sight and effective ballistic com
>>34653569
Money. They started to run out and the US didn't.
The US Moon Missions helped with that as did disasters in the USSR.
> In Syria, it's very hot in the summer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKpLEadWFzQ
Fresh propaganda, right off the press.
https://jacobinmag.com/2017/07/syria-chemical-attack-assad-trump
Teamwork edition
Previous thread:
>>34625513
Still saving up for a scar.
Fuck bills and short work weeks
>>34652621
You're doing it right. Steady and consistent saving is the mark of a man.
Time to play this game again.
The Challenge: You have the opportunity to go back in time, arriving on the east coast of North America circa 1650, and your goal is to cross the North American continent, taking as much time as you need. When/if you reach the Pacific coastline, you’ll be transported back to the present day. Your equipment for this journey will be as follows (taken back in the time capsule with you):
— enough provisions for the first five days’ travel
— a backpack containing some clothing essentials
— a winter coat, raincoat and boots
— waterproof sleeping bag
— an axe, and a small sharpening stone
— a box of 1,000 “strike anywhere” waterproof matches
— a portable water filtration system
— a topographic map of North America
— binoculars and a compass
— a current U.S. Army First Aid kit
— ONE long gun, shotgun or rifle (and 800 rounds, no interchangeable-barrel rifles like a Thompson Center Encore or Blaser; drillings are acceptable, but you still only get 800 rounds of ammo, total)
— ONE handgun (and 1,000 rounds)
— and TWO knives (can include multi-tool knives like Leatherman).
Once there, you’ll be given a horse, a mule and a dog — but apart from that, you’re on your own. Remember you’ll be traveling through deep woods, open prairie, desert and mountains. You may encounter hostile Indian tribes and dangerous animals en route, which should be considered when you answer the following questions (and only these):
1. What long gun would you take back in time with you?
2. What handgun?
3. What knives?
>>34652327
PS you will win 20 Million in Gold and some land rights in a state of a your choice if you win
>>34652327
M-16 for wasting forrest gooks quickly and a .50 Cal desert eagle for when you get rushed by a bear.
Skinning and bowie knife
Inb4 Comanche hacks you apart while you're still breathing and scalps you
>>34652327
10.5 inch Noveske SBR
CZ P-09
Solingen Bowie and Esee Avispa