What would you do in this situation?
>>33073815
Pull the trigger
Hope my hammer was cocked.
Use my autistic savant-like knowledge of firearms to recall which pistol has the lighter trigger pull and if it's mine, pull the trigger.
How does one defend themselves from such an attack?
Especially if the police run away as in this instance?
>Guns are capable of harmful and fatal consequences;and gun laws are quite stringent in Sweden. To be a gun owner requires a license, and this is tightly controlled by regulations. A potential gun owner needs to meet strict requirements to be granted a license.
>>33073771
the whole thing with napalm is that theres no way to defend from it
just stay inside and away from shitskins and you'll be fine.
>>33073783
>just stay inside and away from shitskins and you'll be fine
So... surrender and hide in your own country?
Feels bad, man.
>>33073771
You can't do shit about napalm. You have to kill the person before they throw it.
see >>33073783 >>33073814
The closest we'll ever get to a Glock with a 1911-like trigger?
Redpill me on why this isn't worth it.
https://youtu.be/vQjSMT46bIM?t=54s
>>33073282
Because it's $180
>redpill
Thread hidden
>>33073282
Or you could get a 1911 instead
Is this guy /k/?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJd8vtbC7c8&app=desktop
Not going to lie, that was pretty /k/ indeed.
>>33073042
I enjoyed that
With the reliability, and durability of modern optics, are BUIS still necessary?
Is it worth sacrificing eye relief for something that likely won't be used?
>>33073034
yes you faggot
>>33073041
Fpbp
>>33073034
You can have both and it's silly not to figure out that solution, even if you're Frank Proctor.
Taking for example, pic related, it's fucking CCO and doesn't have set eye relief, so not putting some folding BUIS behind it is just silly.
Hey /k/ I was looking to buy a double action 44 magnum and am currently set on a S&W model 29 does anyone have one and would recommend it or perhaps another different 44
Model 29 is the gold standard.
Anyone else says different is just trying to justify their shitty purchase.
Ive got a model 29 with a 4" barrel and factory engraving. Its a sweet gun anon..
Kill yourself, revolverfag. It's bad enough to be a revolverfag, it's even worse to be a revolverfag for a useless cartridge in a memegun.
>hey anon, im sad, how do I shoot?
As a guy that studies female integration in the army for a living, these threads always make me smile.
>>33072642
Every african children above the age 12 knows that, why not you?
Point the bang stick and pull the trigger
Is there any skill in flying combat aircraft nowadays or is it just having enough strenght to absorb the Gs and pushing some things on a keyboard ?
>>33072094
>Is there any skill in flying combat aircraft nowadays
Yes it takes an enormous amount of skill and talent. Flying in real life is not like in the video games.
>is it just having enough strenght to absorb the Gs and pushing some things on a keyboard ?
No matter how strong you are, you will never feel strong enough to pull the hardest and longest G. Even Gym Junkies leave the pit exhausted.
>>33072094
You seem to lack the basic knowledge about piloting jets senpai.
Please do some research before making shitty threads.
>>33072094
Flying in a combat scenario is an incredible feat both physically and mentally. If I put you in a plane asked you to add 7 and 9 while you pulled even 3G, you wouldn't be able to do it.
Who gets their gun information from a Japanese porn image board?
>>33071800
you should ask this question outside of a Japanese porn image board
>>33071818
Oh!
>porn
People who think this need to leave 4chan immediately
Don't make me do it /k/
Do it! XDDDD
>>33071603
Do it, but do it smartly. Use a pillow so your neighbors don't call the police and you'll be immortalized as a green text story.
>It's another OP baits for (you)s episode
I'm curious.
>>33071534
if we are going to talk about asian meme weapons then the only one I think looks worth it is the kusarigama
>>33071556
fuckin jap shit AGAIN, you realize there would be no fucking japan without china?
>>33071534
similar to nunchucks, a great way to whack yourself in the junk.
Seriously, this is only being funded because we already threw in so much money, we might just trow even more just for sport.
http://aviationweek.com/combat-aircraft/f-35-excels-destroying-targets-if-they-don-t-move
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/02/f-35c-getting-redesigned-wing-tips-that.html
I fucking hate retards like you, I really do. You're probably like 15 years old, so allow me to explain: this happens with EVERY. SINGLE. NEW PIECE OF EQUIPMENT.
Every single time the military starts developing something new, you always hear civvies and other assorted dipshits saying "hurrrrr what's wrong with da one we got!" or "durrrrrrr dat's too expensive! Muh taxes'll go up!"
No fucking new technology is perfect when it is introduced. The fucking P-51 Mustang had a shit ton of problems when it was introduced. Did they just scrap the whole thing and say "Ah, fuck it, it'll take too long to make it right."
No. You work on it and you fix the fucking problems with it so you can begin mass production. The F-35 of today is astronomically more improved than its predecessors. But retarded news outlets will cherry pick one weird instance where the sensors didn't work quite right, or there was an accident (remember the Osprey "hurrrr automatic Muhreen killer" meme?), or it didn't perform as well as the previous gen fighter (even though said previous gen is probably in like its 5th variant or some shit and has been refined over 40 years).
You're a fucking idiot. The F-35 is coming along just fine, when it's finished, it'll be one of the most sophisticated fighters in the air. There is simply an extent to how much retrofitting you can do on the previous generation of fighters before you just need a new damn airframe with a new sensor suite and new mechanics.
Fuck right off, retard. I don't even really give a shit about the F-35 but I'm tired of this stupid fucking meme. Half the people spouting it are just butthurt that the A-10 is facing retirement. Which it fucking should, considering it is good at doing basically one thing really well and that role is becoming more and more obsolete by the day. Or at least not necessary.
>>33071628
/thread
>>33071628
While I tend to not enjoy walls of text this is spot on. We could pull some fuckery with F18s for maybe another decade but then we are low end Europe tier for airforce if they half ass attempt development. Not to mention being outnumbered beyond technological superiority by the Chinese would be a bad place.
Will HUD's ever be a thing for infantry?
What about HUD's as depicted in the Halo Universe where it shows ammo count and where the weapon is pointing?
>>33071354
>anything expensive for infantry
>for 18 year old retards to break
>>33071354
Half the tech is already there. US infantry have to wear helmets and eyepro at all times. New HK 433 are using RFID chips that can record round counts (for armorers).
I imagine once guns start having unified power sources for accessories there could be a datalink to a projector for a HUD on their eyepro. They could even have a reticle with ballistic computation calculated for them. Most of this stuff aside from the new eyepro HUD projector is already cheap, small, and portable tech right now.
>>33071354
>hundred thousand dollar equipment for every individual soldier
>but anon what about the cannon fodder meme?
should soilders be given drugs that make then from getting boners
that way there would be no rape and don't ask don't tell won't even matter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u7OIQhGKrg
>>33071194
No what they need is proper discipline and punishment which in modern couintries already a thing
>>33071210
just imagine a bunch of dudes who haven't jerked off in 3 months being unleased on the enemy people would get fucked
>>33071238
if the punishment is bigger than the expected gain then it prevent most of the crimes
basic criminology
The Japanese only had horrible ta- 75mm's of frontal hull and turret armour, high velocity 75mm gun with 130-150mm of armour penetration (more than enough to take out a Tiger), 412 HP V12 diesel supercharged engine and all while only weighing 30 tons.
Pic related.
>early M4 Sherman had 90mm LOS glacis and nearly 140mm frontal turret armor including mantlet and rotor shield
>only managed to get 412 horsepower out of a V12 diesel versus 500 horsepower for the lighter T-34
>only two built, neither having seen combat
Nope. Still shit. Though the gun may have gone a long way towards making up for all that.
>>33071190
how many were made and saw service?
>>33071541
Two and none saw service.