the year of your birth
>>2176792
1492
>>2176792
2001 wasn't even that significant.
>muh 9/11
Will be considered a completely irrelevant event 100 years from now.
Why did jewish people come to be known as greedy?
>>2176607
Bankers
>>2176607
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnCCypIDJi8
We do enjoy nickle and diming. There was some shitty called don't mess with Zohan. That movie has pretty good depiction of Jewish businessmen.
People mark Justinian's reconquest as one of the catalysts for Rome's eventual downfall 100 years later. But, was it really? Wouldn't you say that the appointment of Justin II had a bigger effect on Rome than Justinian stretching the armies to thin? Futhermore would that even have mattered had Phocas not gone full retard?
>>2176437
Justinian's wars destroyed the illusion and compromise of the various barbarian kingdoms around the Mediterranean acting as Roman governors of a still existing Roman state. It wasn't about stretching his armies too thin, it was about making it clear that the barbarians couldn't be Rome because they were fighting for survival against Rome.
>>2176453
You're right, but it's not like those people were paying him taxes. Also, in the end, this might not have been a problem had Justin not been a shit.
Justin could have been a prodigy and that still wouldn't have repaired the damage. What was once Roman shipping and communications and correspondence darting across all sides of the Mediterranean was now either Byzantine or not. The plague ruined any chance to reverse this as well.
Although we make multiculturalism seem like a good thing it is terrible, it creates ghettos and separation. Napoleon winning would make things better. But also if Hitler was somehow able to fight off Russia, Britain, and America and it could have taken over and white washed the world (breaking alliances with Japs.) However would the slaughter of that many people (Jews, Blacks, JW's) be worth it? Probably
>>2176475
What's it like being 13 anon
>>2176409
Absolutely
Who was in the right?
Jefferson
>>2176408
Neither, both were traitors to the crown.
>>2176420
One Hundred percent get fucked forever. We win, and you lose. Your queen will also die shortly.
All right, I'm jazzed up. I have literally set down my deep study of the Declaration a moment ago in order to reply to this post, and reading and studying the thing incessantly, autistically, has caused me to really hate and distrust the British State and the British people more than ever before, and to appreciate that we won, and that I now enjoy my place in the world. God damn it it feels so fucking cool to not be in Mozambique, or London. MM MM MM MM delicious. MMMM.
In my study of the document, my single favorite thing is that we used the word Perfidy itself to refer to the British State. We named it, and then we beat it (at no personal cost, of course).
The principles of the declaration are correct, and for that reason, your absurdity. Because we say. It was the crown that was the traitor. Trump not Hillary OK. I actually believe my own convenient jingoism just now and it feels so fucking good MM MM MM MM <3!! ~*
But for all that, I still want to congratulate Dad on Brexit. we live in the good parallel universe.
How well was "Don't kill the messenger" respected in history?
I know of the absolute madmen in the Khwarezmian, but how many more people have been retarded?
>>2176407
yes
How reliable is John Green's Crash Course content? Specifically his World History series
>>2176353
not at all
>>2176353
every fucking day with these threads holy fuck stop
>>2176353
Fuck this guy
Husbandos now
Your husbando has syphilis
Him desu.
>>2176335
THIS
H
I
S
How do I reach Poseidon mode?
>>2176206
Tell me anon, what exactly does "Poseidon Mode" entail?
go in the sea and hold your breath for 7 hours
>>2176268
A godlike physique and the ability to fuck as much as Zeus
Oswald Spengler
Substitute religion
>>2176073
How'd you get a pic of girlfriend, anon?
>>2176073
An excuse to get high and have orgies.
Also because mainstream religions are too mainstream, man.
What country made up the bulk of the varangian guard during 9th-10th century. Were the rus people at that time scandinavian or slavic?
Combination of both.
>>2176019
First most of them were Scandinavians, but later on a lot of britbongistanis replaced them. Some Anglo-Saxon lords had varangian service in their cvs etc.
Check Blondals Varangian Guard book for more memes.
Is there any way to tell which scandinavian country had the largest part of the varangian guard?
>Nothing was ever created by two men. There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in mathematics, in philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extend it, but the group never invents anything. The preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man.
Can you think os historical exceptions to this "rule"?
>>2175958
The Copenhagen Interpretation.
>>2175958
why were these ferdinands not friends?
hello?
FUCK NIGGERS
>Friends Ferdinand
Prove to me why Christian-Anarchism isn't the solution for world.
>Protip:you can't
>Like Gandhi, who was his equally famous disciple, Tolstoy came to his anarchism by way of a mid-life crisis. For when he was around 50 Tolstoy began to seriously question the meaning of his life. The outcome was a series of books in which Tolstoy began to formulate his anarchist ideas, drawing on some of his earlier experiences — the trauma he experienced in Paris in 1857 when he witnessed with repulsion a public execution, his meeting and discussions with Proudhon in 1861, and the realisation he gained from a serious study of the Bible that the basic teachings of Jesus were absolutely opposed to violence of any kind. The books were My Confession (1881), What I Believe (1884) and What Then Must We Do? (1886). In 1894 Tolstoy published his major work on Christian anarchism The Kingdom of God Is Within You and for the rest of his life continued to write letters, essays and tracts on anarchism. But it is worth noting that because of the association of anarchism with violence and bomb-throwing Tolstoy never in fact came to describe himself as an anarchist. In recent years several anthologies of these writings have been published, the most useful being the collection Government is Violence essays on anarchism and pacifism, edited by David Stephens (1991).
If you enjoy Leo than you would probably enjoy Chomsky. Both men take the high road in their hearts.
>>2175890
>christian anarchism
What the actual fuck.
Which part of the KINGDOM of God don't you understand? What part of DIVINE RIGHT to rule don't you get?
Christianity is about monarchy and aristocracy, about shepherds and herds, very much about hierarchy and rule of the wise over the foolish.
Where did it all go wrong?
>>2175858
After Rome fell
>>2175858
Balkanized pasta was good, until frogs and wieners wanted to conquer them, and thus threatened, they united to become Ital, the destroyer of relevance
>>2175858
1494