Is legalizing prostitution morally acceptable? A week ago I had an argument with some people about this and for me it is not acceptable that people can fuck bitches legally. What about you /his/ what do you think?
>>2245676
I think it's commendable for you to take such a strong stance on protection and compassion for "bitches."
Anti-prostitution works for no one.
Pro-prostitution works for everyone.
>>2245684
I want to protect the customers and families, who cares about the bitches.
'member when the history channel was about history and not alien conspiracies and red necks hurting themselves?
'Member when national geographic magazines were about national geography and not transexual children?
'Member when the national geographic channel wasn't about drugs, gangs, and prisons?
'Member when the Discovery channel was about discovering new things and not people in Alaska doing fuck all to pass the time?
'Member when animal planet was about animals and not degenerates making fish tanks for rich people, old men building treehouses, and conspiracy nuts looking for Bigfoot?
I 'member...
'Member when south park was good?
Neither do I.
4chan was cool when we were all in high school listening to Linkin park..
(Somebody please post this pasta)
Transsexual children are a legitimate topic for National Geographic. Anthropology isn't just going to Borneo to look at savages like they're zoo animals.
What are the theology books to start with?
>>2245605
Institutes of the Christian Religion by John Calvin
>>2245605
>an entire field studying something that literally does not exist
you can't make this shit up.
How much time, money and resources were wasted in pursuit of the Holocaust, that could have went towards the German war effort?
And would it be significant enough to alter the outcome of WW2 for Germany?
>>2245500
It was only a matter of time once the USA entered the war.
>>2245500
>How much time, money and resources were wasted in pursuit of the Holocaust
Zero.
>>2245500
In all honesty their genocidal policies probably saved them money, due to the massive amount of slave labor they utilized and all the food freed up by starving most of the population.
If China had not been taken over by the Communist Party, would they have been able to achieve the same kind of success in development and quality of life as non-Communist Chinese places elsewhere such as Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore; or non-Chinese East Asian countries like Korea and Japan?
Or was China simply too big and backwards for anybody to modernize in only a few decades, and we would have a similar situation as today anyway with pollution everywhere and extreme inequality?
It would probably end up as a Brazil/India equivalent in form, with less GDP growth than today's China but relatively more individual liberties (on paper). The problem is that there are just so many Chinese to care for/give voice to, so there would be massive bureaucratic failures with any less centralization than what it has now. Poor rural people still getting screwed, Coastal/inland divide like the US's North/South divide, etc.
Thinking about it now, though, the very worst thing that could have happened would be for businesses to buy up Chinese rural land for farming like how they did in other countries. China's population is so large that one major environmental disaster on a river could affect tens of millions of people. It's hard to believe that China will ever have a truly effective regulatory system without authoritarian practices.
Perhaps not having Mao around to do stupid shit like encourage farmers to make steel in their backyards would have helped, but mainly China is behind because they have way too fucking much population.
>>2245540
It's worth pointing out the KMT wanted a strong authoritarian single party state too, which is pretty much what they had in Taiwan for many decades.
The reason why the nationalists failed is because of its own incompetence and corruption. And you ask if china will get better under their rule?
Do you think Native American nationalist movements and self determination ever gain ground? Do you think it would ever be possible for an Independent Native nation to exist in North America in the future? I think it's best chances would be in Canada.
>>2245494
>Do you think it would ever be possible for an Independent Native nation to exist in North America in the future? I think it's best chances would be in Canada.
wwwwwwwwwwwwwww
no
>>2245498
I'd like a discussion pls.
>"“The first element is, of course, the fact that birth rates in the Aboriginal population are somewhat higher than the rest of the Canadian population,” Maxim told CTV News Channel. “That doesn’t account for the substantial increase, however. The big increase is due to what we call definitional things. People are basically identifying more and more as Aboriginal.”"
Higher birth rate means we'll see more representation for this group of people in political life in the near future, and more of an identity.
doesnt > mean less than, so the graphic saying >50% native means less than 50% of that areas pop is native?
Austria-Hungary rightly gets mocked for its incompetence in WW1, but are they actually underrated? Specifically I usually see people mocking them for WW2 Italy-tier incompetence based mostly on their performance in the first twelve or so months, most notably the Serbian Campaign, Battle of Galicia, and three consecutive Carpathian Offensives. This seems too drastic to be warranted. When put under better (read: German) leadership they could be capable foes. Ignoring Italy: on the Eastern Front alone, they:
>were the primary Central Powers presence for most of the war
>made up 46% of the forces involved in the initial blitz of Romania vs Germany's 22%, where they took 50,000 prisoners for the loss of only 5,500 casualties
>outnumbered the German force when they both executed the wildly successful Gorlice-Tarnow Offensive
>utterly steamrolled the Russians alongside the Germans during the Great Retreat, taking 194,000 prisoners in July alone
>overall took 1,269,000 Russian troops prisoner
>assuming the other casualties they inflicted were proportionate to the POW numbers, inflicted overall ~3.55 million casualties on the Russians, meaning they roughly broke even on the casualty ratio
They also won some battles on that front entirely on their own without even German leadership, such as Limanowa and Przezmysl (first siege).
>>2245421
>They also won some battles on that front entirely on their own without even German leadership
This really doesn't speak well for Austria, that they need Germany to succeed at all. That said, Gorlice-Tarnow, Romania were the highpoints of the Eastern Front for them. That said, you have to remember that they were fighting a THREE-front war for four years, which is even more impressive if you think about it.
>>2245437
Two of those fronts were shared with the germans, tho. That's half a front each, one front.
as for the italian front, not even worth mentioning. Austria-hungary, yeah we make fun of em, but it's simply insulting to compare them to italians.
>>2245451
>not even worth mentioning
The War in the Dolomites was fucking incredible, anon. Have you ever been there?
And I don't recall much German support on the Salonika front either.
So /his/, what is your opinion on the central civilization theory where humans were once ridiculously advanced 12,000+ years ago, but had to disperse and become primitive again due to a cataclysmic event that made us a "species in amnesia"?
Why do we have to have this thread every day?
>>2245384
Is there any documented or forensic evidence supporting this theory?
>>2245405
ever heard of Atlantis?
>This is the difficulty Aquinas faced when addressing the existence of incubus demons. Although it was a necessary condition of their spiritual natures that demons could not generate human offspring, Thomas recognized that both authority and common experience reported otherwise. To reconcile this apparent contradiction, he constructed an elaborate and unconvincing scenario in which succubi received semen from their human partners and then used this as incubi to inseminate women. Normally, of course, human semen lost its calor naturalis, and hence its potency, when removed from the body, but the superhuman speed of demonic motion was sufficient to overcome even this obstacle. But if this provided a satisfactory explanation for how demons seemed able to generate human offspring, it did not really explain why they should want to do so in the first place. For unlike Guibert of Nogent’s demons, who sought intercourse with women for “sport alone,” the demons of the Summa take no delight in carnal sins and looked only to lead men into perdition.
>yfw demons are human offspring
Post yfw this means you're not a virgin
>>2245383
So wait, does this mean someone having sex with a succubus is basically teleporting their sperm into someone having sex with an incubus, like the succubi/incubi is a medium for long distance intercourse?
How can a man who grew up in 17th century repressed religious community be so right about everything?
All Nietzsche did was take his concepts and make them sound more masculine.
>>2245378
>jew
>atheist
>good
>>2246426
Such as?
so is European nationalism/white nationalism, historically retarded then?
White Skin is only 8000 years old
WE
GYPSY
>found in a cave in the Carpathian mountains of Romania
Yeah that's about right Romania is still basically africa
Why is he so smug? You can see it in his eyes.
cause he was a cunt
we both know Protestant Aesthetics are shit tier when it comes to Catholic Aesthetics
Deus VULT!!
>>2245272
He was possessed by the devil.
Cause he was right.
Only dum dums complain about arrogance
Fuck them!
The way they conquered, enslaved, subjugated and treated other European peoples reminds me of the Nazis
>>2245212
>Nazis were bad
>>2245212
>reminds me of the Nazis
You don't say?
>>2245212
it was a doggie dog back then
the celts tried to do the same to the romans and nearly succeeded
Whose fault is it that Arabia was conquered by the Saud family?
Can the blame be traced back to Lawrence and his actions during WW1?
Would the country be better off if it had been conquered by a different family, had been established as a democracy, or remained unconquered?
It would have been better if it had been glassed.
>>2245117
The Anglos are 100% to blame. They could have helped a more secular faction come into power but had to have picked the crazy wahhibists.
>>2245117
What happens if the family of said loses power? They're huge.
Was going to war with Germany a mistake?
>>2244992
...For who?
>>2244994
USA
>>2245002
Germany declared war on the US, not the other way around.