Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1321. page

>>8408065
Who actually says this?

>>8408066
Trolls. They tricked me into thinking I wouldn't have to study for my first exam and I ended up failing. Never again

>american
>""""""""education""""""""

>>8401083
I know absolutely nothing about probability but i'm gonna guess it's 75

>Stupid Question Thread as the last one reached comment limit.

no it didnt

>>8401083
65 at a guess

File: tumblr_inline_nf5qqsaOnZ1ripgeb.gif (2MB, 245x227px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x227px

I've found applications that describe central tendency and compression that I want to talk about. The algorithm produces something that I can use to describe the list other than the order.

I don't know how to mathematically formalize the algorithm.

I'm also an undergraduate with no intention of going to graduate school but I want to tell someone about what I've discovered. I would gladly just tell this board the procedure but I'm not sure if that's the best idea.

File: IMG_4156.jpg (1MB, 2399x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2399x1920px

>>8405952
You sure you didn't just reinvent radix sort?

Just go talk to one of your professors

It adds flavor to the pasta and makes the pasta softer.

> Not making your own truffle infused water to boil your freshly made pasta in, and making a nice mozzarella or burrata foam to top it off.

Molecular gastronomy or gtfo

Sorry dad

>>8404800
We can't and that's depressing.

>>8404800
We can't and that makes it philosophizing. Not shit talking Philosophy but this isn't science. It's at best science fiction.

>>8404806
What's even more depressing is that it doesn't make a difference either way

>>8402361
I am planning on trying it yes. The problem is I'll have no way of knowing if it's just placebo and also my personal experience would still be anecdotal.

>>8402353
>Is nofap a meme?

Definitely, unless you want to be a low testosterone male feminist cuck.

Masturbation increases testosterone, which then increases your intelligence and physical fitness.

>>8402373
Can you please stop shitposting here anon

>>8395440
Those lucky bastard scientists, why can't I have some dumbass billionaire off to give me money for literally making up shit

>>8395440
Some goofy comments made while drunk in a hot tub, coupled with a deliberate misunderstanding of what "Holographic Universe" theory is actually about, leading people to believe billionaires are even crazier than they already are - all because it makes good click bait.

File: tim face.jpg (10KB, 247x247px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 247x247px

>independant
case dismissed

File: 1476077209427.jpg (493KB, 680x955px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 680x955px

>be member of the CS master race
>take course "programming for mathematicians" just for lulz
>the people struggle with simple concepts like for loop

Brainlets, when will they learn?

>>8404468
>From a purely mathematical viewpoint, the Dirac delta is not strictly a function, because any extended-real function that is equal to zero everywhere but a single point must have total integral zero.[5][6] The delta function only makes sense as a mathematical object when it appears inside an integral. From this perspective the Dirac delta can usually be manipulated as though it were a function. The formal rules obeyed by this "function" are part of the operational calculus, a standard tool kit of physics and engineering. The operational calculus, and in particular the delta function, was viewed with suspicion by mathematicians of the early 20th century, until a satisfactory rigorous theory was introduced by Laurent Schwartz in the 1950s.[7] Formally, the delta function must be defined as the distribution that corresponds to a probability measure supported at the origin. In many applications, the Dirac delta is regarded as a kind of limit (a weak limit) of a sequence of functions having a tall spike at the origin. The approximating functions of the sequence are thus "approximate" or "nascent" delta functions.

is that so hard? really? because the delta dirac function is far more useful than your shit-tier autism.

File: 1475807188218.jpg (1MB, 1154x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1154x1500px

>>8404468
>tfw to intelligent for Delta functions

>>8402207

mechanical engineering

or an applied physics degree

Electrical.

You can do software stuff, you can do hardware stuff, and you can do MechE stuff.

>>8402207
Electrical engineering with focus on applied mathematics. You can go software or hardware or physics or finance or ....

File: Capture.png (19KB, 234x191px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 234x191px

>>8400263

>>8400263
Yes, it's trivial. Pick up a textbook and learn basic geometry.

File: chord.png (34KB, 634x586px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 634x586px

>>8400269
>>8400268

warmed up? good.

what can you tell about a chord of a circle?
prove what you tell.

/sci/ confirmed brainlets LARPing as intellectuals

brainlet /sci/ can't answer my question, Kek

There are many ways.

If you can't figure it out yourself, you are no better than the "brainlets" at sci.

brainlet detected

>>8403080
Anyone can imagine some fantasy shit that will never proven right in your lifetime. Working on practical solutions is a million times more difficult.

Scum like you is the reason we will only fuel science fiction bullshit instead of improving things in our lifetime.

>>8403086
Remind me, how many papers have you published? What exactly is your experience in research that has caused you to form this opinion? Do you even have an undergraduate degree?

>I can't into infinity
Poor b8

[math] \displaystyle
1 = \frac {3}{3} = 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333... = 0.999...
[/math]

[math] \displaystyle
3 \cdot 0.\overline{3} = 0.\overline{9} = 0.1_3 + 0.1_3 + 0.1_3 = 1_3 = 1
[/math]

>>8398251
Who cares? Even if we don't have it, or do have it, we have the illusion of it.

>>8398251
it depends on how you define free will

File: 0034.png (197KB, 394x529px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 394x529px

>>8398251
>categorically
>equivocally
>beyond any doubt

>>8398000
We don't know.

>>8398019
Can you elaborate?

>>8398031
I don't know