>>8400563
x=x+1
x+1=x
(x+1)-1=x-1
x=x-1
>>8400563
[math]\{x \in \mathbb{C} \ | \ x = x + 1\} = \emptyset[/math]
x=x+1 (mod 1)
NUCLEAR FUCKING FUSION
THIS MUST BE BUILT IF THE HUMAN RACE IS TO SURVIVE
STEINS GATE HAS SHOWN ME
BUILD IT, AND WE WILL LIVE
Build it, and we all will have it all, forever.
Now I'm gonna bump this with girls to get as many eyes, human, robot, code, ayylamo, or whatever, to see it!
Also Griffith did nothing wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIoILN_KrhU
JUST FUCKING BUILD IT
What do we think of this guy?
>>8405681
His cars are nVidia tier trash.
>>8405691
t. AMD cuck
>>8405692
Nah. Enjoy your Lithium burns.
Why are the nobel awards such a boys only club?
Why don't feminists crack down on HRC talking about the importance of women's rights while taking money from Saudi and Qatari royals through he foundation?
>>8410175
Tbqh the only reason is probability.
Out of all the contestants I bet like 90% were men and because all of their achievements are comparable in greatness, they all could have won. It is about who gets lucky with the paper that makes the commitee cum the hardest.
Women only had a 10% chance and didn't win. Better luck rolling the dice next year.
Btw I am not trolling. This is literally the only reason.
>>8410175
Because only men do things that are relevant to stem
For every single competent woman in stem there are like 20 other equally competent men
Outside of the stem nobel prizes fuck if I know
Didn't they give last year's peace award to some Muslim teenage girl whos only accomplishment was getting her face scarred or something?
>Science begins with western modernity so it must do away with
>African way of thinking about science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=45&v=C9SiRNibD14
WTF am i watching
liberal arts in a nutshell
2:51 yeah cause thats what happen, Newton just randomly came up with a formulation for gravity willy nilly
>>8412027
more like stupidity in a nutshell
Why do universities still have BA faculties?
Please watch: (It is about science)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14
>>8410481
there's already another thread on the front page
I'm assuming this video was posted on /pol/ and now it's being posted here as a result?
>>8410494
Really? No, I'm an engineering student in South Africa and have not been able to attend university for the last 3 weeks due to these idiots so I thought I'd let the world know about it.
>>8410508
I hope they know if they get their wish, it'll simply mean the end of university level education in South Africa, as it will no longer be financially viable. A more realistic goal would be to decrease tuition fees, simply removing them is a socialist pipe-dream.
I've been trying to understand what Hawking Radiation is, but every single explanation I have found either is an analogy that seems to just explain a different analogy or a jumble of math. I get that this isn't something that can be explained in layman's terms, but can someone give me a rough idea of it that makes sense without taking years of physics classes?
>>8408768
Empty space isn't really empty. Random pairs of particles pop into existence and then annihilate each other. When a pair of these particles comes into existence right at the border of a black holes event horizon the particle within the black hole can't escape it's gravity. The other particle is able to escape and the black hole thus loses energy.
>>8408768
A virtual particle is a spontaneous generation of energy from the vacuum.
They don't exist long and usually occur in pairs.
Near the event horizon, the pair exists longer than normal, and there's a chance that half of the pair can escape the horizon.
Since its a virtual particle, it is theorized that it can escape the black hole even though it has mass.
Anyone here think this is terrible idea?
In your expert opinion, what is the problem with it?
btw think about how grate the pad explosion is gonna be.
>>8407367
>what is the problem with it?
each engine adds to the probability of failure
it has a shitload of enignes
>>8408524
This engine configuration will work fine.
Does /sci/ like carl?
He was a crank
>Reddits le hero xD IFLS!!!
But other than that yeah hes pretty cool I guess.
One of my favorite scientists. He was cool as fuck. We've lost a lot if great minds to cancer.
Archimedes, Newton, Gauss, Euler, Banneker
i feel like Banneker should be included
agree or disagree
there are many more people that deserve to be that "5th" than Banneker, i applaud him for being a great mind, self taught at a time of racism...but he is not a All Time Great mathematician
>>8409236
don't forget George Washing Carver
>>8409236
Benneker was a man before his time, a unique character, and a based nigger all around. I vote to include him.
What's the biggest outburst you've seen a professor give? I've never seen an instructor in college yell but ironically when I was in elementary school our second grade teacher screamed really loud at the class because we were all fucking around and making a big mess. We were only about 8 years old. He got fired that day and the next day we had a new teacher. I've been thinking about what being a professor of calculus at a small city college is going to be like and I'm really set on a very clear and patient teaching style with the occasional joke.
My professor farted one time lol
>>8402869
The one that taught 4000-level stats would go on twenty-minute rants about whatever he felt like complaining about (soccer, Americans, students, Star Trek, Americans, and so on). The guy was a walking caricature.
>>8402869
i remember this one black math teacher i had in 2 or 3 grade who told this kid to stfu really loud a couple times
How is it possible that a vibrating mess of atoms becomes conscious?
Personally I find the simplest explanation is that humans and other creatures are not really conscious, but merely emulate the behaviors a conscious thing would have.
>>8388160
then how do you explain our conscious inner life and subjective experience? also how do you explain qualia?
>>8388180
>then how do you explain our conscious inner life and subjective experience? also how do you explain qualia?
Mere illusions. People report these things since that's what conscious entities would do. But it's merely an act; a presentation.
So why do people emulate these behaviors?
Basically because being conscious would offer serious survival benefits, so evolution should have converged our behavior on that of a conscious entity. But, being atoms, we're fundamentally incapable of actually being conscious entities. But emulating conscious behaviors is sufficient to get the survival benefits, and is possible given the constraints of our form, thus this is what we converged on.
Will solar and wind solve all our energy problem?
>>8408424
no.
nuclear power can
>>8408424
Our energy problems are unsolvable, since we'll never overcome scarcity.
What does sci think of Numberphile?
>1+2+3+4.....= -1/12
Primes are like weed to him.
sweaty autist who thinks he can do math
>>8399294
meme science. I hate it.
Why does everyone shit-talk this book?
>>8403634
Because it doesn't teach you calculus
>>8403634
Because they failed calculus and blame it on the book by whining about how an introductory textbook for highschoolers isn't rigorous or abstract enough.
because they were the fedora tipper sitting in the back reading the spivak book and failing all the exams.