Why did the gommies bully Somalia?
1. they where freinds with China
2. they started it
>supply ethiopia and somalia with arms to make them gommie aligned
>somalia invades ethiopia
Did the British fall for the trap?
>>1471934
>Making all the german aligned ducks happy
Kek
The only trap Britain fell for was resisting Germany. If they only surrendered like France did they might've managed to keep their empire once the Americans liberated them.
Hey /his/, i was wondering from where does the estereotype of romans becoming hedonists and generally morally bankrupt during the decline of the empires comes from, considering most romans became pius,no fun allowed christians?
>>1471931
Its mostly just a meme as far as it getting worse as they declined. The romans had a wierd sort of contrast all through their history of decadence and stoicism
The decadence was during the fall of the Republic and beginning of the Empire. The Empire was completely degenerate until Christendom.
>>1471944
So they were degenerate at their peak then?.Good to know.
>After that kingdom has fallen, yet a third kingdom, represented by bronze, will rise to rule the world.
Why do people think that this prophesied the Romans?
>Rome
>A kingdom
And the Etruscan rule prior to the republic obviously doesn't count in this context.
>>1471927
Confirmation bias?
I mean I dunno, >prophesy, fucking lol.
>>1471927
Did Biblical Hebrew even have words for concepts like "republic", or any alternative form of government? I mean hell, I know that they use the word for "slave" to describe pretty much any sort of economic relationship where someone is in charge, and not just open chattel slavery.
>tfw classical liberalism has yet to ever be proven wrong or irrational
How can one philosophy be so based?
>>1471925
The only problem with classical liberalism is most people are too authoritarian to accept it
>believing in free market
fucking kek
>>1471925
You mean Third Position has never been wrong, right?
BOSNIA DID NOTHING WRONG
>>1471875
that's a weird way to spell Serbia, ahmed
If heaven is real does it have dead aliens?
>>1471866
Doubtful.
No, animals are not gifted with souls, reason, and free will; therefore aliens cease to exist upon death.
There may be some aliens in heaven but only for the glory of Yahweh. Only humans get an afterlife because humans are the pinnacle of creation. It has nothing to do with my personal fear of death.
>>1471896
Man that sucks for the majestic galaxy spanning alien empires that all their own esoteric faiths are actually wrong and actually some tiny fraction of the apes on some backwater planet can go to heaven.
https://join.skype.com/ggb5qcs3GIct
>join skype
Is this some kind of ERP thing
https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/ape-man/gorilla-human-split-family-tree/
https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/hominids/did-ardi-head-up-human-evolution-before-lucy/
It's funny that they say they're unbiased, yet they skew the facts more than anyone else.
*tips fedora*
>>1471765
Why do Jews put rocks on dead people?
>>1471749
I don't think it's ever been definitevely traced back to a single origin. It's definitely not in the torah anywhere, it's some sort of custom that gained widespread acceptance. I've heard a number of theories, but no real support for any of them, including obvious marker so the priest caste could stay away (they're not supposed to go near dead bodies), remembrance for the Temple that got sacked, or that it's a more permanent grave marker than flowers, or that placing flowers is the custom of non-Jews, so Jews should do something different.
Take your pick, I guess.
>>1471749
Because God commanded them to stone the wicked, but he didn't say they had to be stoned before they were dead, so this is how they get around it.
>>1471780
Solid post
When will people on the internet and on 4chan realize that insulting people doesn't make their own point valid, but rather shows that they are upset and going to childish tactics to try and win an argument?
When will people start seeing that people try to confuse the majority of people on the internet with big words, while twisting sentences to make them sound smarter, make others be like "oo I never thought of it that way lemme listen to this anon", because they bring in their point by confusing them with a lot of words, rather than being easy and straightforward.
Also, why do non-Christians get all defensive on who is a heretic or not? Why do non-Christians make attempts to tell Christians how to "properly interpret " scripture? It is like any Christian who has free thought and combines their ideas with science are shut down by people who aren't Christian but "defend" the "historical Christianity" even though the only Christianity is the one that started with the Christ.
I have yet to see a single case of a debate where someone managed to changed the views of his opponent. It literally never fucking happened.
>>1471746
EXACTLY
I just need to credit the wisdom in your post for a second.... Thank you
Seriously, no one ever changes their ideas or even considers the other sides, and literally they only have more fuel for the fight, and each side is more "right" when they leave an argument because they just hold their belief even stronger than they did before they got online.
>>1471758
In real life too, not just online. I've came to the conclusion that debates are largely useless.
Can we all agree on the fact that, despite getting completely BTFO due to war and disease, the Mesoamericans, specifically the Aztec and Mayans, had some of the most interesting civilizations of the ancient world?
>You'll never see how trials were resolved in the Aztec imperial court
just end this suffering
Yes.
Tenochtitlan sounds like something out of a fantasy novel, even compared to cities we have today. The fact it got destroyed and the modern day shithole mexico city is LITERALLY just built on top of the remains ranks up there with the burning of the library of Alexandria as one of the biggest historical losses in human history if you ask me.
Also, OP, most of the reason they lost to the spainjish was existing socio-political conditions of the region, Montezuma II's poor decision making, diseases, and dumb luck on the Spainish's part for having Malinche.
>>1471704
>Can we all agree on the fact that, despite getting completely BTFO due to war and disease, the Mesoamericans, specifically the Aztec and Mayans, had some of the most interesting civilizations of the ancient world?
No. I would say cultures who created things that even today we have no idea how they did it.
you have 10 seconds to name a bigger meme philosopher
Plato
>>1471688
Sam Harris
>>1471701
no one knows who that is, while everyone knows who gnome chumpsky is
Have you ever heard of the ancien Lechina Empire? If yes then what have you heard?
Here in Poland we basically start our history in 966 from the baptism.But i stumbled upon some sources pointing out that this isn't quite true. The supposed leaders of that state on the pic.
the map here
>>1471615
So the Poles wuz emperors n shit?
>>1471606
>some sources
How did Iran resist arabization in culture/language when most other places conquered by Muslim Arabs - including places with histories and cultures just as old like Egypt and Mesopotamia - did not
>>1471590
Whar are assyrians , copts(true egyptians), and phenicians(lebanese christian) ?
>>1471599
>copts(true egyptians)
>
>phenicians(lebanese christian)
>
as for assyrians, they are irrelevant
50% - Iranians speak an Indo-European language that made for a much harder transition to a semitic language like Arabic. People in Egypt and Mesopotamia already spoke semitic languages that weren't far-off from Arabic.
40% - Iran had native dynasties sprout up soon enough to patronize persian-language arts and scholars, keeping the language relevant.
10% - Some degree of Persian exceptionalism. Egypt was long past its heyday and mesopotamia had been an irrelevant boxing ring for Perso-Roman conflict for centuries. Persians still had a lot of spunk left in them