Recently I've had the opportunity to adjunct a 200-level history course at a local community college, as part of my work for PhD.
It's a fairly general course on a moderately restricted topic within Western history. In no way is it primarily focused on military history. Yet every week I'm faced with the same gaggle of sperglords, front and center, raring to derail my lecture in order to bloviate about the lives and minds of mildly obscure military figures such as Erwin Rommel. They all subordinate to a similar 'great man' model of history, which while not objectively wrong is startling in its ubiquity. Reading their papers, I'm starting to think that some of them are Nazi sympathizers, not because of any strong intellectual identification with Nazi philosophy, but simply because of their obsession with historical militaria.
It goes without saying that these individuals are not very bright, it's a community college after all. Still, I think that some of them genuinely desire at least a four-year degree at a standard college. I should also note that some of them have real, admirable eagerness at the study of history, for all their foibles. I'm curious about two things: A. Is it appropriate for me to indicate to them that, at some (if not most) four-year institutions, this sort of behavior and scholarship is frowned upon? B. Has anyone else experienced this sort of thing?
Deride them as amateurs for not mentioning logistics
>>1877106
>A. Is it appropriate for me to indicate to them that, at some (if not most) four-year institutions, this sort of behavior and scholarship is frowned upon?
If they're interested in such, yes.
> B. Has anyone else experienced this sort of thing?
Oh god yes. I'm heavily involved in a waragaming magazine, so I probably have a greater than normal contact with such folks, but yes, they exist. You've only seen the tip of the iceberg if it's only some crappy great man papers. Every month I have at least half a dozen people arguing that some game or another needs "correction" because they read some crackpot alt-his theory somewhere, usually based in bizarre assumptions about how if this one course of action was taken, literally everything ever would go right, because that happens in military operations. I've literally received threats because I tell them that no, we don't plan on running their proposed articles because we don't want to bombard our viewers with nonsense.
Less on the WW2 focus though, but again, I have something of an eclectic audience.
I'm interested in your stories though, if you care to share any.
>>1877135
>I'm heavily involved in a wargaming magazine
Which one?
Hello /his/, I'm the head of the psychology club at my university. We are doing some things in the spirit of Halloween, including making a booklet of spooky/creepy unethical experiments for people to peruse through at a tabling event(a paragraph or two of description and a picture). I was wondering if any of you historians had any unsettling and interesting experiments in mind that would be appropriate to add to our booklet.
I've got ones like Tuskegee, Nazi experiments, Zimbardo, etc., was looking for some that might not be as well known.
>>1871644
It was quite unsettling senpai
Fugg off you psycho were not giving you any ideas for your torture dungeon
Unit 731 springs to mind.
What went wrong? Why was this allowed?
Nixon and Reagan.
>>1866636
>muh free shit
*argument blurted out in a few words because i want my argument to be at the top of the thread but explaining it in depth will take to long*
It is an honor to be thought a well educated man, for are we not a nation of erudite warriors? But i tell you, that in all the books i have ever studied, i have never seen an account of creatures as lowly as our foes! However, my learning leads me to suspect that they may die as easily as other men.
These rebellious knaves and villains are not fit to breathe the same air as we honest men. They must all die before dawn comes again. This is a mercy, because they richly deserve the gallows for turning against their betters.
>>1888558
>general has "mad" trait
>gives horse shit speeches
>>1888558
How much of a retard can you be?
>>1888563
YOU ARE ALL LIKE TURNIP! READY TO...GROW... INTO GREAT AND...MIGHTY TURNIP...WARRIORS! SO EMBRACE YOUR DATE AND...uh, KILL THE ENEMY! WHO ARE NOT TURNIP!...thank you!
How beautiful could Europe be today if WWII hadn't happened?
>>1881667
It would be much better and places like Dresden (pls no bully) and other European cities devastated by the war wouldn't have shit modern architecture
The Swedes went and ruined Stockholm without any war
Stalingrad was pretty nice before the eternal kraut decided to chimp out on it
>Daily reminder that it was a muslim warrior that taught Euroshits the meaning of chivalry
>>1881375
>hurr durr I just watched the full cut of 'Kingdom of Heaven'
>what a gr8 film
>what an accurate depiction of the crusades
>islam is just misunderstood
>c03X1$t
>>1881375
And yet somehow mudslimes became irrelevant for a millennium shortly after
What actually caused the massive shift to the left seen in the last few years? Especially with millennials.
>>1891686
Idk, but, there seems to be alot of them on this board.
>"He who is not a républicain at twenty compels one to doubt the generosity of his heart; but he who, after thirty, persists, compels one to doubt the soundness of his mind."
- attributed to Edmund Burke, 1875
>>1891686
George Bush being shit
>And he said to them, "I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God come with power.
>>1888744
well Jesus was standing there right? he's still alive in heaven. checkmate atheists!
>>1888744
Keep reading. They thought John was going to live forever. There's a reason for that.
Jesus must have been looking at John when he said it.
And John saw Jesus coming down from heaven in glory before he died, and wrote of the experience in the Revelation.
Some neither precludes all nor one.
>>1888744
Matthew 16:28
>28 Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Three of those standing there were Peter, James, and John
The next verses, Matthew 17:1-2:
>1 Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James, and John his brother, led them up on a high mountain by themselves; 2 and He was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and His clothes became as white as the light.
This is called the Transfiguration. This is what 16:28 referred to.
why does it keep on failing /his/torians?
it doesn't benefit globalized capitalism so globalist capitalist powers fuck with it as much as possible until it crumbles.
also, communism literally works until NK crumbles, you can't say otherwise without being objectively wrong.
>j-juche isn't communism!!1!
no, it just isn't your specific idea of what communism is. weighted benefits towards those that reinforce the system + international trade conducted by the ruling party are adaptations that made it so NK didn't crumble.
Because humans, every goddamn time.
One day, the machines, with their superior intellect and infinitely better grasp of resource prioritization, will show how it's done. (Those still alive, if any, that is.)
Because (((capitalists))) actively destroying it.
What topics in history would /his/ say are understudied?
>>1882908
General Erwin Rommel
>master tactician
>easy on the eyes
>logistics wizard
>normies HATE him
The Barbary Wars.
Literally Americans vs Muslims in the 19th Century.
More reading: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_Wars
>>1882908
Why Montgomery was so awful. British historians hype the mong up so much. His stratagem was outdated and costly.
What are some interesting historical facts about Bulgaria? It seems like a rather irrelevant yet curious place.
bulgarians came from the volga region
also cyrillic script was invented there
>>1882691
Over a million people and a significant percentage of their population have moved to countries like America. I should know since my neighbors are Bulgarian
The original bulgarians were a bunch of turkics who raped the original population, but decided to adopt slavic language anyway.
Was the war of northern aggression the most unjust war of all time?
probably...
You mean the war of southern autism?
>>1877539
It was terrible..
What exactly is sharia law?
religious law, not sure how much codified
>>1884714
AY YO HOl UP WHITE BOI
It's martial law.
Why did the yanks insist on starting the war of northern aggression, even though the south seceded democratically?
>>1884428
The north was fired upon, after they refused to surrender their property.
Really makes you think
Yanks didn't like how us true Americans democratically shelled fort Sumter
>>1884428
Lincoln was determined not to let the country split, hence the suspending of habeus corpus, etc. Slavery has been a poison in North America for a long, long, long time, and continues to poison the well today.
Hey guys, so I'm a wonderful product of the American education system and I was wondering how historically accurate depictions of vikings as horrible brutalistic barbarians are? I mean, for example when you look at one of the biggest contemporary depictions of the Norsemen in media, the TV show Vikings, they're portrayed as these horrible barbarians that just slaughtered unarmed men, women, and children with a few shinning examples going against the grain, I highly doubt that a people that pioneered ship building in Europe and were the first from Europe to reach as far as Greenland and North America were these unrelenting savages. Were there different phases where once they reached the British Isles, etc, that they shaped up and became more "respectable"? I imagine a few posts can't sum it up very well but a TL;DR and if you guys have any suggested literature or other materials that someone looking for an accurate non-politicized version of Viking history and accolades?
>>1882866
Sounds like you're looking for emotional tracts instead of history, especially since you're looking fir evidence to support your predetermined conclusion. Every culture killed and raped people bro.
>>1882905
And yet this kind of shitpost won't get you banned but saying the N-word will.