This is a man.
It doesn't count if you pull the feathers out. Quit being a wise ass, Diogenes.
>>1888918
it looks like a cock, it is a cock
i'm sorry, we are humans we see what we see, we do some pattern matching and that's how it goes
I don't have to extract a cell sample and do a PCR to prove it's a cock
b-broad flat nails
Particularly in the Atlantic during the 15th to 18th century?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr6DhdHSgjQ
Dosh.
You came from nothing and you only know how to work ships, your pay in the Navy was less than 1/10 of when you were a pirate. People take the gamble that they'll be the 10% that survive piracy.
Also a lot of pirates were privateers under contract with governments.
>>1888814
A lot of people will say money.
But I like to think it also had to do with the fact that talented commoners were prevented from advancing in there society.
Besides the very brief revolutionary period, you had to be a noble to climb the ranks in the military.
If you are a talented ambitious member of the third estate, do you join the navy and spend the rest of your life as a deckhand for some incompetence noble or do you and your friends scrounge up enough money to buy a small vessel and go pirating?
>>1888814
sex
many pirates brought back sex slaves
Why was Western society as conservative as ever in 1960 and completely changed and liberalized by 1969? What can happen in one decade that makes everything change so fast?
baby boomers. as in a disproportionate amount of the population at the same was teenagers coming of age.
but the stereotype of everyone being a grass smoking hippy is the 60s was a bit of a meme. most people were boring squares with regular jobs who just liked listening to the Beatles and the rolling Stones.
>>1888805
That's about how long it takes for a few crops of people to go through communist indoctrination at universities, which began in the early 1960s and started taking effect towards the end of that decade.
>>1888805
Honestly, it's a bunch of things
The counter culture that grew out of anti-war protests that chose to defy the will of their conservative parents
The death of religion, at least in public life in many countries.
Anti-socialist backlash due to NATO propoganda made the old labour left unfashionable, to be replaced by what would become the Greens and liberal progressives.
The USSR may have played a role in pushing Cultural Marxism in western academia, it was within its power and honestly wouldn't be very hard.
>Latin america
>is neither latin or american
>>1888758
They are in the American continent and spoke a Latin language.
>>1888758
>Holy Roman Empire
>Neither holy or Roman
>>1888758
if they are not america, what do you say they are?
>>1888771
Is the term latin used so that can group portuguese and spanish together, distance from the old world mother land or both?
When I started checking out "modern art" movements, I always come out with a very wierd feeling of cognitive dissonance.
Let's say for Dada:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dada
This wiki page lists Ebola as a Dada artist.
What the fuck? Isn't this guy loved by traditionalists?
Then I look at futurism and it looks to me like the Nazis would of happily torched it if they could.
Then I look at pic related, and have no idea what I'm seeing, are there any principles to Bauhaus? Isn't it supposed to be architecture?
I have read the "Dada manifesto" and also what I think was the "Bauhaus manifesto" and while they are cutesy I think I came out more confused in the end.
What is this madness? Is it supposed to just be autistic and nothing more or is there something based in it? And also, what is the relationship between different 20th century ideologies and ideologues to all of this?
>>1888729
bump for interest
>>1888729
"Modern Art" is a vague term which the layman will give one definition, and the obsessive art historian another.
>>1888729
If dada and bauhaus are what you'd like to understand check out a lecture by Experimental Jetset.
So lets try to keep this as /pol/ free as we can.
Why exactly did slavery become illegal?
Looking at history nothing is ever done solely for 'moral' reasons.
What made people favor freeing slaves, when it meant giving up so much wealth?
It's kind of an oddity in human history from my perspective.
>>1888680
It used to be necessary for having a powerful empire, by that time the technology and alternative labor forces made it unnecessary. It was still profitable but the moral aspect was no longer outweighed by the profit for many people.
the industrial revolution shifted the economy from the fields to the cities and increased the availability of cheap consumer goods
so in one hand, you don't need that much labor on the fields (which was the main reason to have slaves) and in the other the need to have people who can buy your shit increases, but since slaves have no salaries or even property it's more difficult
>>1888680
>Looking at history nothing is ever done solely for 'moral' reasons
You don't think people could possibly have moral objections to owning human beings?
Charles V ruled over a humongous empire, controlling Spain, the Netherlands, the New World, and the Holy Roman Empire. Hevalso fought the Ottoman Turks for most of his reign. He never fully defeated the Turks. He also battled against the Reformation.
If Charles had not been forced to fight the Turks could he have stopped the Reformation?
If the Reformation had never started could he have defeated the Ottomans?
>>1888585
>If Charles had not been forced to fight the Turks could he have stopped the Reformation?
Probably not.
>If the Reformation had never started could he have defeated the Ottomans?
Probably not.
We're dealing with a still largely feudal monarchy, where the absent king (and Charles spent almost all of his rule in what's now Austria) has to rely on a bunch of people he's probably only met once in his life to carry out his policies, which they may or may not want to do. It's relatively easy to amass troops for a campaign, that's something that the state's "bureaucracy" knows how to do. Actually implement a radical religious change? Occupy and dismember a state whose values are radically opposed to yours even if you can beat them in battle? Much, much harder. Directing changes to the world like some grand strategy game wasn't how real life worked.
Blame the Eternal Frank
Charles V couldn't chew his food properly due to his deformed jaw, so he often had digestion issues. I learned to chew my food more thoroughly because of him and how he's my favorite monarch.
Does /his know any good sources for shield and helmet painting? anything between 800-1280AD.
>>1888581
museum pieces.
http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/dect/hd_dect.htm
>>1888668
thanks
>>1888581
well i just happen to have a bunch off pics of paintet armour pices
What prompted the evolution of arms and armour during the Middle Ages BEFORE gunpowder?
>>1888506
Fashion
>>1888506
metalurgy
>>1888509
>joust to the right
It's perfect.
but thats incorrect
>>1888487
>muh greater groß germanit-hydroxid
What are some autists, betas, or generally downtrodden unfortunate sods who beat the odds and have accomplished formidable things throughout history?
>>1888479
>>1888499
Actually though
>>1888479
He got to be president whilest shirking presidential responsibility to his asshole of a VP. That counts right?
What casus belli does the US actually have for fighting ISIS?
>>1888388
we alrady have an ISIS thread
>>1888056
>>1888391
>muh generals
>>1888391
This is not an ISIS thread.
Gods... I hate Gauls.
>>1888334
No, you are not smart, and much less original.
>>1888334
Senpai please notice me.
>>1888334
here have some corn Caekun
The Greeks could have ruled the world...
>>1888291
Lolno
>>1888291
Macedonians were barbarians, not real greeks. couldn't even conquer shitty Sparta.
>>1888291
>lasted shorter than the Roman Republic
Fuck off
Is it true that Jesus's likeness was based off of Cesare Borgia?
Yes Jesus as a colored man made whyte by dirty insecure whyte bois
Pic related is how Jesus would have REALLY looks like
>>1888427
DAS RITE