Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 2522. page

Someone explain where this meme came from? Its like /his/ national meme i swear to fuck

>>1887307
There's no need to explain, it simply exist, much like God.

>>1887312
Go to bed Pajeet

>evil

how can he be evil?
he believes in god

>>1887284
>objectively... evil
No

/his/ on suicide watch

No, clearly all evidence points to a virgin birth.

>>1887147
What evidence?

>>1887091
Follow orders because pulling that kind of gung ho action is only tolerated in the Japanese army

you would probably get lynched by million turks who were already protesting in favor of returning of istanbul
that is if you didnt get shot by brits first for not following orders
turkeys efforts of reclaiming instanbul was backed by the usa and brits didnt have power necessary to fight against a US backed turkish army

>>1887225
not to mention that giving istanbul back meant that turkey would pay ottoman empires debts whereas a conflict would mean more economical strain on england

>>1886973

History repeats itself, big fucking whoop

someone said that America went from Barbarism to Decadence without civilization in between

this was during the Gilded age

File: 1431755188244.jpg (67KB, 420x468px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 420x468px

>America is remarkably similar to the falling stages of the Roman Republic

I'm going to guess it had something to do with the fact that at the time the overwhelming majority of people weren't wage laborers but simply lived comfy lives on their farms.

>>1886788
Probably because the idea behind /leftypol/ got BTFO in 391 B.C. and has been a laughingstock ever since. Now fuck off to /pol/, commieshit, this is a history board.

>Why did the enlightenment seem to "stop"
the enlightenment has "stopped" just as much as the cold war has "stopped".

it won't be over until moral realism is recognized as an artificial abstraction.

>>1886736
>Is the rate of PTSD higher in modern soldiers than in other eras
Unsure. The primary sources indicate that PTSD was very much a thing according to psychohistorians.

>Did Grant or Sherman have trouble sleeping at night after the Civil War?
Grant for sure did. He had trouble sleeping at night DURING the Civil War.

>Did Henry V get flashbacks to the bloody corpses of Agincourt?
>Did Ceaser hear the screams of barbarians in his head when anyone mention Gaul?
Probably.

>>1886736
>Did Ceaser hear the screams of barbarians in his head when anyone mention Gaul?

No because "gaul" is a Germanic term, Caesar knew that land as Gallia. And no, "gaul" is not etymologically related to "gallia", the resemblance is purely coincidental.

>>1886736
>Did Grant or Sherman have trouble sleeping at night after the Civil War?
Sherman maybe, but Grant always slept like a baby after blacking out drunk.

>Did Henry V get flashbacks to the bloody corpses of Agincourt?
The guy got shot in the face with an arrow and had the point pulled out of his face bones with no anesthetic. The guy was metal as fuck. So probably not.

>Did Caesar hear the screams of barbarians in his head when anyone mentioned Gaul?
What the hell do you think he masturbated to?

Seriously though, I don't think that modern soldiers get PTSD at a higher instance than soldiers throughout history, it is just diagnosed at a higher instance now than ever before. Also, with the awareness of PTSD, the benefits one can get for having it, and the stigma against it having been destroyed, a lot more people are coming out of the woodwork who have it compared to previous wars.

They had problems with it in World War I, and a lot of that war was mind-shatteringly brutal and terrible beyond anything ever seen before or since.
When the ancient Israelites were slaughtering the Phoenician settlers of Palestine, the practice was that after slaughtering a bunch of them, the warriors wouldn't be allowed back into camp for a day and had to cleanse themselves. They would pray, cool down, relax, meditate, or whatever. It was their way of keeping these guys who were committing genocide from getting to a place where they could never come home mentally.

>>1886698
A utopia/dystopia in relation to what? We are currently living in someone's utopia/dystopia right now.

>>1886698

Wilhelm II is aborted

>Empires still exist
>Communism fades into obscurity
>No Hitler
>Eastern Germans aren't ethnically cleansed
>Nationalism isn't taboo
>No multicult

>>1886864
>muh semantics and relative ideals
What ever is you think is better for you.

>stateless
>society
pick one

It doesn't, that's why communism/anarchism has to be global to "work"

>>1886689
It doesn't.

Or more precisely, it tries and fails miserably.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Territory

>>1886677
hack

>>1886677
5/10 It's Okay

meh

File: 1474184528319.png (445KB, 768x516px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 768x516px

>>1886657
You step into the Virtual Plaza.

Why would you want to?

Just embrace it. Objectivity is a meme.

>>1886657
Drugs are the easy way

Read Il Principe

>>1886587
Charisma

>>1886610
Also needs to be a leader

Actual thinking people
>Clearly our abilities, attained through scholarly education, better nutrition, more varied lifestyles, and generally more developed societies prove we are more intelligent than the average medieval peasant, who had none of these things.

People on /his/
>u can't no nuffin' lol he thinks he can hoe a field r u serious people are dumber than ever trust me i should know

>>1886598
I know this isn't pol, but how modern day blacks fare versus ancient white people?

Taking into account the flynn effect.

>>1886461

>Genghis Khan

>Alexander the great

>Mohamed

>Shivaji

>Shaka Zulu

>William the Conqueror

>Hannibal Barcas

>Baibars

>>1886461
Hitler not even /pol/ing.
That guy started as a bum with with nothing in his pockets and became one the most powerfull people of his time.

>>1887896
>Shaka zulu
>Literally less popular than Qin Shi Huang
>Inspirational
Hmm

>>1886418
The Holocaust. Whenever you get into an argument with a redditor/dawkins fanshit just mention racialism and the holocaust and watch them implode

Yes, see:

https://answersingenesis.org/

>>1886418

Science is built to flexible: look at the world, make some observations, test, make predictions, repeat. If a foundational theory is found to be wrong, the problem is not with science, the problem is with the observation or prediction that was made, or the test performed. It's what scientific rigor is all about.

Science isn't any faith-based system: you are entirely free to perform any experiment yourself and see if your results agree with the prevailing scientific consensus. That's what peer review is for. Maybe you'll find something new; that's what Nobel prizes are for.