Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 1860. page

>>2309677
They are the niggers of europe

>>2309722
That's Albania

>>2309725
Thought we agreed they're the sandniggers of Europe?

>>2309619
Yes. Battle of Britain as not even close. Britain was always producing more planes, producing more pilots, losing less planes, and losing less pilots.

>>2309619
Yes, the main reason being the inability of the Luftwaffe to maintain fighter cover for their bombers for an extended period of time and the shift from bombing airfields and radar stations to cities. Not belittling the contribution of squadrons like 303 but there were bigger factors in play.

What is it with all these /int/posting NEETs shitting on better men than they just to take a swipe at the Brit's, /his/ is rotten with them.

hussar armor is from like 50 years later

WE WUZ SUSANIN AND SHIEEEEET NIGGA

DIMITRI AIN'T MY TSAR

File: 1481128356153.jpg (160KB, 735x1000px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 735x1000px

>>2309614
So how would it have looked like in 1612?

>>2309373
Any evidence to back that up?

File: 20100408205743!Map_of_Bulgaria_during_WWII.png (149KB, 800x583px)

149KB, 800x583px

>>2309241
>is it rightful Bulgarian clay
Yes

>>2309241
False. Bulgaria is rightfully Macedonian clay.
(The further past the claim the more legitimacy, right?)

>positivism still exists in 2017
>even among educated people

Embarrassing

>>2309114

This applies to pretty much everything.

Politically, for example, if you're outside the Overton windows (leftwards, rightwards, doesn't matter), you'll find it incredibly hard to argue with people about politics even though the same people are able to discuss other issues while being cognizant of their biases and presupposition.

Behaviors you're going to encounter

- Show me that your position is accurate! (by this set of criteria that you don't share)

- The set of criteria I'm arguing for are just obivously the most rational! (probably weren't even shared by a majority of people a few decades earlier)

- Your position is just based on *ideological accusation/psychological accusation* (doesn't realize his position is vulnerable to analogous accusations)

- I came to my conclusion through REASON and EVIDENCE (doesn't realize the mind-boggling coincidence of coming purely through reason and evidence to the conclusion that his society finds acceptable)

- Your position has problems, therefore it's worse than mine (nevermind that his has problems too, unless yours is perfect, it's never going to be enough)

>>2309114
I feel ya. Ask a question about the bible, give a bible verse that answers it, get told they don't care what the bible says. It's anti-intellectualism at this point.

it was cause of muh fog

>>2309098
Why do you think Hitler let the English "escape" at Dunkirk, instead of failing to destroy the pocket?

>>2309109
Because the Panzers just stayed still for 4 days after brushing their way through France. Unless there was some sort of natural barrier that made they stop it seems rather deliberate

>>2308724
>Americans seem to love the natives.
This is mostly Protestant guilt complex.

As for my personal opinion (as an American) , I view the red Indians as just another group of political players. 90% of them were inevitable going to die due to smallpox and I don't weep because our ancestors didn't come offering them gold, Frankincense and myrrh.

>>2308724
I'd bang that native if that's what you're asking me. But she looks more white than red folk

>>2308724
Native Americans have historically been considered an obstacle and a nuisance towards development and modernism. Displacing natives was often seen as the only option as white settlers wished to create a similar lifestyle in the Western half of the country as they did in the Eastern, developed half. The fact that many tribes violently resisted this silent invadikn gave the US military every justification needed to uproot their land and wipe out tribes who fought back.

The US has recognized in recent years that it's treated many tribes like dogshit and that we owe it to ourselves to recognize that these people did exist and that we did do some very shitty things to them, much like other colonial nations such as Australia, New Zealand etc. The things you mentioned are just a few small ways that solidarity is attempted.

Virgin Mary Comeback Tour, but the album didn´t sell too well

>people stare at the sun too long
>start seeing stuff

>>2308615
I don't really believe in the Fatima situation

>>2308143
We would turn into an ocean of tang

>>2308198
>We would turn into an ocean of tang
/thread

>>2308198
this is correct

>>2307977
Absolutely. Spirituality is an essential part of the human experience.

Spirituality is inalienable from consciousness. When we project ourselves into the past, future, some happenstance far away or close by or merely make-believe, we put ourselves in the abstract and learn something about how we must behave to sate our desires.

Can spiritual also mean transcendent, or simply serving something bigger than oneself such as one's nation?

Will it give me access to Dany?

File: tired.png (154KB, 392x390px)

154KB, 392x390px

>>2307880
>Randomly capitalized nouns
D R O P P E D

>referring to self in 3rd person
>Plato and the Greeks "invented" abstract thought
>compares himself to Kant
>live hard
>its just Unitarian Universalism

It isn't insane like Timecube or that other blog that was getting spammed a while back, it is just airy and pretentious.

UU's are great people tho, join up, get involved with a community, whatever keeps you from murderous rampages idgaf

Buddhism is seen as the framework of the cosmos

The Shinto deities occupy the role of the devas within Japanese Buddhism: powerful beings worthy of devotion, but still victims of samsara

The Buddh of Japan is not prince Siddhartha Guatama

>>2307344
Buddhism demands very little of political system. The praxis of Buddhism can also easily exist without its original foreign deities, and can also assimilate domestic gods. It's inherently syncretic except with it comes in contact with dualist religions like the Abrahamisms.

Slaves were expensive though.

Adjusted for inflation, you're talking 10,000 a head for even the entry level basic bitch field negroes.

You could easily get into the 60/70k range for slaves from the parts of Africa that knew how to farm, so you could buy that expert knowledge of rice paddies or sweet potatoes and stuff.

You'd be better off selling them.

dude wat

No? Why would there be?

Slaves were worth a lot of money. You could sell them even at low prices to buy infinitely more food than eating them.

>Europeans get triggered when we call ourselves German/Irish/Italian-American
>Natives get triggered when we call ourselves American

Wikipedia links for those interested

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_ethnicity
>"Why should I let these freaks cast whole ballots when they are only half Americans?"
>"Any man who carries a hyphen about with him carries a dagger that he is ready to plunge into the vitals of this Republic whenever he gets ready."[4][5][6]
>"There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all … The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic … There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else"

interestingly, if we accept the American Ethnicity as true, that makes them a subset of the Anglic group, meaning it goes something like
Indo-European -> Germanic -> West Germanic -> Anglo-Friscian -> Anglic -> American