Archived threads in /biz/ - Business & Finance - 6486. page

>>1576498
hire a lawyer

>>1576498
Hide it in my basement and slowly launder it. Tell no one.

>>1576512
wouldn't it take forever to launder that?

Noisecancelling headphones.

chip warmer

>>1597651
Sex toys obviously

>>1597584
Market's way too saturated. There are much better opportunities.

>>1597584
Wow somehow that guy manages to pull off a trash 'stache surprisingly well. I wonder if it's the suit?

>>1597584
Ahhh it's a /biz/ starts a thread about industries it knows nothing about thread
One word: Distribution.

You need a distribution channel with a proven revenue stream.

I could easily produce profitable fare: I have the technical ability, I have the experience. However I don't have the distribution method or following (customers).

Content in and of itself is virtually worthless without exposure, to get exposure you either need to buy airtime with a traditional broadcaster or slowly build up a niche audience through targeted advertising, publicity stunts etc. etc. etc.

Then once you have exposure, how do you monetize it?
Youtube has virtually killed content as an income source -- unless you get massive volume like Jenna Marbles or those kids, you can't make enough money. So you have to look at niche audiences and finding other sources of revenue. Home Video and mail order videos for example aren't an option any more, there's too much competition from various makers on Youtube, you need to look further afield.

Also you need to reinvent your value proposition: a comedy or a horror doesn't cut it any more if you're making traditional narrative, it needs to have a gimmick or an experience beyond the watching of the film.

>>1597443

>open /r9k/
>post "normies reee" or "mummy change me" or whatever you losers post now

There you go. You're networking with other robots.

Be attractive

>>1597443
Try r9k

Also, this>>1597452

File: 100 percent enemy.jpg (37KB, 330x394px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 330x394px

>>1597394
fuck off /pol/ leave us out of this

Bump. Rothchild internal docs.. 30gb of them.

>>1597408

>Mongrel

Ethereum is in a spot where it needs DApps

DApps fulfill the purpose of the system and attracts users. This is a predicament for people interested in short term gains in regards to Ethereum. It's a pretty simple model: Build things and sell them, but it's also hard to accomplish because the platform itself is just not ready yet for widespread adoption.

So, either a DApp gets made that is able to provide great service depsite the platforms current instability (MetaMask is a great example of this, Gnosis and Status.im are too)

or, we have to wait for new technology to be added to the platform that makes development easier or scales the system allowing for faster verifiable transactions.

>>1597496

In addition, shill DApps that fool the existing consumers on Ethereum are a really, really bad look and I wish they would go away.

>>1597365

Ether is a failure.

Paper money is where it's at.

>mfw you people don't even have 100$ in your wallet
it's like you WANT to be poor

>>1597231
What's his campaign about?
>inb4 retro games

>>1597248
It's a physical product.

>>1597231
Buy real estate in London. I promise I won't kill your account for it.

>>1597176
set up a roth IRA and contribute the annual max ($5500), just pick out one of the target date funds with vanguard if you want, that should have you set for retirement savings

after that index whatever else you want to save for other major purchases like a house or a car or something

>>1597176
If you don't get a match, Roth > 401K. Only fund the 401k if you max out the Roth.

>just pick out one of the target date funds with vanguard
This is very good advice.

>>1597176
Gold denominated forex accounts that are divided up into 10 of the most reliable high-yielding signals.

They can make well over 50% a year so even if 3/10 go bust due to mis-management you'd still cut a profit.

>>1597070
Nothing. Buy the books and read them if your projects require the knowledge.

>>1597097

Engineering doesn't work like that, it's not like software where anyone and their dog can get into a position. It's very structured when it comes to qualifications and the positions you're allowed to enter based upon them.

>>1597105
Corporations don't work like that*

If you need it for a job then pick the better school. I just chose a private university over cheap public school to finish my ME/AE bachelors. I only plan to work for someone else until I can get my PE though, which is why I consider a masters to be useless. My mind may change in the future though.

>>1596979
I have no idea but start doing something tomorrow.. anything.
I quit like that and became a NEET, I needed 3 years to realize that I want to do something else with my life than being a poor loser. I've just slowly started to rebuild my life and it's hard as hell. But it's gonna worth it!

>>1596983
Yeah but how did you get money to live is what I'm worried about lol because the money is just gonna stop after I quit and I still wanna eat but I don't wanna work

>>1596984
Lived at home with my mother and grandparents. I eat what was in the kitchen, basically they paid for everything. I still don't have a real job, not own business or steady income but I'm getting there somehow.

Finance majors are extremely useless.

>>1597003
t. NEET

>>1597014
more like
t. Martin Shkreli, a finance major

You're not required to have specifically finance degree to do just about anything. You can't say that for accounting or engineering.

Bitcoin.

>>1596960
>Ron Paul pls go
Guns, ammo, canned goods

Currently doing that.
Converting all of my assets to bitcoin.

Im wondering about another soultions

>>1596881
no. they were corrupt as fuck and largely undercut markets and ruined many perfectly legal businesses with corruption

no. just assholes pretty much.

>>1596881
They were a necessary evil in WW2 and WW2 only. The FBI hired the mafia to look for German spies attempting to get onto the docks or even infiltrate any field of work that may put them near the docks.

Nazis had no idea how corrupt NYC unions were, they thought they were dealing with government agents trying to find them, not some mob boss who would take a bat to your knees on mere suspicion because he got 10k per "spy" caught in 1940 USD.

Yeah try sucking my 9 foot long Investment Banker dick you fucking plebian.

>>1596876
Nice name, edgelord. Shouldn't you be posting on /pol/?

SHouldn't you be watching me cum in your girlfriend in my NY Loft for $40?

>>1596818
I think that it is inevitable. I think stupid people have made it a bad word because they think it means jobs will disappear. Jobs WILL disappear and be replaced by jobs requiring education, training, and high levels of professional skill. I think providing more opportunities for people to get those skills would really help the situation in America. Look at Germany. They are are great example of the populace being prepared for the changing work environment.

I think the distinction between economical, cultural and political globalization should be made.

Economical globalization (free trade) is good, some people will lose jobs but the benefits will compensate for that due to lower domestic prices.

Cultural globalization is usually a bad idea, since many cultures simply do not mix. I think asians mix fairly well in western countries, and tend to do good there. But middle east and northern Africans just do not mix. They're too different and don't benefit western countries at all. In the same way, western immigrant wouldn't benefits north African countries because they would fit in that culture. Also, this is not being racist, as many butthurts assume, but just the fact that some cultures don't mix.

Political globalization causes countries to give up their domestic policies, which can be really bad if the countries in this particular political group aren't very similar. In the EU for example, the north westen states are just so different (economically and culturally) than southern and eastern states, that the same politicy for all will never work.

In short, globalization on trade? Yes. On cultures and politics? Nope.

>>1596818
Global relations is inferior to foreign relations. Trade should be managed on a country-to-country basis. Globalization is bad when it turns into people sticking their noses where they don't belong.