Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 79. page

File: 1448601263707.jpg (238KB, 1337x1289px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1337x1289px

>>3108401
and you think this deserved a fucking thread?

vidshit is worse than snapshits you fucking retard.

>>3108402
this is 4k quality. are you on crack? go take some more selfies with your iphone 4

>>3108401
Was this hand held and you got tired holding up your "ultra light" mirror less camera 20 seconds into the video or were you just actually not sure if the fireworks should be in the frame while you were recording?

It's fucking basic to be honest my familama. Either use vsco or desaturate your reds somewhat and boost your blues. I would not regard this as a high watermark for color processing.

>>3108336
>use vsco
>desaturate your reds somewhat and boost your blues
You're in /p/ everyday and you don't know the first thing about processing. Kick the chair, you fucking loser.

>>3108378

Sick refute, retard.

>>3108235
Easy don't be a pussy and shoot from the hip..

>>3108235
use a rolleiflex

>>3108235
Get good.

Or crop.

>>3108198
>red

Get your eyes check dude

It looks like you just cropped the sky from an iPhone 4s 8 megapixel landscape.

With that said, I'm a sucker for minimalism.

>>3108316
nothing minimalist in that picture, my literally visually illiterate friend.

>>3108182
>Pentax is doomed
>micro four turds is finished
>Canikon are kill
you see a lot of shit like this here, yet for example Canon just came out with a shitty 6D mark II that they KNOW is going to sell even though it's barely an improvement

Ricoh is doing just fine to keep Pentax afloat

etc.

>>3108184
>Pentax is doomed
>micro four turds is finished
>Canikon are kill
+1

>>3108182
The focus on dslr is photography, the focus on milcs is both photography and video. Many of us understand and will not deny this. That dslrs don't even offer a reasonable compromise of video and dslrs are also missing possibilities of optical viewfinders, makes them the market losers. It's the innovations for milcs in photography, which make them even more interesting. As I'm only consumer and no professional and I'm supposing so are you, we won't be even bothered with the few typical quirks and reproaches with milc compared to dslr photography.
It's certainly not a bad idea of conventional companies to offer dedicated devices for the professional market. However, without having more insight, I hardly believe that professionals are able to carry the conventional camera market.

Having said this, I'll buy Canons 6D2 at a price tag of 1300 bucks in used condition. First I don't want to spend more money on an upgrade or a system change, second because of my father and some friends which feel more comfortable with Canon. They also feel comfortable using their cameras in an unchanged manner for the last 10 years and more, regardless of new features and increased quality or dr.

Since I am not sure about my statements, I'd be happy if others joined the discussion.
English is not my first language. I've already deleted and corrected this post..

>>3108182
>I've been seeing a influx of 'Pentax is doomed' posts

/p/ doesn't really know it's arse from a hole in the wall, most of them refuse to look beyond their own self-obsessed bubble. If a company does something that they don't agree with or want to buy, said company is doomed.

Most of them just want feature crammed toys. Features like: I can put it in my pocket, I can shoot movies of the cat in 4k or I can shoot 20 frames per second with out shutter blackout ... How long is the shutter blacked out for when you are shooting 20 frames per second? Do you even notice it?

They are certainly not interested in a durable and reliable tool that some people might want to take into the big dangerous world outside and actually take photographs with.

Pentax is a long established brand and it isn't going anywhere. If the worst comes to the worst another company will step in and buy it.

File: DSC02943-1.jpg (249KB, 1000x645px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1000x645px

>>3108084
Need to get a usb-c>3.5mm female for this combo.

>>3108084
>>3108087
You didn't create shit.

File: 2017-07-05 18.20.33.jpg (1MB, 1152x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1152x2048px

I created this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:05:27 18:04:52
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
ISO Speed Rating	40
Flash	Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
F-Number	f/2.4
White Balance	Auto

File: DSC02554.jpg (1MB, 4678x2649px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4678x2649px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-5R
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 23:48:28
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC09413.jpg (917KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 1000x668px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.22
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:03 18:57:36
Exposure Time	1/1250 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	5.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: ste1.jpg (388KB, 1215x841px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 1215x841px

Tinty or...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D80
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	842
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4859
Image Height	3362
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2017:07:03 23:57:45
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1215
Image Height	841
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3106536
Sure, if it's in working order. It's old, and it has limitations, but it's not bad.

>>3106536
ye

just don't expect too much from it

>>3106536
No seriously you are going to be very disappointed, at this point you much rather get a Ricoh Digital II or III or so for nearly the same price.

It's worse than your smartphone.

File: DDAvppVW0AQ6v08.jpg (88KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1200x900px

One afternoon on here would have sorted him out....

File: Brooklyn-Beckham-4.jpg (110KB, 1368x1026px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1368x1026px

Has there ever been a more punchable face?

>>3102584
How did he miss focus on that

>white whore being a whore
>late night cityscape melancholy
romanticizing mindless roasties is simply not a good practice.

>>3108325
>liking things is simply not a good practice

>>3108321
Saved for later use.

>>3108325
Titled accordingly.

Zoom lenses are for 1) photojournalists and 2) dummies who think they haven't "made it" until they buy a $2500 2.8 zoom. It's a rite of passage for those wannabes.

Also I guess some wedding photographers need them, but those poor fools are photographers in the same sense that a house painter is a portraitist.

>>3107877
>Zoom lenses are for 1) photojournalists
>tfw no qt 35 mm lens on a range finder shooting at f8

>>3107877
This guy's girl left him for a wedding photographer.

post processing is cheating

is this the thread for the nophoto cucks?

>>3100954
To each his own. Don't like pp, then don't use filters on your work. No need to try to sway everyone else into doing that too because you don't like it.

>>3107817
It isn't medium format, it is like medium crop. It is smaller than the hasslblad digital medium format which is smaller than film medium format.

There is no competition when the market is shrinking.
Canikon owns 24x36 dslr territory and smartphones devoured entry level segment.
The only way is up where it's already an overcrowded tiny room.

There will be blood.

It's mainly positioned to kill Pentax MF.

In my opinion, Pentax is feeling the heat right now, they already fired 1000 Pentax employees in north america. And Ricoh is in huge trouble now, they are about to fire more people from the photocopy department.
Meanwhile their MF cameras are clashing with the new Fuji MF and Hasselblad MF.

Why do turbofags like OP keep making pointless, shitty bait threads like this?
You're the cancer that's killing /p/.

Saged.

>>3107429
fuji has never built a large, extensive, competitive camera system. you got what you paid for.

>>3107448
Agreed.

>t. disgruntled Fujifilm film camera user
You're not fooling anyone, sonygger.

What a fucking mongo

>>3106646
t. Not A Pro