Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 930. page

>>8618105
Narcissistic personality disorder + The Female Brain = Gender Dysphoria

>>8618105
That pic gave me cancer

>>8618105
This entire time, feminists and people who identify as different genders are the best trolls and we have all been to autistic to notice.

"Be sure to drink your Ovaltine"

>>8625557
[The key to this cipher is trivial and has been left as an exercise for the reader]

>>8625557
bump

>>8625050
your mom

>>8625050
A quantitative definition with inherent properties

>Draw a line
>On your line, place a dot. This is your point of origin, or '0'
>Next, draw a second dot on your line that is to the right of the origin.
>The distance between your two dots is the unit length, or '1'
>Mark another dot one unit length to the right of your previous dot
> Repeat
Congratulations, you now have a number line.

>tfw 2.5 GPA in my 3rd year

File: 1479605955860.png (93KB, 1155x508px)

93KB, 1155x508px

>tfw remembering my grades in first year

>>8622735
impressive turnaround dude, how'd you do it?

>>8621822
because they are unemployed

their dum dums

>>8621822
They don't seem pissed
They look rather calm actually

observe pi

>>8618744
Good argument. Infinite objects are hard to observe but the more we can observe that system the closer we get to pi.

>>8618741
>Sources of knowledge

Sciences that use deduction and induction as their methods do not generate new knowledge, they just study stuff that is alredy there.

Mathematicians didnt create any new knowledge when they first realized 2+2 was 4. 2+2 was 4 even before anyone noticed because it logically derives from the initial axioms.

>Thirdly, Peirce argued that abduction is the logical inference by which new knowledge could be obtained: \Abduction consists in studying the facts and devising a theory to explain them. Its only justi cation is that if we are ever to understand things at all, it must be in that way.

So sciences who produce new knowledge are those who use abduction like philosophy.

Im not saying that one is better than the other but you should stop talking shit you dont know about.

holy fuck do you not know how to read fractions? get out of here, American

Increases

>>8625914
Thanks, can you justify it?

>>8625718
Like you gonna read it.

>>8625728
>reading books
>not learning as you drill through the exercises

>>8625718
>t. Den Hartog

>>8625651
>only grad school matters

>picking your grad school based on reputation and not research direction

shiggy

>>8625651
It's true that the top universities sometimes cover more, but when it comes down to it, a degree in (speciality) engineering is a degree in engineering. With the exception of possibly the first employer, most aren't going to put much stock in your schooling, but instead your employment record, because all fresh engineering grads only know the basics, no matter where they came from.

And for the record, MIT calc sequence doesn't cover more than most schools (it actually covers less than a great many), because their calc courses are meant to function as a quick review (everyone accepted into MIT has taken at least calc 1). I followed Ocw when I was taking my calc sequence and we covered a lot more (probably because it was 3 semesters, and not 2). It's my belief that the power of top institutions lies in the prestige/ability of their professors, not the material they're teaching. Right now one of my physics professors can barely speak English, talks extremely low because he's unsure of himself. I imagine that doesn't happen at MIT

>>8625651

> When I once posted a problem from the first year Oxford maths course on here as a way to troll people at worse universities, I got tonnes of abuse.

Curious to see what that problem was and how did you get it from. I'm also butthurt that I go to a noname yuropoor university (especially considering that I had a real chance to study dans la France), but I guess if you show initiative, motivation and get up to par with Cambridge/Oxford/whatever students' syllabus on your free time, you can still get pretty damn far.

>>8625586
You literally can't

>>8625586
You figuratively can't

>>8625586
if only we lived in hilbert space this would be easy :'(

>>8624922
identity

>>8624922
To make autism speak.

>>8624922
Chronic retardation.

>>8624778
bump ill do it later maybe got biology exam in two hours

You should post it with a picture of cartoon girl on front of blackboard with your problem written on it and add "you should be able to solve this" so we wouldn't notice it's your homework

>>8624778
>On the intake stroke, it draws in a stoichiometrically perfect amount of ethanol and air. How much of that is ethanol? How much is oxygen?
Google the ideal azeotrope for ethanol and oxygen in the gaseous phase. Remember that 70% of the air is nitrogen or what ever

>>8624651
>upper level math
>undergrad course using baby Rudin

Pick one.

>>8624673
Yeah I am taking a remedial class but it's good that I'm doing so because the grad level sequence would probably kick my ass even more. Is the jump in difficulty from rudin to graduate level texts really high? Will I ever get used to doing extremely technical proofs assuming I'm only barely slightly above average in intelligence?

>>8624697
Grad class content isn't that much different, at least early on with upper division undergrad. The difference is that the content is convered more quickly and the profs don't hold your hand through the development of the content. That puts more work on you, which is why it seems harder. I took a grad level class this semester because I met the pre reqs. But the review material was from courses I hadn't taken so I dropped it for something else. I definitely could have made it through but it would have been a lot more work than I'm willing to put in.

Get a good job and make lots of money.

>>8624598
By getting rich and popular from it, which is what pussy is actually attracted to.

>>8624623
/thread

[math] You \; write \; a^b \Sigma O Lutely \; everything \in \LaTeX, \; FAGGOT. [/math]

>>8625168
Latex sucks massive wiener

>>8625168
never change /sci/