What the hell is Cern? I've heard some sketchy shit in my days, but this one definitely takes the cake. I mean, can somebody with a reliable source tell me what they are experimenting on?
Also if you're wondering, i'm not into the field of science, but just wondering
>>8624264
Literally just google it. Check wikipedia. Why so lazy? It's why you're a failure.
>>8624264
>can somebody with a reliable source tell me what they are experimenting on?
>>8624264
It's researchers financed by EU countries. Can't tell more, just that they have build a 27km wide particules accelerator in Switzerland
>posts one (1) image
>>8623696
>>8623696
rely maeks u tinc
PrrrrrrREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEvious thread: >>8605115
Questions that don't deserve their own posts go here.
What's a decent approximation for how much of an explosion's force a prism would be exposed to?
Approximation, really I'd be fine if I could just get to within an order of magnitude.
I rolled a 1 on my physics lab group. Should I drop out, kill myself or both?
Some data I've collected follows an inverse bell curve pattern. Technically I guess the distribution would be bimodal.
What descriptive statistic would you use to report results on such a distribution?
Doesn't seem like the mean would be representitive of the data if it has the smallest frequency in the histogram.
Or do I need to transform this shit?
Could a group of fish, such as cod, take to the skies after the demise of the birds?
You literally can't fucking argue against this shit.
There is NO reason to go to college if you are going to be a computer scientist/programmer
The only benefit, which mind you is just your fucking imagination, is the 'connections' that will make.
As if there is fucking ANYTHING stopping you from just going to campuses, attending massive lectures, talking to people, and participating in stuff without being a student.
Effective C++ coupled with Youtube and Stack Exchange will literally teach you everything you fucking need.
Once you know C++, you instantly know Java and C#
Learn a general scripting Language like Python
Then just learn HTML and Javascript and you are literally fucking set.
And all of this shit can be learned in 3 years MAX.
Whereas if you waste your time going to college, you'll barely be getting into C++ by your second year, and there very little real world experience to actually teach you how to be a practical programmer.
Please go the fuck ahead and try to prove me wrong
>>8629129
>Computer Science = Codemonkey
Wrong. You're a loser and will always be considered a lower class to an experienced compscientist.
>be in Chem.E.
>have to take a CS class as a gen ed requirement
>spend two weeks learning how to convert bases of numbers
literally what the fuck was the point of that?
>>8629179
>literally what the fuck was the point of that?
Whatever college you are in prefers teaching people memes and giving out busy work instead of letting people actually learn some programming languages and make some actual programs.
>White–Juday warp-field interferometer
http://earthtech.org/publications/davis_STAIF_conference_2.pdf
So they're trying to bend light with magnetic field or something? How is that going to work since light has no charge or mass?
I've read their article and i've noticed few weird things.
>Perhaps the reader is still struggling with the concept of how a toroidal positive energy density develops a spherical region of negative pressure. The short answer is that is what the math predicts.
Are they fucking serious?
>Since we know how to make a large spacetime expansion boost value
Care to explain?
This whole thing looks like pseudoscience, prominent use of buzzwords like "dark energy" only makes in worse. We don't even know what that is and they act as if everyone does.
>>8628813
>How is that going to work since light has no charge or mass?
In general relativity energy density can act as a source for gravitation.
>This whole thing looks like pseudoscience
It probably is, or perhaps it's better to say it's """fringe"""
>>8628813
would a strong enough magnetic field produce light in a vacuum?
>>8628829
>In general relativity energy density can act as a source for gravitation.
Has this been verified experimentally? I mean, I guess that's where the mass of a proton comes from?
What do you think of this?
>>8628755
I think weeb shits should leave.
>>8628763
>not understanding that 4chan is animesite
If you want to learn about [insert] reading about it in fucking diluded chinese strips is certainly not a good way. Go fucking read a better treatise on the subject.
Is this correct?
>>8628746
why dont you google ?
i only read the first 2 sentenses but yeah endospores what is your question exactly
>>8628746
It's a woman. So no.
>>8628888
Hahahaha, they should all just get back to the kitchen and make me a samich. Right guys? Guys?
How many oats, approximately, could fill this overtly large pig if he eats at a non-constant rate for two hours?
roughly half the number of cocks you've sucked
>>8628552
I mean that pig is pretty big but I'm not sure it would hold an infinite amount of oats.
BROTHER
What's the evolutionary purpose behind post-ejaculation regret? You know, that feeling like you've wasted your time right after you cum?
>>8628017
in b4 virgin, i've experienced it with some (but not all) of the women i've been with as well
>>8628017
i'm guessing you this was just casual sex and not for the sake of reproduction?
when you cum for the sake of reproduction there's 0 regret
>>8628017
also wasting the seed of god is literally a sin, which is why it feels bad
which civilization had more advanced mathematics of the 3?
Greece..its not even a close question
its true that Greece took alot from Babylonia but went above and beyond
Formalized mathematics, the axiomatic deductive mathematics we know today begins in Greece, specifically Euclid's Elements
Egypt is a literal who when it comes to math, they did have great practical engineering accomplishments, but there math was not on the same level as Greece or Babylonia
>>8627697
Greeks were the only society to invent the concept of mathematical proof, which from a modern perspective makes them God tier. Egyptians had some advantages though, like IIRC they had the most precise method of calculating the area of a circle.
Egypt was a bit more advanced then Babylonia. Greece was more advanced than Egypt.
By how much more advanced is going to depend on when you're talking about. Ancient Greece and Pythagoras was just a bit more advanced than Egypt, whereas later hellenistic mathematicians like Euclid and Archimedes were far more advanced.
How do you prove non-locality wrote the bible?
>pic related
bet anyone $20 bibi is a dead man walking
>>8627525
>infinite monkeys fighting over a typewriter
>>8627525
>bet anyone $20
there is no wagering at 4chan, Grandpa
Can you find a way to define this algebraically with a single non-piecewise function?
Cubic? We need more info
y(x) = -0.2x^3?
why is he admired so much by the scientific and mathematical community?
Because the names of all the Babylonians he stole from has been lost.
He developed war machines to protect the Greeks when under siege.
He identified pi.
His work on Conics was largely influential in Apollonius' work on the subject.
He started using geometrical proofs to prove fluid dynamics and physics concepts.
He wrote On Spirals, which was an unbelievably intelligent and well developed work.
>>8627399
What kind of question is that? Why is anyone admired? One need only read up on his contributions and accomplishments to find this out, the only real question is, is he admired by you??
Pythagoras is where its at though.
I saw this on facebook
But I don't get why it's true.
Shouldn't a stone eventually be placed on the original spot if the circle is finite?
>>8627341
This would only NOT be true if the distance that the stones are placed apart divided by the circumfrence was rational.
>>8627341
There are an infinite number of points on the circle.
>>8627346
the circumfrence is only 81.6 feet though, that's not infinite
So why isn't the picture balanced. Me and my friend attempted to substitute for carbon for life on low atmosphere worlds, but why doesn't it balance out, as one of our teachers said?
I feel like your energetics are gonna get all fucked up because of how strong the Si-O bond is relative to a C-O bond.
(Your equation looks perfectly balanced to me)
>>8626907
It's fine (as you could quickly verify by checking the comparable combustion of glucose).
>>8626907
cute 3s-3p interaction