Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2095. page

>>7711712
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki

>>7711712
no, because i only have 3 texts that were worth keeping throughout undergrad

>>7711712
Common core is right tho. Formally speaking 8+5 is (((((8+1)+1)+1)+1)+1) which is also equal to (((10+1)+1)+1).

>>7711524
It's been a while but just input the matrix into the function and keep doing the operations until you have a final matrix.

It's tedious, but not difficult.

>>7711526
Do you mean first taking the matrix ^3, minus the matrix multiplied by 3 and ^2, etc? Before I was just taking each number of the matrix and putting it through the equation.

>>7711524
If the point of that exercise is finding nth powers of square matrices easily you should look up eigenvalues/vectors and diagonalization of matrices. Otherwise you can just do it the slow way, which in this case may be faster.

>>7711485
the answer is:

Go away. You're a shit poster and this is a shit post.

>>7711485
6?

>not capable of solving

ti nspire CX CAS

File: 1340372401315.jpg (23KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 250x250px

>>7711381
Can it play DOOM?
>Not ripping and tearing during lectures

>>7711381

ti89

File: 030[1].jpg (150KB, 1600x1064px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1600x1064px

>>7711090
>tomarrow
see the problem with the toothpick bridge project is the glue needs time to dry. no matter how good your design is, the bridge will fail because of the not quite dry glue.

this means you do not have time to make an elegant design, like the girl who will win this year with a beautiful thin sloping style. you will have to make a design similar to this piece of shit this girl is holding, just a garbage amalgam of toothpicks and glue which will be destroyed immediately

>>7711096
All the pieces in pic have been drying for 24+ hours

File: Screenshot_2015-12-09-21-06-35-1.png (169KB, 1329x1318px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1329x1318px

Are you going for a design like this?

>>7711077
You do, you use the natural log.

>>7711080
That's really the only way to bring down an exponent like that then right?

File: 20151209_185059.jpg (3MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4128x2322px

>>7711084
Yep!

File: Freddier Mercury.jpg (45KB, 404x599px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 404x599px

>>7711021
>another one takes the meme
>and another one gone
>and another one gone
>another one takes the meme

>>7711024
What'd I do?

>>7711021

Do you actually know how to program?

>>7710970
length is actually changing

>>7710974
but how does that work? Whats the logic behind it?

>>7710975
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

>>7710919
what are you, a fucking faggot?

>>7710919
No but you might kill or make the other person go blind you dumfuck

>>7710982
why?

>>7710879
It all depends if the reactuon first starts in the presence or absence of oxygen to obtain the energy. If there is a lack of oxygen the energy produced is very low and has the byproduct lactic acid as you know. This energy drives the pathway to begin in zero and first order kinetics. The enzyme uses the energy to quickly break the bonds of a substance. I hope this helps.

>>7710901
that did not help at all. what does areobic or anerobic conditions have to do with enzyme activity? i'm talking about their activity in the context of the human body. We are not talking about gylcogenisis or glyconeogenisis or metabolism. ..

File: Fig8_5Stickase.gif (31KB, 572x428px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 572x428px

>>7710879
It comes from weak interactions between the enzyme and the substrate, such as Van der waals etc.
The activation site on the enzyme provides an ambient that stabilizes, using these interactions, the transition state of the reaction.
So the probability of the reaction going from either sides is more balanced, requiring less energy to push the transition state to the products.
The key thing is to understand that the enzyme is specific to the transition state, not to the substrate or the product.

>>7710842
>applying the reductio ad absurdum rule

No real proof would ever say that.

Is this for real? Could OP remind the general public what the complexity classes P and NP mean?

>>7710847
>P=NPists in denial

>>7710786

I mean the concept of things can still be there.

Sorry for english I am Russia

>>7710786
> >>7710787
Exactly, there can be the addition or subtraction making the innate or the anti

>>7710791

Right but can something hold relevance when at a state of current innate or anti-ness?

>>7710743
>evanomycin, C7H8O3 is very unstable acid
that doesn't sound good
>isolated from a certain type of bacteria
need to see a doctor for that
>evanomycin displays peaks in the IR region at: 3450(br), 1710, 1639, and 886 cm-1
I heard about this, last time it happened 20 people died
>evanomycin absorbs H2 to give a different acid [IR 3450(br), 1739, 1710]
pretty sure that's classified as pedophilla.
>ozonolysis of evanomycin yields formaldehyde
that shit is nasty!
>which on further oxidation with kmno4 gives glutaric acid.
jesus christ, that sounds painful
>what is the structure of evanomycin?
None of your bussness.

>>7710763
pc only bro

>>7710743
Just reduce a Glutaric acid into Glutaraldehyde (reversing the step it gives you). Now set glutaraldehyde next to a formaldehyde, and pick the oxygens to subtract that were added via ozonolysis. Don't really feel like drawing it out myself but it shouldn't be hard at all. Then use the IR data to check/add anything necessary.

>>7710735
haha y

>>7710735
weird seeing a cow in a scientific setting that isn't spherical

yeah the semester after I graduated I didn't study for finals at all

>>7710502
People tend to be confused by the mathematical usage of "simple" and "trivial", assuming they mean "easy."

They don't.

"Trivial", for a proof, can mean a few things.

>It is easy
>That the premises P "trivially" imply the result, because the result Q is always true regardless of the premises (proving that Q is always true, however, may be very much not easy)
>That the proof requires no fundamentally new techniques or mathematical innovations to construct (which also doesn't mean it's easy).

>>7710520
When used by mathematicians, it means "able to be solved", regardless of how many notebooks you need fill up with calculations in order to find the solution.

>>7710588
Not when used right. Frankly, I would never said "the proof is quite trivial" because it's pretty rude and counterproductive to anyone involved, but I've seen it used justifiably before.