Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2092. page

>>7714033
>Implying we aren't right.

>>7714033
They're hardly contrarian opinions. In fact, it's quite common for people to hold those views.

Now....get the fuck out....idiot.

Because they find popsci hype obnoxious and so get retarded in the oppisite direction, and also because they're terrible autists who love feeling like they're smarter than someone else.
That is why.

>>7713784
Medicine isn't a STEM field moron. Learn what STEM actually means.

The 'M' is for medicine, of couse.

>>7713786
Isn't medicine a part of science? Then what is it? Art?

>>7713639
segregation into groups of people like yourself is natural

if you had the choice to be trapped in a room with either a complete stranger or an anon from /sci/ i think most people would choose the random stranger from /sci/ - at least you have one thing in common, you might have other things or be similar to that person.
people of the same race is the most apparent similarity there is - these people look similar to you

>>7713647
> complete stranger or an anon from /sci/ i think most people would choose the random stranger from /sci/

I'd stay the hell away from the anon from /sci/ desu

>>7713650
ugh ok fine lemme use a different analogy

would you rather be trapped in an elevator with a random person from your university or a random 46 year old man from pakistan

Ideal position is upside down in fetal position. Its how you developed in the womb so naturally it should be the best position to maintain for periods of sleep & development. (Most blood will go to the brain)

The right question to ask:
How do we fall asleep in an upside down fetal position comfortably?

That right, we build liquidy tanks where we can either breath the liquid/gel or we reattach a synthetic limbal corb to deliver oxygen.

>>7713622
you turn upside down when you are in the womb and about to be birthed. so the ideal position wouldn't be upside down.

>>7713622
Your spine is underdeveloped in the womb, you'll only end up with back pain trying to sleep in a fetal position, you'll have to remove the spine to get true comfort in the tank

Very true. I remember one of Einsteins colleague and rival. Believed that in order to time travel one does not need to accelerate over the speed of light. We do that with motion, if relativity is respected. But one would have to be still as possible. Everything vibrates. so that is near impossible.

>>7713467
Like in the movie interstellar where a few minutes on the water planet are hours on earth, a few minutes in the location of the server would be years on earth, but instead of traveling physically, we would transmit data through other means.

>>7713446
Why not creating bigass mirror in the space then look with telescope?
we can see the past !

>>7713401
Shouldn't we be able to detect those by the waste heat?

>>7713403
>implying advanced civilizations would waste heat
not with the heat death approaching, son.

>>7713403
>entire energy output of there star
>waist heat

Pick one.

The female anatomy it you catch my meaning

Biology, chemistry and anatomy

Stay on 4chin and study memes

not really sure what you're looking for specifically

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313540300410X

Above is a fairly typical example of what LID research looks like

>>7713132
It's got holes.

>>7713143
>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313540300410X
This looks fantastic, except it costs 36$. Is it possible you could point me to a resource that doesn't have a paywall (a tall order I know, I apologize).

>>7712949
I take it you don't know much about how PCR works. Is this correct?

You need enough DNA to be able to see it on a gel. That's usually exponentially more than you'd find laying around.

>>7712949
well, with one egg I can fry it
with 3 I can fry, hardboil, and poach

File: 1433626312002.png (103KB, 624x434px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 624x434px

>>7712918
>what does /sci/ think about a micro-biology major?
If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/.

>>7712927

Im asking what do you guys think about the field of study, fuck the major what do you think about it as a science, is it respectable?

>>7712918
Dont let sci dictate your opinion on science or major.

Microbiology is good and its a good major.
It is "real" science or whatever that means. Its applications are one of the most useful and its on a new frontier of discovery.

Micro-biology needs good chemistry knowledge tho so dont skip out on those.

Im not sure about biophysics but certainly its applications are equally important, as the field of biotechnology is growing and seems like the way to go.

File: electrical_engineering_master_race.jpg (42KB, 430x300px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 430x300px

no

No, that's actually about the right time.

No, unless you don't have an EE degree from an accredited institution.

>>7712580
most mechanics courses are taught to baby physics majors who have only single variable calc under their belts.

>>7712630
wut?

physics majors don't take mechanics until their junior/senior year and they take multivariable calc their 1st or 2nd year....

>>7712630
It isn't that hard to teach some basic geometric algebra.

File: 1358932497021.png (336KB, 525x551px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 525x551px

>>7712578
>Making millions with cooking methamphetamine but still clinging to your naggy bitch traitor wife and retarded son

File: 1439052189023.gif (89KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 256x256px

>>7712578
>maths is subjective

>>7712578
I want to try it too.
> Logic is relative

I don't get it. What is this?

I tried, but it already goes to fractions at the 20/21 tile of the top left corner, and to be honest I don't believ in fractions so this is not solveable.

ez 33 cm

>>7712420
It is good news, but please don't overhype this. We are still a long way from proving stellarators are definitely more advantageous than tokamaks to produce fusion power. As a physicsfag (and a european), I'm glad to see a frontier science experiment getting so much coverage though. Let's just not get excited too early.

it's nice that its getting exposure, but ionly a matter of time until /sci/ starts shitting on stellarators in favor of FRCs, not like /sci/ really understands either. it will be just like when /sci/ hyped the fuck out of the shitty general fusion design, or ITER before that.

stellarators are based tho, and behind FRCs are one of the best methods of fusion power production

this is the shit and nothing less