Is science today able to explain happiness?
>>7714560
Yes, it correlates negatively with intelligence.
Science is not about explaining, it's about explaining away.
>>7714561
why does happy people stupid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_Tao
Is there really any point in even trying to succeed as an academic in STEM if you aren't a genius? And I dont mean genius in the le iq sense, but in the Newton/Euler/Tao sense.
Seriously, it feels like no matter how hard I work or how passionate I am, I will never be able to be even close to as successful as people like that.
Anyway, my question is can one make any meaningful contributions to STEM fields without being a genius?
every prof i had in college grew up with a professor for a parent
>>7714536
>implying Newton was a genius
I want this meme to stop. Newton was not a genius. He only did highschool math and physics. Calculus is NOT higher math.
>>7714544
le hooky fish face
Does America still have a space program or is it all just dying out now? It seems like the private sector is doing more to push for space than anything else. Maybe it is just the lack of hype and promotion of NASA's space program? Remember when every kid wanted to be an astronaut?
Got any good advancements to share?
>>7714521
There are actually a few government-run or funded programs right now.
Currently, the government's most-publicized program is sending astronauts to asteroids and eventually Mars. The problems with that initiative are many. The Space Launch System won't fly more than once every year in the most optimistic projections, and the majority of components we need to develop (Earth-Mars transit habitat module, Mars lander, Mars habitat, Earth-Mars propulsion) haven't even been budgeted and contracted yet. It's really unworkable under the current budget, and the entire thing is designed to give work to certain congressional districts.
The SLS and Orion flights to asteroids and Mars are just one program, however. NASA is funding commercial manned space flight, and that program shows enormous potential.
Meanwhile, NASA's robotic programs, including space-based observatories, have largely been extremely successful and have well-planned, feasible outlines for the future. By 2050, it's planned that NASA will image the surfaces of exoplanets, which will revolutionize astronomy.
So, yes, America has a few diversified and promising programs. It's just that the political nature of NASA forces the agency to take on some not-so-promising, extremely dead-end initiatives. And, even more dangerously, those dead ends are the programs that attract the most hype. It ought be reversed.
But, certainly, the progress in private space flight owes much to NASA both in the lessons companies have taken from NASA's past and the critical funding NASA gives commercial efforts today.
>>7714588
idk about you but I am pretty hype for the James Webb. That's run by Nasa isn't it?
>>7714588
Damn, I wish there was more funding for this stuff. Like enough to send 3 rockets up per month and developing methods to make it easier to get mass off planet.
Whats better EE or mech??
shut the fuck up
Maths
>>7714365
I've been on campus for four months and haven't seen those jackets, are they actually a thing?
http://wap.engadget.com/2015/12/09/google-we-have-proof-that-our-quantum-computer-really-works/
>Google announced a breakthrough in the field of quantum computing Wednesday. The company thinks it's found a quantum algorithm that solves problems 100 million times faster than conventional processes. If confirmed, this discovery could not only lead to iRobot-style artificial intelligence but also advance the US space program by light years.
Will we see consumer products with this sort of technology in it within our lifetime? Or, are we doomed to be 1 generation too late to see it?
interesting. i hope we're not too late.
>>7714208
How is this going to advance our space program?
>>7714216
In every single way possible. But, I guess we'd have to actually have a space program to advance in order to actually advance it.
Could information move faster than light?
Through space, no.
>>7713911
yes. for example, just take a stick with the length of the distance from earth to mars. when you now move the stick, you can communicate from earth to mars faster than the speed of light.
>>7713917
>take a stick with the length of the distance from earth to mars
No. I can't believe this idea still comes up.
Communication via "rigid" stick is much, much slower than light.
ASTRONOMERS BTFO
\SCI\ BTFO
THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD BTFO
http://www.forbes.com/sites/briankoberlein/2015/12/10/astronomers-find-new-object-possible-super-earth-in-our-solar-system/
>>7713150
Chill the fuck out. Scientists know barely anything about this.
>>7713150
Phew, I was worried Nibiru wasn't showing up
Nemesis!
Do you think is ok that some students fail science and engineering courses just because the made some algebra or arithmethic mistake on some test and teachers doesn't care to check if they understand the concepts just follow recipes and follow procedures?
>>7713040
>Do you think is ok that some students fail science and engineering courses
Yes. Scientists and engineers need to calculate values.
For mathematics, no. You should never be allowed to use a calculator in the first place and if you make a sign error or whatever you go back and fix it.
If you make a king armor under false assumptions that it'll solve the arrow problem when it doesn't, the king will fucking kill you.
"Oh yes, I got it right." No you didn't.
Dead blacksmith.
>>7713068
>You should never be allowed to use a calculator in the first place.
I'm talking about university math, not your high school problems.
/sci/ you tell me that STEM is a meme and you can't get jobs.
So tell me this, /sci/, why aren't any of you becoming actuaries?
>>7711935
Because it has math and math sucks cause MURICA & FREEDOM.
>>7711935
because i want a job that wont make me suicidal by the age of 30
>>7711935
what is an actuary
What would you do in this situation?
>>7717019
Obviously not let him in.
>>7717019
Teach that alien asshole The Kzinti Lesson.
>>7717019
Force the other Ramirez into the airlock and jettison him out so they can have a space-wrestling match.
Winner gets to watch the fire rise.
I need to get 52% on my Organic Chemistry final to pass the class
I got 43% on the midterm and have not studied since, only mindlessly took notes (very good notes though)
I have 2 full days (7am-12pm) + 3 hours today to study for everything
how fucked am i
>>7716785
very. mindlessly taking notes instead of paying attention and learning is retarded
>>7716785
you might get a 50
Probably, I know when I took organic chem the final was much more difficult than the midterm. There's a chance is you religiously study the reactions and their mechanisms
how do solve it?
just integrate three times and you're done
[math] f\left( x \right) = \prod\limits_{n = 0}^\infty {\left( {1 + {x^{{4^n}}}} \right)} [/math]
>>7716751
Find the convergence value of the function when x = 3/8. insert that into the next function then flip
http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-the-moon-landings/
http://blackbag.gawker.com/did-stanley-kubrick-fake-this-video-of-stanley-kubrick-1747558774
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/626119/MOON-LANDINGS-FAKE-Shock-video-Stanley-Kubrick-admit-historic-event-HOAX-NASA
This got me thinking.
How can we here right now find things left on the Moon from those missions? There's still a Rover up there and landing
What size telescope do I need to actually focus in on objects left behind and see them for myself? My shitty one I bought for $50 just isn't going to cut it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artificial_objects_on_the_Moon
The largest object on the moon seems to be "Apollo 15 S-IVB" located at 1.51°S 11.81°W is it even on the Earth side of the moon?
It's too small. You would need a telescope about 200 meters with sophisticated Adaptive Optics in diameter just to resolve the LM as a pixel.
>>7716671
You can't because its all fake and Earth is flat. Don't believe their lies!
Since medicine is science, I thought I'd ask this question here. Do you sci bros think there might be corruption or doctors with bad intentions in the medical field? I always think of doctors as the people with the highest integrity in society without shred of bad intention in them - except for plastic surgeons. What do you guys think?
>>7716622
>I always think of doctors as the people with the highest integrity in society without shred of bad intention in them
PFFFTTTAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Top lel. Top lel m8-T! This made my day.
>>7716622
>I always think of doctors as the people with the highest integrity in society without shred of bad intention in them
>>7716622
jew doctors are the biggest drain on the us healthcare system
What is the superior engineering major and why?
The one you like and are good at.
>engineering
>>7716486
This basically. You kind of have to be able to get excited about your field. I constantly find myself thinking "wow this stuff is so Fucking cool ". I think if you have that you can be great in any engineering field.