How do I go about grasping the concept of 4-Dimensional females (biological) as well as perceiving them within my mind?
Also what qualities would they have? How would they interact with us?
Assuming you share a similar believe the following: [ 2D > 3D > 1D ]
Would the totem pole be non-transitive or continue to appear as transitive? Apologies in advance if any these are obvious questions. I'm kind of new at this whole "mathes" thing.
>>8426860
You would have to hold the female in your mind at all stages of her development, from womb to coffin at least. The ends of the timeline would be kind of arbitrary; it's hard to say why a when should or even could be chosen, other than you'd also have to hold all of creation in your mind, because it contains the particles that will one day and once were your female of choice.
That photograph is actually as much 2D as is that cartoon picture next to it.
>>8426871
How can the 3D figure exist as a 2D figure if 2D doesn't exist as a concrete thing, but only a mathematical and logical abstract?
The theory of something in a system (a unified field theory)
In the beginning (and at the end ) there is 1 singularity in a field called space-information'
it is the first and last black hole. Time ceases to exist in a static field (0 motion = 0 time)
The singularity contains all the atoms (only protons,) dark matter (behavior information, the singularities "DNA")
neutrinos and the fundamental forces of gravity, electromagnetism, weak/strong nuclear forces.
After billions of years post big-bang, order to disorder (energy) in space-time, entropy sets in as black holes unite forcing
the creation of singularities, disorder to order (dark energy) in space-information.
Dark energy increases and accelerates the expansion of the space-time/info field as more information is collected and
contained in the "quantum world" where time is not a factor, all sub-atomic particles of the standard model are co-variant
in space-information's "architecture."
Energy travels in waves at (c) with time permutations in a "real" field/system.
Dark Energy travels in straight lines at (c) without time permutations in an "imaginary" field/system.
Creation and expansion in nature follows the golden ratio.
x(ϕ^(-ϕ) i ϕ) = 1 Fig 1
y=(0.618033988750^(-1.618033988750) x 0.618033988750)+x(0.618033988750^(-1.618033988750) x 0.618033988750)
y=(0.618033988750^(-1.618033988750) * x * 0.6180339887500) ^ 2
{Re(ϕ^(-ϕ) i ϕ), (l m) (ϕ^(-ϕ) i ϕ)} Fig 2
{-Im(ϕ^(1-ϕ)), i lm ϕ^(1-ϕ)}
>>8426678
put the heroin needle down you mong
>>8426695
So what you're saying is this theory is incorrect? Why?
>>8426678
this, is mathematically proven.
any objections?
I'm curious, are there any neurological diseases that cause dependence on other people, and how would said disease be treated?
>>8426647
Unrequited love. Unfortunately there is no cure. It will eventually lead to death by suicide.
>>8426647
All diseases that make you handicapped will make you dependent on other people. For example MS, ALS, dementia, stroke, etc etc.
>>8426972
This. Still alive because of porn and math
what does /sci/ think about calculus?
what about this chain rule bullshit?
>>8426636
What is your question pleb?
>>8426636
calculus is more useful than your tiny brain could imagine.
the chain rule is true.
saged
>>8426651
>pleb
I bet you don't even speak Latin.
My question is laid out simply. What do you think of calculus?
Has this man truly solved youtube science videos?
No one else comes close
https://youtu.be/pzuHxL5FD5U
>>8426515
I didn't know Tim Heidecker and Elmer Fudd had a kid
>>8426528
The content is better than anything else I've seen on youtube.
https://youtu.be/rDPj5zI66LA
can two different numbers have the same power n? if so what would n have to be? can this be proven/disproven?
>>8426492
x^n = y^n
where x =/= y
Is that what you mean? Not in the reals, my dude.
>>8426497
1^0 = 1
2^0 = 1
>>8426497
w e w
e w e
w e w
l a d
a d l
d l a
What are some really soft sciences like anthropology and sociology?
>>8426480
your dick-thropology
>>8426480
Engineering
Hey guys, what's you're IQ?
[guaranteed replies]
690km
>>8426398
how long did you spend shopping that - just to give it to me for free?
*
**
***
****
*****
******
*******
********
*********
**********
My little brother in high school is in CS and needs to make a while loop that prints that out, I told him I'd help as I took the class myself but I'm a lot rustier than I remember. His teacher said it only needs 2 whiles
You do one big while which will go from line to line and in that loop you put another while which prints a line.
After each smaller loop, add 1 to the variable that contains the lenght of a line.
Think of the computer as a third-world sweatshop worker given a box with two buttons 'print *' and 'print newline'. He can follow instructions, count, and can remember things, but that's about it.
1) what is the sequence of buttons you need him to press?
2) how would you explain this sequence to him in a completely unambiguous way?
>>8426241
>non-CS majors
I just got out of a Statics Exam and this question tripped me up hard. I had a very good idea of what I was doing but I'm not sure if I did it right.
It was given that the turning over point is when the Normal Force at A is equal to 0 which makes conceptual sense.
Can the anons of /sci/ help me to solve this problem to see if I performed the right process during my exam?
2500*9.8-W*((3+12)*cos(30)-8.4)=your IQ
>>8426146
If that 9.8 is the acceleration due to gravity then it is you who is the brainlet
>>8426136
are you retarded?
This shit really scare me.
What is the possibility that one comes close to our solar system?
Should I fear this happen? do not know why, but lately it has given me afraid.
pic related, black hole.
>>8426126
Yes, you should fear that shit. It's the only place in the universe where time stops being a thing. You quite possibly could literally go through the process of dying forever dude, we don't know.
We could detect the gravitational influence of an actual black hole, and it'd probably be floating around like a tiny planet in the vast void of space.
>implying black holes are spooky
Now, I really fear the random gamma ray bursts that just happen when stars die, or black holes in the centers of galaxies are firing high energy radiation in our direction.
Well, I guess, black holes are scary if you look at them like that.
>got me there
But it's indirect
>>8426126
Why are you afraid ?
What math do you need for social science?
Calculus, real analysis, linear algebra, differential equations, stochastic processes, stats (hypothesis testing, time series, bayesian methods, regression and classification), game theory, optimization, graph theory and what else?
>>8426125
social science?
applied statistics. math for liberal arts. that's about it.
That's pretty much it, but most of this is used in econ and barely touched upon in other social sciences.
>>8426125
All you really need to do proper social science is a firm understanding of basic applied statistics (and of course all the basic prerequisite math to learn stats).
You don't need anything fancy, just enough to draw accurate conclusions from data
>tag cancer cells with some indicator(protein or something)
>engineer cells that only kill other cells that have that indicator
>cancer is cured
Literally why is this so hard? I'll wait for the pretentious bio/chem/eng majors and the fantastic excuse they will come up with.
Nothing like having billions of dollars going into the research and coming up with absolutely nothing.
If math got that much money a year we would figure this out
>>8426094
>Why is this so hard?
You have outed yourself as an idea guy
>>8426094
Cell engineering has only been possible since few weeks ago with the CAS9 discovery.
>>8426094
>If math got that much money a year we would figure this out
Correction: You'd start naming anatomies a bunch of jargon and only focus on being as useless as possible
How do you become a master at drawing notation and figures often used in maths?
Like those curly brackets.
>>8425886
like pic related senpai
draw a long tall "S" then a backwards one under it
reverse for closed bracket
>>8425904
but the hard part is the backwards one
>Have hypothesis
>Don't know enough mathematics yet to attempt to validate my hypothesis using empirically proven data
>If correct, my hypothesis may allow cold fusion to be achieved
Should I bring in a mathematician or just study more mathematics? Because while having sole credit for this achievement would be amazing, I would rather get it proven before someone else proves it.
>>8425852
Just stop what you're doing and get a job at Starbucks.
>>8425852
>empirically proven data
>bring in a mathematician
you have no idea what you're talking about. I hope you're just an idiot, and not someone shitposting for fun.
>>8425896
The raw data exists thanks to the meticulous research of others. I just have to process the right sets of data using the right procedures to prove or disprove the existence of something. It's statistics + calculus, but my calculus is shoddy since I'm only through cal2.