>Have hypothesis >Don't know enough mathematics yet

>>8425852
Just stop what you're doing and get a job at Starbucks.

>>8425852
>empirically proven data
>bring in a mathematician

you have no idea what you're talking about. I hope you're just an idiot, and not someone shitposting for fun.

>>8425896

The raw data exists thanks to the meticulous research of others. I just have to process the right sets of data using the right procedures to prove or disprove the existence of something. It's statistics + calculus, but my calculus is shoddy since I'm only through cal2.

>>8425946
>I'm only through cal2.
>invented an alternative for cold fusion

i get that you were the smartest kid in high school and are smarter than most of your classmates but the fact that you seriously believe this to be possible makes you a total fucking idiot

>How can I selectively pull data from flawed sources to prove my crackpot theories?

I dunno anon, you're on your own as far as Im concerned

File: andrearossi4.jpg (19KB, 609x480px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 609x480px

>mfw already unlocked the secrets of cold fusion to do my dark Italian bidding.

>>8425852
Just press your fingers really hard together

you did not create an idea for cold fusion. stop trying to be a smart ass do further mathematics then cry then go to 16 years of school, then come and tel us how you think cold fusion could be accomplished. (on my way with that atm more physics than math but yes )

>>8425958

Anything is possible anon. Not believing that makes you the idiot ;)

>>8426199

What is your physics based idea?

I feel you op. I figured out a way to reduce an open conjecture to an equivalent but simpler case, I just don't know how to prove it because I don't know enough analysis/number theory

>>8425852
My friend Steve wrote Unlimited Math works and made up a theorem called "Steve's Gambit" to finish a question in mocks for A-level Pure Math

Try the same

>>8425946
>It's statistics

So get a statistician