Is the whole human induced 'sixth mass extinction' a bit of an overreaction?
I sort of feel that scientists who suggest it might be guided a bit by ideology as opposed to facts...
Firstly, how does one define an applicable point of stasis to compare against, and why the obsession with classifying human/environment interaction as unnatural?
>>8433578
> and why the obsession with classifying human/environment interaction as unnatural?
What are you stupid? Becaue if "unnatural" is to have any meaning whatsoever its "things humans do"
>>8433594
But that's just it, nothing about humans is unnatural.
Bare in mind scientific are unironically defining 'natural' as an arbitrary point in history. I.e. everything before was natural and all change after is unnatural or anthropogenic.
>>8433651
Nonsense, the difference is in self awareness. A lion can not recognize it will run out of Gazelles to eat if it consumes more than they reproduce
In this thread we learn Mathematical Analysis 1.
Textbook: I'll be using Pic Related , recommendations are welcome
1.7 Definition: Suppose S is an ordered set, and [math]E \subset S[/math]. If there exists a [math]\beta \subset S[/math] such that [math]x \leq \beta[/math] for every [math]x \in E[/math], we say that E is bounded above, and call [math]\beta[/math] an upper bound of E.
Just testing.
>>8433376
1.8 Definition: Suppose S is an ordered set, [math]E \subset S[/math] and [math]E[/math] is bounded above. Suppose there exists an [math]\alpha \in S[/math] with the following properties:
(i) [math]\alpha[/math] is an upper bound of E.
(ii) If [math]\gamma < \alpha[/math] then [math]\gamma[/math] is not an upper bound of E.
Then [math]\alpha[/math] is called the least upper bound of [math]E[/math] or supremum.
We write: [math]\alpha = \sup E[/math]
The greatest lower bound, or infimum, of a set which is bounded below is defined in the same manner and written as:
[math]\alpha = \inf E[/math]
1.10 Definition: An ordered set [math]S[/math] is said to have the least-upper-bound property if the following is true:
If [math]E \subset S[/math], [math]E[/math] is not empty, and [math]E[/math] is bounded above, then [math]\sup E[/math] exists in [math]S[/math]
The universe didn't explode from a single point, it contracted AWAY from a single point, like a pin prick in stretched sheet of black nylon. That's why it is speeding up, and that's why debris was left behind.
Thoughts?
Wow dude. Nobody in the history of the universe had thought of this before. You are a literal Einstein with unmatched creativity.
Nice thinking I like this idea
>>8433300
And yet a professor at my university told me that this idea was inconclusively explored once, by select physicists, about 20 years ago...
What order do you think math should be learned in?
arithemtic
and then functional analysis
1. Euclid's Elements
something like this
can someone walk me through how sqrt(17/2) can be turned into sqrt(34)/2? i'm in calc 2, yet little shit like this confounds me.
sqrt(17/2)
sqrt(34/4)
sqrt(34)/sqrt(4)
sqrt(34)/2
sqrt(17/2)
= sqrt(17) / sqrt(2)
[sqrt(17) / sqrt(2)] * [sqrt(2) / sqrt(2)]
= [sqrt(17) * sqrt(2)] / 2
= sqrt(17 * 2) / 2
= sqrt(34) / 2
Is this the most retarded thing humanity has ever done?
>>8432801
t. brainlet
>>8432801
Yes. Because it is unlikely that a non-human would even know what the fuck it means.
pepe with a big blue dick jizzing on an indian who is sitting in a corn field. Maybe the purple thing is a beatle trying to catch all the rundown cum? idk
I was thinking about how an intelligent species that lives underwater could develop technology when I realised how important trees were for us. Think about it: wood is light as fuck, strong as fuck, and is easier to process than stone or metals. Basic weapons like spears, bows and arrows all need wood to be constructed, without wood all you have are throwing stones. You can make houses from wood orders of magnitude faster than you can from stone. The first vehicles were also made of wood. Wood is good fuel available in vast quantities, without it a species may not even progress into the bronze age. Hell, many houses built today and most furniture is still made of wood, even though we have all these fancy synthetic materials. So what if the reason for the great silence is that tree-like plants (plants that are tall, therefore also rigid) are unlikely to evolve?
>>8432638
At first I though it would be another stupid meme about photosynthesis and CO2, but this is interesting. Was it ever researched ?
>>8432638
In some planets, the trees gain sentience, and live happily in harmony.
The silence is because humanity is an aberration and all other planets are content within themselves.
>>8432647
Well I have found this blog post, but no scholarly articles.
http://stanericksonsblog.blogspot.hu/2015/07/the-great-filter-trees.html
>>8432664
kek
Do you wonder if Hard Sciences and Mathematics is a debt trap for the ultra smart people, and is setup by the elite who do not want them to start businesses and get rich with the exception of those like Elon Musk?
I mean, you need to get a PHD in physics to even qualify for a entry level job that actually earns Money. And this is DEBT. And you are WORKING For SOMEONE ELSE, NOT YOURSELF.
You don't need a PHD. Just walk up to your future employer, look him square in the eye, and give him a firm handshake.
>>8432264
>he thinks having lot's of money correlates with high intelligence
Lemme guess, you measure the world's worth by the financial worth? In reality, most really smart people are working away at real shit and earning decent money but not wasting time with business and popsci.
So since yesterday I've been thinking about that paradox, short story long, I got to the conclusion that the cat will die / survive instantly just because the cat is an spectator itself. Could it be?
>>8432243
No, because the cat has no consciousness.
>>8432243
Have you actually read up on the topic? It's an example of superpositions. A cat doesn't interact with an unstable isotope
>>8432243
You missed the point. And most pop-sci that brings it up also misses the point, so I guess it is forgivable. The point Schrodinger was making is this: superpositions are stupid because they let stupid shit like my cat thought experiment happen on macroscopic scales. Luckily for quantum mechanics, Bohr came along and went "No it doesn't! Superposition states generally off at a rate proportional to the size of the system and so macroscopic objects can't be in a superposition state for any meaningful length of time!"
[This, of course, ignores some actual macroscopic states, like topological liquids and superfluids/superconducting states, but these are special circumstances that manage to get around the "general" rules]
How the heck do i solve this? My teacher gave me this without explaining anything, i need the absolute value.
Thanks in advance.
>>8432054
absolute values are dumb, just remove it and solve it normally
>>8432084
I don't think it works like that, aren't you supposed to have more than one solution?
>>8432054
Solve it using |x| = x and |x| = -x
Heyo sci!
how awesome is python?! seriously! I've learned some matlab, but python can do the same better and much more beyond.
that being said, when doing math with python and creating math plots, which library would you recommend to learn first or have learnt first?
numpy or scipy (don't say matplotlib)?
(also what's with the sin(pi) not being equal to zero?! pic related)
>>8431984
I fucking love Python. Clear syntax and powerful!
public static void main String(args[])
System.out.println("Java is gay")
or...
print("Python FTW")
If it weren't for enterprise bullshit and Android, that horrific language could just die in peace
>>8431984
>(also what's with the sin(pi) not being equal to zero?! pic related)
floating point, nigga. like 0.1 + 0.2 = .30000000000000001
>>8431984
scipy or numpy? Neither, MATLAB!
What is the greatest thing science has taught us?
the nihilistic nature of morality
>>8431860
Human beings are just psychotic apes with delusions of grandeur
That we know nothing and most of us don't even care
Is architecture a good career choice? It looks like a good mix of art and science, seems creatively satisfying, can lead to other possible design opportunities
>>8431792
>architecture
>science
Pick one.
>>8431792
Only if you go to top 5 schools.
Other then that, no.
Also, I would recommend studying civil engineering for undergrad and architecture for masters
My dad is an architect and throughout my lifetime he's subtly implied that architecture should be your last career choice if you want a satisfying job and no stress.
Why do people romanticize pseudo-intellectualism and mock and trivialize STEM?
Why is OP such a faggot and why won't he stop posting shit threads?
>>8431783
Because assholes like you think STEM is like the only thing that matters in the world.
Let people study whatever they like and stop being a pretentious cunt.
Because being pseudo-intellectual is fun. I used to be a STEM sperg but due to my high intelligence I got bored and dropped out.
Given any six natural numbers, show that there must be two, say m and n, with difference
m − n divisible by 5.
On first look it seems like a pigeonhole principal question, but im not really sure how to structure it if it is, I have trivial part completed > "If all the elements in the set are the same then its trivial, the difference between any combination of numbers is x-x = 0 which is always divisible by 5"
thanks in advance guys
bump
>>8431758
>consider all numbers mod 5
>apply pigeonhole principle
>>8431809
I know that has something to do with it but when it comes to applinyg ph principal i go potato, can you walk me through this