Why don't these popsci fags actually tell normies that physics and the stem sciences are highly formalized mathematical fields?
>>8485982
to that I give credit to Dawkins who says "fun" in science is overrated and that science is hard but it's worth it
>>8485982
because its not
>>8485982
How did Kaku get so popular? He's a nut who was a frequent guest on Art Bell's show talking about aliens coming to Earth through wormholes. Does he actually do any physics or just bounce from one TV show to the next for a paycheck?
ITT We guess what theoryfags will say about emdrive actually working
>The dark momentum
>MemeDrive Particles
>EmDrive's uncertainty principle
>Microwave matter
>The dark thrust
>>8485860
>Let's stay calm until other groups will eventually show an error in the experimental setup and confirm that it was a load of implausible bullshit after all, just like the FTL neutrinos a few years back.
I like this new meme I want in on it.
>Breaking News: Einstein discovered meme drive 60 years ago in uncovered paper!
>Einstein's Special Mass Theory
Just
You
Wait
They won't let some garage meme guy become Newtown 2.0
Water never flows uphill.
On a ball earth, how is it possible to have levels since everything has a relative high point in elevation?
Why doesn't sea water flow into rivers or rivers move upstream?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4CLJA9z8Zck
>>8485664
I don't understand some aspects of your post.
>since everything has a relative high point in elevation
are you suggesting there is no point of global max elevation?
also this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltwater_intrusion
but the matter is more complex than mere elevation
>>8485673
Yes. Rivers should flow uphill since elevation is irrelevant.
Secondly seawater intrusion is caused by groundwater extraction, but sea water seperates itself from freshwater.
Still doesn't prove why oceans do not flow in rivers naturally and why fresh water lakes are not contaminated naturally inland.
>>8485684
>elevation is irrelevant.
good luck with your thread
I'm nearly finished Patrick Winston's lecture series on Machine Learning and it's fucking amazing. Any other recommendations from the MIT playlists or elsewhere?
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnvKubj2-I2LhIibS8TOGC42xsD3-liux
>>8485639
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-006-introduction-to-algorithms-fall-2011/
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-041sc-probabilistic-systems-analysis-and-applied-probability-fall-2013/
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-002-circuits-and-electronics-spring-2007/
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-042j-mathematics-for-computer-science-spring-2015/
Harvard has an excellent probability course.
http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/stat110/home
>>8485745
Thank you for this, anon.
>>8485745
Cheers cobber. That'll be some great viewing.
I'm doing Honours in a BSc (Geology) degree, focusing on Hydrogeology because it's rad, but love learning about all this other stuff too.
If something has a pressure of x pounds per square inch, would the pounds of pressure exerted on a millimeter be greater or less the pressure exerted on an inch?
>>8485616
>square inch
>a millimeter
no
use 'dimensional analysis' to convert from sq in to sq mm
>>8485616
Pressure does not change with area
>>8485620
The pounds arent stated, so this is a theoretical anyhow. Also is there a measurement for smaller than an inch in the imperial system anyhow?
>when someone says they study computer science
>>8485489
Well memed. But seriously though, how long until the field is completely over saturated?
>>8485683
given that 80% give up, a few hundred years
>When someone says math majors earn more than Com. scientists
I know there is a lot of criticism of Wildbergers philosophy on number theory and his recent Goldbach conjecture disproof embarrassment.
However, does his "Rational Trigonometry" business have merit or is that another meme?
>>8485449
genius at work
>>8485449
He's just another fedora
>>8485449
Rational trig is the only way to do trig.
Euclid would be proud.
Just how deadly is an electron gun?
Depends on the speed it shots
>>8485388
For you
Could the universe be one giant virtual particle?
According to the string theory, it’s possible for two universes to collide in a multiverse. Could it be possible that universe filled with dark energy/ antimatter is permeating into ours? If I imagine the universe as a soap bubble colliding with an inverse-soap bubble, could it be possible for the two to collide on the n-th dimension and burst and/or disappear? Black holes could be our universe being inhaled by a gravitational wormhole into the other universe, and virtual particles or dark energy could be the anti-universe’s osmosis into ours. I’m not sure if this even obeys physics, but what are we?
What if we are the anti-particle?
>>8485376
>according to the string theory
no
woah bro I love science now
wtf I hate science now!
Is there anything wrong with feeding a one month old baby a lollipop? How will affect the baby?
>>8485352
other than choking on it?
>>8485352
i wouldn't feed him a whole lollipop, but letting him have a taste probably wont hurt.
he will choke. if you hold it and let him try it tho no problem
Now that the dust has settled, which engineering major is superior?
Master race electrical engineering reporting in.
Mechatronic Master race.
At least I hope because that's what I'm studying.
Aeronautical engineering mustard race reporting in
Mechanical reporting in.
Humor me /sci/.
So what we see in the sky is really the past. Stars that are billions of years old, most probably long gone.
So is there an area in the universe where one can see the big bang (or as close to realistically being able to see it as possible)?
If not, was there a time where if intelligent life existed they may have been able to observe it? (and then possibly document it for us to learn about in the future).
Also what is the theoretically earliest time we could "time travel" to, considering the universe was at one point way too small for us to even fit inside, and also just at some point a big ball of heat too hot for us to handle.
Also then I wonder what WOULD happen if you were to time-travel to a point where the universe was too small to fit you? Would you being extended outside the universe? Would the borders of your body become the new borders of the universe as the term "universe" is realitve? Would you be in multiple universes at once? Would your matter condense down with the universe to join that infinitely dense point?
This topic fascinates me endlessly.
>the term universe is relative
nigga wat
>>8484856
I mean think about it. What defines the "universe"? Does the universe have a border? And end? Is the universe a term for the area that matter occupies within an arbitrary nothingness? Or is the universe everything including that nothingness?
>>8484871
I'm really asking here by the way. Usually a brainlet /fit/izen but have been trying to educate myself and this subject in particular I want to know more about.
How does one fix their depression and anxiety if both are a byproduct of their high intellect?
If you were intelligent you would be too successful to be depressed and anxious.
if preserving intellect is no item, then drink lead paint.
You don't know what the cause is. It could be due to a dysfunctional thyroid for all your dumb ass knows.
Will we have fully immersive vr in my lifetime
>>8484816
No, because you will die tomorrow
>>8484816
The minimum is 10 years. The medium is 20 years. The max is 40 years.
Honestly with the successful launch of PlayStation VR and other pushes you may have to wait 15 years
>>8484816
Easier to go to a cave and only get out when you are able to properly allucinate your waifu 100% tham to wait years for the tech.
The brain is the ultimate illusion machine after all.
Hello /sci/,
we all know there are continuous but non differentiable. And we even know they form a dense subset for the [math] ||.||_{ \infty} [/math] norm.
But what I want to know is a little more tricky : is there a continous and differentiable function [math] f [/math] but with [math] f' [/math] continous nowhere ?
>>8484804
>continous and differentiable
This is redundant.
Regarding your question, if a function is differentiable then set of points where the derivative of said function is continuous is non-empty.
This is obvious if you approach it by contradiction.
Suppose you have a function that is differentiable on the interval (a.b) such that its derivative is not continuous in any point of (a.b)
Any discontinuity on this derivative would imply a sudden change in the original function and through some more rigorous analysis you would get that your original function is actually not differentiable anywhere in (a.b), which strongly contradicts the hypothesis.
>>8484827
B...B...But there are differentiable functions which verifies the following proporties :
- the set of points where the derivative is positive is dense
- the set of points where the derivative is negative is dense
>>8484804
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1444138/differentiable-functions-such-that-the-derivative-is-nowhere-continuous