Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1204. page

I think you're just looking too much into things anon.

No but there's is one causing you to see patterns where there aren't
Hint: it has 6 letters in the name

>>8480926
Pareidolia has 10 letters retard

> elevating from the simulation into the real world

That might not be possible. For all we know the universe simulating ours is two dimensional.

>>8480773
>elevating
You have a very primitive view of everything, don't you.

>>8480773

thats like saying bring a computer game character in your ps4 into reality. i dont understand. youll have to explain how that would work

Radicals rarely ever terminate, you can't.

rationalize it you dummy
1/sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2

>>8480706
what if you have to find the derivative of radicals and it's in implicit form?

>>8480600
It's called this right now on the internet.

>>8480600
Make clones from her DNA, you can spawn endless young Lindsay Lohans ;)))

Hnnnnnnnñg

Гayc

Gay-us

>>8480460
gauB

Weed makes everyone have "revelations". You're not unique, or correct in your new thoughts. It's just what it does mate

>>8480454
>degrees in a circle: 360
>cicumference of the earth: 40 075 km

For a building to have a 1 degree tilt, it would need to be 40 075km/360 = 111 km away.

>>8480454
>DUDE WEED LMAO XD
Time to leave puberty behind kiddo

Op here, this is the arxiv paper by Verlinde.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02269

Give it a read /sci/

File: bulletcluster_comp_f2048.jpg (520KB, 2048x1480px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 2048x1480px

No, no he hasn't. Aside from the problems on the gravity side of his claims his proposed model doesn't explain key observations of dark matter.

He solves only static solution to derive dark matter like behaviour for a galaxy disk and a relaxed galaxy cluster. Other modified gravities have gotten that far in the past, it will surprise no one that some new complicated model can. What it doesn't do is dynamic situations like the formation of large scale structure and the Bullet Cluster. No modified gravity has explained the Bullet Cluster without dark matter and he hasn't now.

Dispute his claims to the media his paper contains only optimism that dynamic solutions will be found. He has not unseated dark matter yet until pic related is explained. I don't think that will happen any time soon nor do I think he will do it.

>>8480394
Despite*

Wtf haha

File: barbedspear.jpg (11KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 540x360px

>>8480169
no, this is.

>>8480175

Works for me everytime

Gets those little fuckers out of my ass permanently

cos^2(a*x)=(cos(2*a*x)+1)/2
=1/2+(1/2)*cos(2*a*x)
IOW, G(f)=1/2 if f=0 or f=a/pi and 0 otherwise.

>>8480134
>non-formal knowledge of integral calculus.

Anon, there's no easy way to say this, other than you should sit down and read about integral calculus.

http://freebookcentre.net/Mathematics/Fourier-Analysis-Books.html

Here's a good list of free books on fourier analysis.

>>8480134
You need to know integral calculus to use the Fourier transform in a naive way, but to understand Fourier theory you will need at least linear algebra and analysis.

To find the transform of that function, and to "figure out" the Fourier transform simply apply the formula (note that there are several equivalent ways of taking the transform).

[math]\mathcal{F}(f)_{k} = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)e^{-ikx}dx[/math]

>>8480094
I have no idea but at least I can tell you that I'm kind of sure that 4chan is not the perfect site for such a question.

Very cute cat though.

>>8480094
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Phase_velocities_above_c
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Group_velocities_above_c

>>8480156
Well I thought /sci/ WAS the right place

>A relative measure of the degree of rotation from one line segment to another

You run into the same road blocks as you would defining any "basic" object and you usually rely on some axiom of measure. This is not exactly some big deal

>>8479968
It's why real geometers use turn, spread, cross, and twist.

>>8479952
Is topology the new quantum mechanics?
Topological consciousness when?

Topology refers to human over thinking

>>8479952
>Topology
>Topos = surface
>Logos = understanding/ conciousness

Are you implying that surfaces dont exist? Or that we cant try to understand them?

>>8479931
Find a way to isolate and store conciousness, if that's even possible.

until scientist find a way to stop cells from decompose

Nanobots that repair telomeres

File: Additive-subtractive-mixing.jpg (44KB, 525x270px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 525x270px

light (photons) is additive because of how our eyes/brains process it (eg RGB pixels from a monitor can make many colors)

red light coming from deeper in skin, green light coming from top layer of skin, so you'd see yellow

but if you mix actual physical pigments (bulk phase), what happens is their absorbance regions overlap until there is no wavelengths of visibile light that they transmit. so basically there are an "infinite" amount of molecules all absorbing different EM bands, and there is no photons that make it to your eyes, so you see black.

when you take paints that appear black and smear them across a white surface, often times you will see their constituent colors come out because suddenly theres more of molecule A than B, so some color not fully absorbed by B gets through.

File: wst_environmental_lesson02_activity1_image1.jpg (37KB, 406x305px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 406x305px

>>8479762
here's an example of black ink spread out using TLC

File: color64-DIJON.jpg (104KB, 372x502px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 372x502px

>>8479780
So - if i understand it correctly - light would "come back" yellow, but because it has to travel "through" layer of molecules it would come back as slightly darker (depending on amount of light i'm shining)?

(Cont)
Thus by skewing an aperture cut you can always make the core a square. And solving for other rectangles of the aperture cut you'll find the only possible side lengths that result in a shared area are phi (1.618) and 1/phi. Further solving for the side lengths of a mutation requires at least one to have a length of 0 or for one to have a different area which is not permissible. It is impossible to split a rectangle without a bisection or a core and thus the only methods for splitting a rectangle result in
1 a shared side length
2 an irrational side length
3 at least one rectangle with a different area
So that should cover everything. Did I miss anything.

I suppose for clarity I should mention multi cored rectangles and nested cores

>multi cored
Refers to a cut with 2 or more cores. and this retains the same irrational side length problem

>nested core
Should be self explanatory

Not enough math symbols.

Post it on math stackexchange, overflow, or /r/maths.