[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 532. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: canon powershot.jpg (8KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
canon powershot.jpg
8KB, 225x225px
Got a new canon powershot sx50 for crimbus, any opinions on the camera from an experienced photographer
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2731562
bridge cameras are shit, but if you're good, you can still take okay photos in good light, with a great subject
>>
>>2731562
You will need a bunch of film canisters for it. Also be careful not to expose the mirrors to direct sunlight.
It's an okay camera if you learn to properly use it.
>>
>>2731563
this

waste of money imo OP

File: styles.jpg (81KB, 620x524px) Image search: [Google]
styles.jpg
81KB, 620x524px
So I got one of these Konstrucktor DIY film
cameras

Great little build, very excited to use it but I've only ever used a DSLR.

Any advice for a film novice.??


Also anyone have one of these cameras and whats your opinion or share some shots

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2013:06:13 08:44:26
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width620
Image Height524
11 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2731548
I got one for christmas as well
It's a fun little toy

One problem I've had was that the film counter doesn't work properly and it seems to tear the sprocket holes.

Anyways I wouldn't use this for any serious shots, maybe at a party or something. Take fun pictures and then print them out and hand it to people the day after or something.
>>
>>2731548
They're great for decoration. Not for taking pictures. The point of the Konstruktor is to be entertaining when you're building it, not to actually be a functional camera.

Buy a cheap Zenit for $5 and have some fun shooting.
>>
>>2731560

Thats interesting cause my film is winding fine without tearing. Yeah i cant see myself using this over my Nikon

>>2731734
Yeah I couldn't imagine a build your own film camera would come close to a factory built cam. But was fun to build

File: woohoo.jpg (609KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]
woohoo.jpg
609KB, 1000x665px
Why do we not have recurring technique discussion threads when we have gear threads and recent photo threads?

To start out, I am happy today because I managed to take a photo @ 1/15 shutter speed and 200mm focal length hand-held that wasn't just blurred out. Trying to improve the steadiness of my hand. The lens did have VR, but Nikon's only accounts for 3 stops... so it's way below the recommended minimum for that focal length. I found out that each lens has to be held differently to be stable enough for the VR to make any difference in a situation like that. This opens a door to a whole new realm of practicing my hand.

Now it's your turn. Let's discuss techniques, both for shooting and post-processing.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D3200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern1094
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width6016
Image Height4000
Number of Bits Per Component16, 16, 16
Compression SchemeUnknown
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2015:12:28 21:25:24
White Point Chromaticity0.3
Exposure Time1/15 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
Light SourceFine Weather
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length200.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height665
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
a good rule is 1/focal length as your handheld shutter speed )before lens stability comes into play)

so, a 100mm lens should be handheld at 1/100s shutter speed minimum, unless you're pretty steady. This is really helpful.
>>
>>2731238
That is true. What I am practicing now is my ability to take sharp still images below that limit hand-held, mostly without any movement in them. As you said, "unless you're pretty steady"... well, I want to become pretty steady.

I think it's a good kind of self-torture that also benefits me in times when I do have enough light to stay above them. Nothing worse than a shaky photographer.

File: star110.jpg (48KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
star110.jpg
48KB, 1024x768px
Hi, I was cleaning stuff around the house and I found a Kodak Star 110. I have no idea how it works but I want to know where I can find film for it. Thanks.
4 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
http://shop.lomography.com/en/films/110-film/lomography-b-w-orca-100-iso-110

took 5 seconds to google
>>
>>2731225
/thread
>>
>>2731210

a 110 cam was like the first camera I owned and boy did that camera suck

>mfw i wanted to buy this one because it was pretty cheap
>but didnt because the cover is horrendous

why a cover like that is allowed at all? in a book of art, of all things.
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Taschen makes much better photography book mate. Just grab something else.
>>
The autism is strong in this one

File: 120.jpg (2MB, 2048x1398px) Image search: [Google]
120.jpg
2MB, 2048x1398px
Alright, im a 4 year vet who shoots with a 60d, some decent to good glass, i shoot people for newpapers and realty....

I have to over compensate on my 430ex flash with a gary fong diffuser to make up for the poor iso performance....

I need more iso so i can go lighter on the flash...

The 7d mark 2 and the 6d are the same price, Is a full frame sensor able to capture available natural light better then an apc?

I only have one l series lens and a lot of lenses that the 6d cant use so im leaning to the 7d mark 2 right now.... however, if full frame sensors are better and capture more accurately, should i go with a 6d then?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 60D
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:12:26 13:33:56
Exposure Time1/160 sec
F-Numberf/9.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating250
Lens Aperturef/9.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length14.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: Capture.png (295KB, 579x294px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
295KB, 579x294px
>>2730861
how hard is it to look it up yourself?
>>
Obviously the 6d is a better long term investment, significantly better in low light too.
>>
Sounds like you need to get yourself some fast prime glass, or learn to use your flash off camera. ISO performance should be a last resort fix, when comparing to benefits of more/different light setups, or wider apertures.

If you want to buy a new body for low light, then get the 6D. I can shoot mine at 25600 and it looks like a crop camera's 3200. 6400 on the 6D is as usable as 800 on most crop cameras.

File: R0133741 (Custom).jpg (105KB, 1000x662px) Image search: [Google]
R0133741 (Custom).jpg
105KB, 1000x662px
toast photos in this bread

read the sticky and resize ur shitsnapps

last one >>2725154

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:21 17:44:44
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Brightness3.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
4 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Haven't been here for 5 years. Can't believe this shit is still fucking up p.
>>
File: R0133741 (Custom).jpg (141KB, 1000x662px) Image search: [Google]
R0133741 (Custom).jpg
141KB, 1000x662px
>>2730658
>in p
>in rpt
>has no p

here, have a cropped pp

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeRICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera ModelGR
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:27 16:58:05
Exposure Time1/800 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating800
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Brightness3.5 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.30 mm
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
>>
>>2730660
We already have a RPT that's like 150 posts deep. Look before you post tripfag

>>2728886

File: tumblr_nzp5dq77co1rxvaf2o1_540.jpg (82KB, 540x365px) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_nzp5dq77co1rxvaf2o1_540.jpg
82KB, 540x365px
how do you do this cold and contrasty-silvery feel in photoshop?

i know this is a vsco preset, but i want to know what goes on behind the scenes, so to say?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone
Camera SoftwareVSCO
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2015:12:20 23:10:16
CommentProcessed with VSCOcam with a9 preset
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2560
Image Height1730
Scene Capture TypeStandard
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Lower colour temp in w/b
Lower reds in colour mixer
Not being definition of autism
>>
>>2730650
the whites are slightly yellow though...
you dont get that by lowering temp in wb
>>
>>2730648

make the blues cyan. it fixes everything.

File: stupid_genius.jpg (8KB, 292x266px) Image search: [Google]
stupid_genius.jpg
8KB, 292x266px
Hi /p/ stupid question incoming:

Is there an adapter to use a micro four thirds lens on an old four thirds body?
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Why not google it or ask in the stupid question thread?
>>
>>2730611

This post should help.
>>
>>2730611
you can't adapt a smaller flange back distance to a larger one. at least not without horrible lense lensing.

File: 537c85417c5e133caedf06308adb2e47.jpg (528KB, 1010x659px) Image search: [Google]
537c85417c5e133caedf06308adb2e47.jpg
528KB, 1010x659px
I want to do a documentary project on industry in my city. How does one get access to the locations and people I need? I feel like I'd just get laughed at if I called up companies asking for access to their plants for a personal photography project. I've thought about just driving down to the industrial area and taking photos from outside/talking to people, but I don't know how well that will work.

Very much inspired by Salgado's Workers and want to do a (much smaller) project in that vein.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeHasselblad
Camera ModelHasselblad H3D II-39
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh
PhotographerBob Tursack
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3000
Image Height1956
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionUnknown
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution100 dpi
Vertical Resolution100 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2012:04:03 00:51:15
Exposure Time372827/33554432 sec
F-Numberf/20.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/20.0
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1010
Image Height659
2 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
How did Salgado get his fucking tones?

To answer your question OP, just ask the construction companies if you can be a visitor to for your "documentary project"

Construction sites get visitors all the time. You'd get a hard hat, you take your pictures, then you leave. nbd. Worst that happens is they say no. They may say no for a variety of reasons. But I doubt you'll get "laughed at" so stop being a scardey cat and just ask!

Or you can walk around and get close to street workers and take pics. Not a big deal. Dress like a tourist. If you're asian, even better

File: g7leadpanasonic.jpg (64KB, 630x412px) Image search: [Google]
g7leadpanasonic.jpg
64KB, 630x412px
Boys, I'm buying a G7. I am going to be doing some video projects next year. Is the 14-42mm kit lens good enough for general tomfoolery until I save up for some GOAT crisp primes?

I mean, even the so-so image of the kit lens will be 10x better than the cheapo camcorder I have now, right?

Or should I get the body only and get a different zoom lens?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwarePhotos 1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2015:03:02 15:42:14
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width630
Image Height412
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
It's fine yeah, there's no point getting the 14-140 and the only constant aperture zooms are the 12-35 and the 12-40, which, whilst a he'll of a lot better are a fair whack more money
>>
>>2730568
>Is the 14-42mm kit lens good enough for general tomfoolery

Yes it is but don't expect any miracles from it. The 14-42 is a cheap kit lens which can be outperformed quite easily.

be sure to get that ultrasharp 20mm f1.7 pancake lens. It's a beast.

File: phpuamqrk.jpg (149KB, 970x679px) Image search: [Google]
phpuamqrk.jpg
149KB, 970x679px
Help me /p/!

So I have been in this huge pickle on what new camera body to get and after watching all the different review videos and comparing specs, I am turning here for help.

So, I shoot a lot of model photography (Mostly in low light scenes) as well as a lot of low light photography overall, so everyone is pointing me to the Sony A7 series of cameras or various Cannon/Nikkon, now I also do a ton of sport video/ short filmaking and I am looking for a camera that does some decent slow motion/low light video as well (4k would be nice to have but not necessary)

So then people say Sony rx10 ii or A7s ii and I know those cameras are not as good for photography, I dont know if I have not luked enough but is there a sort of bridge camera that has very good photo/low light quality, but has very strong almost studio quality video.

Thanks anons <3
3 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2730458
OP here again, forgot to mention by budget is arround 5000$ (Lenses + Acc Included)
>>
Sony a7rii?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6kSMd78oTU&t=12m27s

Crop mode video is on par with the a7s in low light but only goes up to 25,600 ISO.

File: PleaseNo.png (310KB, 1440x625px) Image search: [Google]
PleaseNo.png
310KB, 1440x625px
I hadn't ordered the C-41 press kit in a few months and now it's in store pickup only which isn't feasible for me.

What are other people doing for home development now? I know Freestyle sells the Unicolor C-41 kit but I've never used it; anyone have experience with it? I'd like to avoid sending all my color film to a lab.
2 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
I'm in the same position as you are. I now use the Unicolor C-41 kit and I can't tell any difference between the two kits. The direction sheet that comes in the kit is the same for both kits.

File: FB_IMG_1450456654467.jpg (12KB, 436x276px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1450456654467.jpg
12KB, 436x276px
Hi /p. I'm new to photography and unsure of what camera/lense to buy. I only have $300 to spend for one. Should I wait until I have more cash (that'll be a month from now), or if not could you show/recommend me some cheao DLSR's and lenses?

-pic unrelated/-pic for attention
5 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2728755
Pentax K-50 or Nikon D3x00 kit used might work, but whether you better wait depends on what you need.

Also, gear thread?
>>
Yeah, a gear thread definitely sounds like something to look for. And sure, this can also be a gear thread! Thanks for the help Anon!
>>
That depends on what you want to shoot, what you want out of your pictures. I had the same budget, for my needs I got myself a used 40d and a 50mm 1.8, but I don't need the high megapixels or video, or zoom, because my goal is to learn composition and storytelling. If your goals are different you may need to get something different

File: 35mm.png (859KB, 836x556px) Image search: [Google]
35mm.png
859KB, 836x556px
post your film snaps or recent pics in general

Minolta x-700
50mm
323 posts and 151 images submitted.
>>
File: 4L_Q5kyY5iD.jpg (2MB, 3130x2075px) Image search: [Google]
4L_Q5kyY5iD.jpg
2MB, 3130x2075px
Canon a1
50mm

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2015:10:30 18:16:31
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3130
Image Height2075
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2714711
clean
i like the colours but maybe raise the shadows in the foreground?? kinda dark compared to the rest of the photo
>>
>>2714707
Who is this semen demon?

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [522] [523] [524] [525] [526] [527] [528] [529] [530] [531] [532] [533] [534] [535] [536] [537] [538] [539] [540] [541] [542] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.