File: 20160109_103950.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 5312x2988px
Legitimately the first ever PENTACKS I've ever seen IRL. Have you ever spotted a PENTACKS in the wild /p/?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-N910G Camera Software N910GDTU1COJ3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:09 10:39:50 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/2.2 Brightness 1.0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash Focal Length 4.80 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Unique Image ID H16USHH04SA
43 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
A friend used to shoot pentax. Last one I saw was yesterday.. cute little asian girl who was waiting for the elevator next to me and my friends. Actually nice cameras.
>>
>>2740168
I've never seen a Pentax, Fuji, or Oly/Panasonic in the wild. All Canon, Nikon, and the raaare Sony mirrorless.
>>
File: IMGP0821.jpg (5MB, 3893x2101px) Image search:
[Google]
5MB, 3893x2101px
Just mine...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software paint.net 4.0.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:07 14:56:21 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/14.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4928 Image Height 3264 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
File: _0014633.jpg (408KB, 1000x714px) Image search:
[Google]
408KB, 1000x714px
Film vs Digital / Video, Archive edition
Lets forget about quality for this thread and focus on archiving.
there is no doubt in my mind that the video out of my a6000 is vastly better than my canon 814 super8, and is a fraction of the cost per minute of footage.
I recently read an article stating that Hollywood is going back to film because it costs less in the long rung, storing film is cheap and the technology to play it back doesn't get obsolete like software. While archiving video requires constant transfer to newer and newer formats, with the possibility of quality loss in each recoding.
Is film worth looking at for the average joe for archiving, are all our digital pictures and HD video just as doomed to time as VHS and Zip-disks?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH Camera Model GXR MOUNT A12 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Macintosh Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:01:08 10:07:33 White Point Chromaticity 0.3 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness 0 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Daylight Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 714 Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
22 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Oh god no just when Bolex-Pailliard Super 8 stuff was getting affordable hipsters are going to drive the prices of them back up again.
Fuck my life I didn't want one anyway
>>
>>
>>2739755
I thought video formats were pretty stable by now?
For horrible examples of improper archiving you should look at early digital audio formats. Actually, even some later digital audio formats.
File: 21528_925574397496619_7174597342902789680_n.jpg (58KB, 960x540px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 960x540px
we are studying at home.
we need funny moments in the picture, can you help us? thanks a lot
9 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: hinden.jpg (80KB, 634x470px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 634x470px
pic related
>>
>>2737481
what could you possibly expect to come of this
what goes through you people's minds whenever they post insipid "make a le funny me me" requests on a photography board
what do you want, a clown nose added? lactating nipples? meat falling from the ceiling? a lamprey mouth? would it really be all that better than going to some funny image website and looking?
>>
File: 21528_925574397496619_7174597342902789680_n.jpg (115KB, 960x540px) Image search:
[Google]
115KB, 960x540px
Anonymous
The Photo Revolver de Poche 2016-01-05 19:26:54 Post No.2737137
[Report] Image search: [Google]
The Photo Revolver de Poche 2016-01-05 19:26:54 Post No.2737137
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 2016-01-05 13.12.11.jpg (3MB, 2158x2028px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 2158x2028px
The Photo Revolver de Poche
Anonymous
2016-01-05 19:26:54
Post No. 2737137
[Report]
[View this topic]
>Cause this was a thing and I am amazed by it!!
Got a new book yesterday and this is just to great to not share.
>Pull pistol trigger to open shutter
A.K.A. taking the picture.
>Pull the hammer back to rotate cylinder
A.K.A. moving that negative to the back and bringing another forward.
The Photo Revolver is from 1882, printed on 20x20mm dry plates, had no viewfinder, held up to 10 dry plates at a time (earlier versions only held 4), and was exposed by opening the barrel which was a 70mm periscope with f/10 lense inside the barrel.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model SAMSUNG-SM-G900A Equipment Make samsung Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2016:01:05 13:12:11 Image Orientation Unknown Focal Length 4.80 mm White Balance Auto F-Number f/2.2
46 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
I. NEED. This.
...in my life...
>NOW!
>>
>>2737137
>be american
>go out to take photos with photo revolver
>get shot
>>
>>2737137
>go to the cop
>hey can I shoot a photo out of you
>"Sure"
>Take out revolver de poche
>Get shot
Old thread >>2734779
This is my first post and I'm sure you'll be able to tell from the photo itself, so please C&C and destroy my interest in the hobby.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 910 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 33 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:01:04 21:43:11 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 22.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1400 Image Height 933 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
318 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2736610
I kinda like it. It's nothing special and you've got a fuckton of negative space at the bottom, but the little cabin light is giving me cozy feelings
>>
>>2736595
bumping for an answer
I dont know why the fame file looks different depending on where i'm viewing it, or what it actually looks like to others/if it changes based on what theyre using to view it
File: frozenfood-Irving Penn.jpg (242KB, 900x1177px) Image search:
[Google]
242KB, 900x1177px
Where do you share your photos and interact with followers?
I tried Flickr, but I wasn't really feeling it. Should I try Instagram? I feel like Instagram has a much wider audience.
What do you guys use?
16 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2735637
Also, is 500px or any of the other Flickr alternatives worth using? Do they have a worthwhile userbase?
>>
Yeah, 500px has a dedicated community
>>
>>2735637
I use Flickr and Instagram. I find it's easier to get followers on Flickr but more people use Instagram. I think it depends on your kind of photography. Flickr users tend to go for more generic beautiful photos where Instagram loves fashion and more unorthodox photos with filters (raised and crushed blacks in your tone curve for 20% more likes!). 500px tends to be where the best stuff that everyone will like goes.
File: Instagram-256.png (11KB, 256x256px) Image search:
[Google]
11KB, 256x256px
Post your Instagram accounts below, make sure to include sample image/s and a link.
288 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_1099.jpg (1MB, 2448x2448px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2448x2448px
www.instagram.com/mctomch
Cars, personal life, and Japan right now.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2448 Image Height 2448 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: screencapture-www-instagram-com-the_conditioned_human-1450009964518.png (1MB, 975x1297px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 975x1297px
https://www.instagram.com/the_conditioned_human/
Trying to find my style. Half and half digital and film. Critique very welcome
>>
File: RainbowOverTheAspen.jpg (622KB, 1024x808px) Image search:
[Google]
622KB, 1024x808px
https://www.instagram.com/alexburkephoto/
Landscapes and whatnot.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Photographer Alex Burke Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:11:23 19:15:32 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1024 Image Height 808
File: video general 41.png (349KB, 800x700px) Image search:
[Google]
349KB, 800x700px
Archived Threads: https://fgts.jp/p/search/subject/video%20general/
Google.
311 Posts / 37 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2713785
a7s ii + sigma 20mm f1.4
>>
File: IMG_6020s.jpg (496KB, 1500x1102px) Image search:
[Google]
496KB, 1500x1102px
not exactly video but anyone shoot 35mm? looking for lab recommendations in london
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4619 Image Height 3394 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:02 12:07:57 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 1102 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
whats the best budget video camera other than the A6000
File: 11755101_912010472190926_2432857424841644849_n (1).jpg (80KB, 960x960px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 960x960px
Photoshop me this bastard faggots
2 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/wsr/32483
File: Raw vs 100% JPG.png (875KB, 1886x429px) Image search:
[Google]
875KB, 1886x429px
Why does all my JPG's look so disgusting? Everything I export that contains lots of oranges and other warm colors turn out cold and green. Orange becomes yellow and yellow becomes green, and then I have to edit the JPG's using Windows 10's editing system so that they don't look god-awful.
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
That is a color profiling problem. sRGB, which is usually the color profile jpegs are exported with, way narrower than adobeRGB, so a lot of compression is going on. On pro editing tools, such as Photoshop, you can "track" the compression to a point there's generally no visual distinction between the before and after (use the save for web... command). On the other hand, more casual programs such Paint or (sometimes) Lightroom won't do the proper tracking of the color when converting from working color space to sRGB, but rather just apply the sRGB profile on top on the working color space, causing the colors to look wrong and awful, like in your pic.
>>
>>2740471
I use Lightroom 5.4, so how do I fix the problem?
>>
>>2740485
I do not use LR, so I can't say. Make sure you exporting the sRGB, not saving it as adobeRGB jpegs. Also, google
File: big_thumb_826d16ebdd7e65fa94b42aa737fe817b.jpg (79KB, 736x491px) Image search:
[Google]
79KB, 736x491px
eh /p/ this is my first time on this page,I wanna start getting into photography. I want to get a budget dslr to take landscape pics with and maybe some night sky pictures aswell. Ive been looking at the nikon d3000 or the rebel t3, any suggestions? and ik i wont get great quality star shots with these cameras but would i get a decent pic if I set a high ISO, an aperture of f3.5 and a 20 sec exposure time?
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
buy a cheap aps-c body and a samyang/rokinon 12mm f2.0
>>
>>
>>2740324
My budget is probably 300$ or less
File: IMG_4858[1].jpg (4MB, 5184x2912px) Image search:
[Google]
![IMG_4858[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pXAieD5.jpg "IMG 4858[1]")
4MB, 5184x2912px
so /p/ what to do ?
i have Canon T3i btw.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 600D Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.2 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:01:09 02:09:42 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/13.0 Exposure Program Manual Lens Aperture f/12.9 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 2912 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative ISO Speed Rating Auto Sharpness Unknown Saturation High Contrast Unknown Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 236 Color Matrix 135
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2740111
You go outside and take photos.
>>
>>2740111
>don't take 30 second exposures of shit on your desk
>kill yourself
>>
A Canon DSLR updates dead pixel removal data every time manual sensor cleaning is activated. Warm sensor shows more almost dead pixels.
1. Leave camera to shoot video for few minutes to heat up the sensor.
2. Activate sensor cleaning / manual cleaning from menu. (Mirror goes up.)
3. Wait half a minute and turn the power off.
You should see less dead pixels. If that does not help, delete System32.
File: 12194782_10204823272681624_6530517362005969874_o.jpg (349KB, 2048x1370px) Image search:
[Google]
349KB, 2048x1370px
Guys, I'm going to be honest, I've only lurked this board a few times, but lately have been doing so more and more often and want to get a camera. Pic related was taken by a friend at a racetrack. I'd like to shoot some motorsport too, and have saved up a bit to buy a DSLR and a lens.
I've been gathering some info of the cameras I can afford and it boils down to two: EOS 700D and Pentax K-50. I was going to buy the Pentax because for the same price as the Canon I get an extra 50-200 lens apart from the 18-50 that both include.
A couple of days ago I read the sticky and have been talking to everyone I know that's into photography. Some professionals even. They all recommend Canon. Nevertheless the Pentax is better on paper and includes another lens. Canon has Magic Lantern going for it though (I really don't know if it's actually any good, but some people praise it a lot)
I'm sure this board sees heaps of posts like this one, and you are probably sick of them, but please help me out, I did my best to be as little a noob as I can be, and just want to buy the right thing.
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2740104
If you're going to be shooting high speed subjects, you'll want an AF system that's better than what's on a canon rebel. Get a beat up 7D body if you do go Canon.
i don't have experience with the Pentax, but I have used both Canon, Nikon, and Fuji cameras, and I can say that the files that come out of non-Canon cameras are much easier to manipulate, push, and edit. Canon is very usable, especially in good light, but it's something to take note of.
>>
>>2740122
What about the 750D? It's supposed to be a nice upgrade from the 700 and is still in my pricerange. Haven't seen many second hand 7Ds around
>>
>>2740104
get a used Canon T2i flash magic lantern get an 18-135mm. or a Nikon D3200 with the 18-140
pentax is good for weather sealing, even if you plan on shooting in light rain the canon and nikon will still do the job regardless. unless youre going storm chasing id recommend getting a canon or nikon due to an array of lens selections
Gopro N00B
Need recomendations to improve my Youtube channel quality 2016-01-09 00:12:26 Post No.2740094
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Need recomendations to improve my Youtube channel quality 2016-01-09 00:12:26 Post No.2740094
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: CHDHY-401_main1.jpg (218KB, 2800x1489px) Image search:
[Google]
218KB, 2800x1489px
Need recomendations to improve my Youtube channel quality
Gopro N00B
2016-01-09 00:12:26
Post No. 2740094
[Report]
[View this topic]
Here you can see my timelapse vid I made with a gopro hero4 silver, and need some recomendations, Here i leave you the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e12_XKR9mSY
4 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I think you could try to put the cam in a better position, with better light conditions
>>
>>2740094
get a 20,000 dollar camera. movie makers use those. they seem to fix the problem.
File: nature_peyto_lake_banff_national_park_canada_1024x600_hd-wallpaper-353945.jpg (930KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
930KB, 1920x1080px
First of all, I dont know much about cameras, but I do travel alot and I want to try to start taking photos of my adventures. So I want a camera that is good for Nature Photography, but not to expensive. Do you have any suggestions? And please share pics of the best nature photos you have taken!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Photographer Frank Krahmer Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5120 Image Height 3413 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2011:11:03 16:40:55 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
What's your budget?
>>
>>2740125
I could probably go up to like 1000-1300$ or so. Maximum. preferably as cheap as possible. But also a good one.
>>
The most important thing for good nature photography is good lenses. Then a good tripod. Then the camera. Yes camera is last.
But just start with a camera with its kit lens until you figure out what focal lengths speak to you. Then you can buy a prime lens (fixed focal length lens) that has great sharpness and no chromatic aberration to fuck up your pictures.
A low end Nikon DSLR is just fine. If you want weather-sealing, you'll pay more. But you'll also get better manual controls. There's no one right answer on what camera to get, because it depends on your budget and your needs.